Capitalism’s Fatal Flaw. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

Capitalism’s

 

Fatal Flaw.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

Capitalism’s fatal flaw arises from the inherent inner dynamic of the capitalist system, personified by, and ruled by, the ruling faction of the capitalist ruling class, whereby they eventually secretly turn against the growth of “the social forces of production” [Marx] – i.e., against the societal self-reproductive self-force of the human species, and the general progress of humanity – ultimately turning, ‘humanocidally’, against the majority population of humanity, when world market competition-driven technological obsolescence depreciation degrades and devalues the capital-value of the largest legacy ownership concentrations of industrial fixed capital, and of the bank loans that purchased it, hence the capital of the big banks that loaned for its purchase, and thereby drives write-offs that crash the profits of those most-ownership-concentrated capitals, owned by the very biggest capital owners who constitute that very ruling faction of the capitalist ruling class [= Marx’s “law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall”, de-abstracted for fixed capital and for the world market competition of capitals].

 

 

This flaw is not the only flaw of the capitalist system, but it is the fatal flaw, the flaw that, in its final and fullest crudescence, makes the – finally ‘humanocidal’ – capitalist system unsurvivable for humanity, making the concrete transcendence of the capitalist system the only alternative to the global extinction of the human race.

 

 

‘Descendence-phase’ capitalism’s many other flaws – its accelerating and accumulating production of pollution and other externalities; its recurring economic “recessions” and depressions, later-on weaponized by the capitalist ruling faction, with the majority class always bearing the brunt of the damage; its continual inflation, continually lowering majority class purchasing power and living standards, and its other abuses of majority class workers; its later-on erosion of political checks and balances, and of civil liberties, by the, unchecked capitalist ruling faction’s coordinated “buy-out” of all 3 branches of political government – will gradually, cumulatively and eventually discredit the capitalist system in the minds of the majority class, despite the divide-and-conquer ideologies continually manufactured and propagated by that ruling faction, and by their prostitute mass media – will prepare the majority class to vote-out capitalism, and to constitutionally and statutorily construct the higher system, that of political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, based upon a new, higher “social relation of production” [Marx], one that ‘«aufheben»-ates’ the “capital-relation” [Marx], the social relation of production that bases the capitalist system.

 

 

The fatal flaw of the capitalist system itself also arises from a social injustice, one most often not mentioned or discerned.

 

 

It is unjust that increases in ‘social reproductive force’ – in social productivity – which accrue, incrementally, to the benefit of all social individuals, should also have devastating consequences, e.g., of bankruptcy and ruin, to a part of society: to the capitalists holding the obsolescence-devalued means of production capital-assets and loan-capital assets.

 

 

But because the sufferers of this injustice – unlike most of the other sufferers of capitalist injustice, who are typically individually powerless and already impoverished – are the richest in capital, hence in money, hence powerful and influential, their fight against this injustice takes the form of a fight against the interests, and against the very lives, of the rest of society, e.g., of the majority class, and, ultimately, of a global ‘humanocidal’ pogrom, via “designer disease” pandemics, by ‘stealth humanocide’ via lethal pseudo-foods, lethal pseudo-medicines and lethal pseudo-vaccines, via “Global Warming” hysteria and hyper-austerity, etc.  See –

 

Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: 'Rocke-Nazi' Plutocracy Publicly Proclaims Planned Planetary Population Plummeting. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

This injustice is also the reason why, in our proposed Equitist Constitutional-Reform Annex, establishing Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, a popularly-supported kind of ‘technodepreciation insurance’ [in kind] is provided, both as required for [market-competing] Citizen Stewardship Equity socialized producers’ cooperatives, and also for private capital enterprises who voluntarily subscribe to the technodepreciation insurance offering, and pay their premiums.

 

 

As technological progress – “the growth of the social forces of production” – continues to accelerate under the Equitist constitutional reform, the premiums paid for this insurance, by both Stewardship Equity and private capitalist firms, are not expected to cover the full cost of the insurance claims. 

 

 

That is why this policy of technodepreciation insurance must be democratically supported by the electoral majority, and must be provided by the government, from the revenues generated by Stewardship, private-corporate, and individual citizen production, since only the government, and not any private insurance company, can absorb the expected volume of insurance claims’ losses.

 

 

The private capitalist firms who subscribe to this insurance must pay higher premiums for it, because the replacement means of production granted to them, when they file a valid claim of technodepreciation of their former means of production, become their private property, their capital-property.

 

 

The Citizen Stewardship Equity producers’ cooperatives must pay lower premiums, because the replacement means of production granted to them when they file a valid claim of technodepreciation of their former means of production remain social property, over which they have stewardship, but not local ownership, and for the use of which they pay a monthly ‘Social Rent’.

