__: A more comprehensive version of this text is now available via --__

**NOTE TO READERS**http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Welcome.html

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Applications_files/Revised,Application_Page_Posting,The_Seldonian_Psychohistorical-Dialectical_Equations,by_Aoristos_Dyosphainthos,20SEP2014.pdf

Dear Readers,

__--__

**Guest Author**I have reproduced, below, for your information, the blog entry of Aoristos Dyosphainthos, Chief Public Liaison Officer of

**F**.

__.__

**E**__., entitled '__

**D****The F**.

__.__

**E**__.__

**D**

*Psycho**historical**-*

*Dialectical**Equations**'*, from his blog at www.dialectics.org:

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Aoristoss_Blog/Entries/2012/5/19_The_F.E.D._Psychohistorical_Equations.html

Regards,

Miguel Detonacciones,

Officer,

**F**.

**.**

*E***. Office of Public Liaison**

*D***"**

**The**

**F**.

**.**

__E__**.**

__D__

*'''*

*Psychohistorical**-*

__Dialectical__Equations*'''*

The Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [

**F**.**.**__E__**.] ‘‘‘Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’’’ were designed, by the General Council of**__D__**F**.**.**__E__**., to create a ‘Time-Vault of the Future’, by means of a ‘meta-planetarium projector’, -- named the ‘‘‘**__D__**F**.**.**__E__**. Prime Radiant’’’, to project 3-D holographic representations of the solution-scenarios of this system of “simultaneous” 'dialectical meta-equations', and of their scenario-valued variables, for future values of their time-variables, i.e., to algorithmically ‘pre-construct’ dialectical-mathematically-generated richly-determinate imagery for the future history expected per these equations.**__D__
All but one of these seven equations utilize the ‘

__Dyad__ic Seldon Function’ formulation of dialectical ontological progressions [**=**of [revolutionary**]***new***-**__kinds__*of-being*progressions], a function which was defined earlier in this series, and which is also defined via the following link –The

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. General Council is thereby enabled to anticipate – in timing, and in event-content –**

__D__approaching “Seldon Crises”, for more about which, in terms of their [science-]fictional instantiation by Isaac Asimov, see –

I have listed, below, this system of seven dialectical equations, which are to be solved ‘‘‘simultaneously’’’ for the new ontology possibly emergent during the

**ime period,**

__t__**t**

**x**[denoting the generic ‘‘‘epoch’’’ of the dialectical progression denoted by

**x**] of the future value of that

**ime-period variable which is to be solved-for.**

__t__
The versions of the

**F**.**.**__E__**. ‘‘‘Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’’’ rendered and partially explicated further below, are all rendered in the rule-based ideographical algebraic language-system of the**__D__**F**.**.**__E__**. “First Dialectical Arithmetic / Algebra”, denoted by**__D____N__**.**__Q___
The nine core algorithms, rules, or “axioms” of this
language, presented earlier in this series, are also available via the
following links –

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Dialectic_Ideography_files/6_Dialectics-Part1c-Briefing_OCR.pdf

[pp. I-144 through I-146].

-- and are also summarized, via largely ideographical symbolization, in the following '*.jpg' image --

The versions of these equations that are used by the ‘dialectical psychohistorians’ of the

Needless to say, this dialectical language is one of the

-- and are also summarized, via largely ideographical symbolization, in the following '*.jpg' image --

The versions of these equations that are used by the ‘dialectical psychohistorians’ of the

**F**.**.**__E__**. General Council, and that would be capable of driving the ‘‘‘**__D__**F**.**.**__E__**. Prime Radiant’’’, are formulated in a higher, richer dialectical language than that of the**__D__**N****, purely-qualitative algebra used here – a language that arises later in the dialectical, ‘ideo-ontological’ progression-presentation of the**__Q__**F**.**.**__E__**. systems of dialectical language.**__D__Needless to say, this dialectical language is one of the

*‘***-**__quant__o__itative’, rather than one of the "purely"-__**qual**__itative, dialectical languages that arises in that progression.__**qual**
We do not [yet] publicly disclose the rules-system of that
dialectical language.

The optimal historical timing of its disclosure is itself a matter for the most delicate psychohistorical-dialectical calculation.

However, immediately below, I give a summary description of the early dialectical language systems in the order that they are covered in that dialectical-systematic presentation, a presentation which we can summarily model by a ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’-based dialectical equation, also formulated in the

The optimal historical timing of its disclosure is itself a matter for the most delicate psychohistorical-dialectical calculation.

However, immediately below, I give a summary description of the early dialectical language systems in the order that they are covered in that dialectical-systematic presentation, a presentation which we can summarily model by a ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’-based dialectical equation, also formulated in the

**N****dialectical language.**__Q__
The generic [unspecified; unsolved] ontology symbols of
the

**N****dialectic are**__Q__**N**__Q____=__**{**__q__**1**,__q__**2**,__q__**3**,**…}**.##
The axiomatic system that governs the
'algorithmics' of these **N**__Q__ ‘meta-numbers’ is denoted by __N____Q___.