 

 

The threat of technodepreciation, from upstart innovators in the ruling faction’s “home” nation-states, and, especially, from new industrialization in the formerly “underdeveloped” nations of the ruling-faction-created “Third World”, of the formerly hyper-impoverished “semi-periphery” of the original core nations of industrial-capitalist development, is an ongoing inducement to ‘humanocidal’ pogroms by the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ ruling faction.

 

 

There is a political-economic secret war, ongoing between the “capitalist core” nation-states of, e.g., Britain, France and the USA, versus their “semi-periphery”, of, e.g., Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Vietnam, Singapore, Indonesia, Taiwan, Argentina, Iran, Pakistan, etc.

 

 

A new, higher state of society, fostering a re-accelerated advancement of the societal self-reproductive self-force of humanity, and the global renaissance that such advancement will bring, must also, in its pursuit of social justice – indeed, in its pursuit of ‘generalized equity’ – include bringing an end to the injustice, the inequity, the ‘‘‘side effect’’’, of technological obsolescence depreciation, as a burden of bankruptcy and impoverishment imposed upon a minority of human social individuals by the advancement of humanity as a whole.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION –

 

‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’; 

 

BOOK:

 

MARX’S MISSING BLUEPRINTS

Free-of-Charge Download of Book PDF –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘The Principle of CONTRACIDE’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘The Principle of

 

CONTRACIDE’.

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

‘Contra-Cide’ – “contra-killing” – is our name for a principle potentially implementable with the higher development of military strategy in an advanced civilization – one considerably more advanced technologically, and morally, than our own – when confronting a hostile adversary of combatants hell-bent, as usual, on killing as many of that advanced civilization’s soldiers and citizens as possible, in hopes of “victory”.

 

As Marx once noted, a human society’s actually operative morality – as distinct from aspirational and lip-service morality – can never rise higher than the development its social forces of production can support.

 

A sufficient leap forward in the level of the social forces of production – a leap sufficient to catapult human society into “escape velocity”; to beyond what Marx called “the prehistory of humanity”, i.e., beyond the capitalist instar of humanity – albeit that the growth of human-societal self-reproductive force usually also translates, in part, to a growth in the human-societal self-destructive force, could enable a more humane departure from the lose-lose aspect of the consequences of war throughout humanity’s “pre-history” to-date.

 

The advanced weapons-systems of such a productively and reproductively advanced, ‘post-prehistoric’ human civilization could be engineered in a new way.

 

Such weapons systems might be designed to disable the weapons of the less-advanced adversary – a human-social adversary more backward, both morally and techno-logically – that seeks to attack and conquer or destroy the more advanced human civilization.

 

The advanced weapons-systems could be designed to destroy only the weapons of the humans who wield them, without harming the bodies of those other humans.

 

Or, the advanced weapons-systems could be designed to render those adversary’s weapons simply inoperative and irreparable, without any bodily injury to the combatants.  

 

It might, or might not, be necessary to take the adversary’s then weaponless combatants into ‘‘‘protective custody’’’, until a settlement could be negotiated which would render them non-combatants, by a willingly mutually-enacted treaty securing peace.

 

If such custody were to be necessary, the adversary’s combatants should, per this ‘principle of contracide’, be held in the most humane conditions; in befriending conditions that might develop toward friendships between the two sides in many cases.

 

Such humane treatment and provisioning of the combatants in custody is something that a society of highly-developed ‘self-re-productive self-force’, and hence, also of high all-round prosperity, could well afford to do, and could not afford not to do.

 

Alas, for the present, we are all still “lost somewhere deep in prehistoric times” [Seldon].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION –

 

‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’; 

 

BOOK:

 

MARX’S MISSING BLUEPRINTS

Free-of-Charge Download of Book PDF –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'‘‘A GENERAL METHOD’’’: The Seldonian ‘Qualo-Peanic Method’ for Categorial-Progression Dialectics.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘‘‘A GENERAL METHOD’’’:

 

 

The Seldonian

‘Qualo-Peanic Method’

 

for

 

Categorial-Progression

Dialectics.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

The ultra-simplified, equation-less, exponent-less, sans mathematical-symbols version of the Seldonian dialectical method applies a qualitative version of the Peano successor function, from the Peano-Dedekind axiomatics of the first-order-logic “Natural Numbers”, to its category-symbols progressions.

 

The generalized procedure of this method is as follows –

 

1.  Choose an effective starting-category, call it q_a, for the Domain whose ontological categorial progression you wish to construct, based upon your “domain expertise” for that Domain.  Thus, the first category-term of your categorial “progression” is just q_a; it consists so far of just that one category-symbol term.

 

2.  Make a copy of q_a, and append subscript ‘_a’ to its already-present ‘_a’ subscript, thus constructing a new –

initially a category-algebraic unknown – category name, q_aa.  Then, “and” [“&”] this second category-name to your first, thus constructing a two-term, minimal categorial progression: q_a & q_aa.

 

3.  Determine that definitional word/phrase that expresses the meaning of category-symbol q_aa, in the context of your Domain, thus rendering q_aa no longer an algebraic unknown.  Suppose that the abbreviation/initial letter of that definitional word/phrase is represented by ‘b’.  Replace q_aa with q_b.  Your categorial progression is thus now: q_a & q_b. 

 

4.  Again, make a copy of the most recent/last category-term,  q_b, and again append subscript ‘_a’ to its ‘_b’ subscript, thus constructing a new, initially category-algebraic unknown, category name, q_ba.  

Then, “and” this third category-name to your first two, thus constructing a three-term categorial progression: q_a & q_b & q_ba.

 

5.  Determine that definitional word/phrase that expresses the meaning of category-symbol q_ba, in the context of your Domain, thus rendering q_ba no longer an algebraic unknown.  Suppose that the abbreviation/initial letter of that definitional word/phrase is represented by ‘g’.  Replace q_ba with q_g.  Your categorial progression has now thus been resolved as: q_a & q_b & q_g.

 

6.  Again, make a copy of the most recent/last category-term,  q_g, and again append subscript ‘_a’ to its ‘_g’ subscript, thus constructing a new, initially category-algebraic unknown, category name, q_ga.  Then, “and” this fourth category-name to your first three, thus constructing a four-term categorial progression: 

q_a & q_b & q_g & q_ga.

 

7.  Determine that definitional word/phrase that expresses the meaning of category-symbol q_ga, in the context of your Domain, thus rendering q_ga no longer an algebraic unknown.  Suppose that the abbreviation/initial letter of that definitional word/phrase is represented by ‘d’.  Replace q_ga with q_d.  Your categorial progression has now thus been resolved as:

 q_a & q_b & q_g & q_d.

 

You no doubt see the procedural pattern, the algorithm, of this, ‘Peanic’, ultra-simplified version of the Seldonian dialectical method.

 

 

This method is applied to the example of the [singular] ‘dialectic of Nature’ below, beginning with a chosen starting-category description, q_r, standing for the pre-atomic “particles” ‘cosmo-ontological’ category –

 

1.  Write  q_r, standing for the category of pre-atomic “particle” units, as starting category.

 

2.  Write q_r & q_rr, with q_rr describing a category each of whose units is a combination of multiple “particles” units, i.e., “atoms” units, which combine the “particles” units known as electrons, protons, and neutrons.

 

3.  Re-write q_r & q_rr as q_r & q_a, with subscript a standing for the category of “atoms” units. 

 

4.  Write q_r & q_a& q_ar.  Hybrid subscript ar suggests those known cosmological objects that convert particle units, i.e., “Hydrogen ion” units, that is, proton particle units, into atom units, i.e., into Helium atomic nuclei units, by means of the process known as “stellar nucleosynthesis”. 

Thus, replace subscript ar with subscript s for a category that starts with “first-generation star” units.  Later generation star units also start with proton-electron plasma cores, but their core-surrounding outer layers consists not only of Helium units, but also, increasingly, of atomic species units higher than Helium, due to accumulating “metallization” from generations of stellar nucleo-synthesis.

Your short-hand categories descriptions series now extends to 3 category-signs q_r & q_a& q_s.

 

5.  Write q_r & q_a & q_s& q_sr.  

As q_sr is also q_arr, since s is also ar, and, as we previously replaced subscript rr with subscript a, you can now rewrite q_sr as q_aa. 

 

Interpret q_aa as describing a category each of whose units are combos of multiple “atom” units, i.e., whose units are “molecule” units, call them q_m.

 

The short-hand category description q_aa also describes other kinds of combinations of atoms, such as crystals and metals, but we see molecules as the principal species of the q_aa genus.

 

So your series now represents our cosmos when it contained only four types of units: q_r & q_a & q_s & q_m.

 

6.  Write q_r + q_a + q_s + q_m + q_mr.  

As q_mr suggests combinations of molecule units with particle units, assign this short-hand category description as fitting mainly and initially for the impacts of particle units fluxes on the molecule units forming in interstellar “molecular clouds”, and the results of such [inter]actions, e.g., involving ultraviolet photon particles: molecule units’ photo[n]-disintegrations. 

Your series now describes our universe when it contained only objects fitting the following 5 category descriptions –

q_r & q_a & q_s & q_m & q_mr. 

We leave the 5^th short-hand category description in 2-subscript form, since a single name for that category is not extant or widely familiar.  The 2-subscript form is thus more mnemonic.

 

7.  Write 

q_r & q_a & q_s & q_m & q_mr & q_mrr.  

We previously replaced subscript rr with subscript a.  therefore, replace q_mrr with  q_ma. 

The latter short-hand describes, mainly, the, still ongoing, conversions/combinations of chemically-unbonded atom units into new molecule units, inside interstellar molecular cloud units, as catalyzed or promoted by the molecule units already formed inside those “molecular cloud” units. 

Recall that “molecular cloud” units must have had to start out as, i.e. – ‘molecule-less’ – ‘atomic cloud’ units.  So the later, mostly-molecular clouds still contain, and are also episodically replenished, e.g., by stars’ mass expulsions, with fresh, chemically-un-bonded atoms.  Conversions of atom units into molecule units are thus ongoing within interstellar molecular cloud units. 

Your purely-qualitative cosmos model now sums up our cosmos when it contained only objects/units of one of the following 6 category kinds – 

q_r & q_a & q_s & q_m & q_mr & q_ma.

Again, we are here leaving the 6^th shorthand category description in its 2-subscript form, because a single name for that category is not extant or widely familiar. 

Thus, its 2-subscript form is more mnemonic than a 1-subscript form, with a single subscript abbreviating a name that we just made up for this ma kind of, “hybrid”, units, which would hence be a new and unfamiliar –hence non-mnemonic – name. 

      

8.  Write 

q_r & q_a & q_s & q_m & q_mr & q_ma & q_mar.  

As we have previously interpreted subscript ar as subscript s, consistency with that earlier interpretation leads us to replace subscript mar with two-place subscript ms, describing combinations, or interactions, between molecule units and star units. 

This subscript can be interpreted as describing the conversion, into new, advancing, more-complex species of molecules, fostered or catalyzed by some of the molecules already produced in intra-galactic, interstellar “molecular/atomic clouds”, of the atoms of advancing, more-complex atomic species, created by, and initially inside, slowly ‘self-metallizing’ star units. 

In short, subscript ms suggests the further ‘molecularization’ of stars-produced higher, “metal” species of atoms – of atomic species beyond Helium. 

Subscript ms can also suggest the catalytic actions of certain kinds of molecule units on the formation of later-generation star units, e.g., with their accompanying planet units, made possible by advancing species of, more “metallic”, atomic and molecular species. 

In general, this category symbol connotes the effects of molecules on stars, and reciprocal effects of stars on molecules. 

More specifically, the short-hand category description, q_ms, can also be seen as describing the actions, by molecules, in the molecular clouds that precipitate “proplyds” [proto-planetary discs], that accelerate/catalyze the transformation of those proplyds into stars [e.g., with orbiting planets], as the accumulating “metallization” of successive generation stars, and therefore also of “molecular clouds”, proceeds. 

Your purely-qualitative cosmos content-inventory now describes the universe when it contained only objects fitting for the following 7 short-hand category descriptions –

q_r & q_a & q_s & q_m & q_mr & q_ma & q_ms.

 

9.  Write 

q_r & q_a & q_s & q_m & q_mr & q_ma & q_ms & q_msr.  

As subscript s comes from subscript ar, subscript msr is replaceable by subscript marr.  As we have, previously, replaced subscript rr with subscript a, subscript marr is therefore replaceable by subscript maa.  As we have previously replaced subscript aa with subscript m, subscript maa is thus replaceable by subscript mm. 

Subscript mm suggests a new category, standing for a yet new type of units, beyond the molecule units’ category – units each of which is, typically, a combination of myriad molecule units. 

Thus, subscript mm can describe trans-molecular, “cellular”, prokaryotic cell units, e.g., bacterial cell units, albeit that such units are presently known to exist, so far, only “locally”, on our own home planet – on planet Earth. 

If we hypothesize that such cell units will be found, in the future of human deep space observation and exploration, to be plentiful across our home galaxy, and even across our cosmos, in galaxy after galaxy, then we are holding the category of prokaryote units to be a cosmological category in its own right, not just a Terran category. 

If so, your purely qualitative cosmos-history description now fits for the universe when it contained only objects that fit the following 8 short-hand category descriptions –

q_r & q_a & q_s & q_m & q_mr & q_ma & q_ms & q_p.

 

 

We’ll stop this example at this point, noting that 120 further short-hand category-symbols could accrue, by the same method, up to the 128^th category, that of “humanitys”, or of ‘human meta-societies as units’, with its short-hand category description given as q_h.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!