__Q__

__N__

__Q___

The notational conventions adhered to herein, to the
extent that the typographical limitations of this medium allow, are summarized
here --

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Welcome_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Draft%20Edition%201.00%20Draft,%20last%20updated%2014JUL2012,%20E.D.%20Dialectical%20Equations%20Notational%20Conventions,%20Module%20%231%20of%202.jpg

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Welcome_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Draft%20Edition%201.00%20Draft,%20last%20updated%2014JUL2012,%20E.D.%20Dialectical%20Equations%20Notational%20Conventions,%20Module%20%232%20of%202.jpg

In the sequel, we use the symbol ‘

**’ to stand in place of the phrase “is equal to, by definition”.**

__=__The underscored mnemonic symbols stand for ‘dialectical meta-numbers’ – i.e., for purely-qualitative values that operate, arithmetically and algebraically, according to the

**F**.

**.**

__E__**.**

__D__*‘Fundamental Rule of Dialectical Logic’*, a rule that was proven deductively here, from the

__N__**axioms, previously in this series. We give that proof here again, below, for ease of reader reference --**

__Q___The following image presents the

*version of the*

**generic**__.__

**E**__. standard 'dialectogram' formats which we will apply herein to support our readers' in visualizing the dialectical processes encoded by the various 'psychohistorical-dialectical equations' presented in this text, with emphasis on the__

**D***encoded in / predicted by / reconstructed by each such 'dialectical equation' --*

**first triad**The above-diagrammed

**generic***of the first*

__dialectical__interpretation*of the*

**three****N**

**‘meta-natural meta-numbers’ as a**

__Q__*'*, can be

**'**__dialectical__triad__, for the__

**extended***of these*

**fourth****N**

**‘meta-natural meta-numbers’,**

__Q__*, as indicated in the following tableau --*

**and beyond**It should also be noted, at the outset, that the

*of*

**kind***'*

**dialectical***encountered in, and modeled, by the*

**oppositenesses**'**F**.

**.**

__E__**. Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations, is**

__D____the__

**not***, named, by Charles Muses,*

**kind***"'*

__'''__**Annihilatory***,*

**oppositeness**__the__

**nor***that he called*

**kind***"*

__"__**Complementary***, but is, primarily, of the*

**oppositeness****kind**called, by Karl Seldon,

*'*

__'__**Supplementary***--*

**oppositeness**Since all of the ‘

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’ are equations of ‘psycho**

__D__**dialectics’, we use the assignment symbol ‘**

__historical__**[--->**’ to indicate an association of an unassigned, unsolved, or “generic”

**N**

**‘meta-natural meta-number’ to a specific, mnemonic [psycho]historical-dialectical ontological category symbol [“kind of being” symbol], within a given [psycho]**

__Q__

__historical__*-*dialectical ‘[psycho]physio-ontological’ progression:

[interpreted/solved/specific historical category symbol]

**[--->**[generic**N****‘meta-number’ symbol], e.g. --**__Q__
The <<

**apital>>-relation as a human[oid]-social relation of production**__K__**<--->**__K__**[--->**__q__**16**
However, for ‘pure idea-systems’, and for their

**‘ideo-ontological’ dialectical categorial progressions, we use the assignment symbol, or solution symbol, ‘**__presentational__**[---)**’, to indicate such associations, e.g. --
“Thesis” axioms-system;

**“***standard***N**aturals” in**1**^{st}order specification; ‘pure-quantifier’ algebra**(---)**__N___**[---)**__q__**1**
“Antithesis” system;

**1**^{st}order,__non__*-*standard, dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘pure-qualifier’ algebra**(---)**__N____Q___**[---)**__q__**2**The beginning – or «

**» -- category and system of ‘ideas-ontology’ in the**

*arche’***F**.

**.**

__E__**.**

__D__

__presentational__*-*dialectical progression for the

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. axioms-systems of dialectical arithmetic, is the system of the arithmetic of the “**

__D__**N**atural”

**N**umbers,

**N**

__=__

**{1**,

**2**,

**3**,

**…}**, as formulated by only the four Peano postulates that are expressible in “first order” formal symbolic logic [“first order” logic here means a language of formal logic that makes assertions about individual “

**N**atural Numbers” only, but

__about qualities__

*not**shared*by multiple “

**N**atural Numbers”, such as “Even-ness”, “Odd-ness”, “Prime-ness”, “Composite-ness”, etc.].

We denote that “first-order” axioms-system of arithmetic by

**.**

__N___It is a dialectical arithmetic only in a ‘pre-vestigial’, implicit, quantitative-only sense, in that the Peano

**uccessor function,**

__s__**s**, is a degenerate, purely-quantitative «

**» operation:**

*aufheben*

**s(n)**

**=**

**n**

**+**

**1**, given an

**n**in

**N**.

The algorithm that generates this system

__s__*-*progression is termed, by us, a ‘meta-model’, because a “model” would cover only a single system, whereas this progression contains a**infinite multitude of successive systems.***potentially*
We use the term

*‘‘‘*to describe the [self-]developmental dynamics**evolution**’’’**, whether it be a natural, physical system [‘physio-system’], a human ideas-system [‘ideo-system’] such as a mathematical axiomatic system, or a human psychohistorical system – i.e., an ‘ideo-physio-system’ – such as a human socio-economic system. ‘‘‘Evolutions’’’ are***within a single system***.***transitions between historically successive states*__within__a single system
We therefore use the term

*‘*to describe the [revolutionary]**meta**-**evolution**’*transitions***– from historical predecessor system to historical successor system -- which involve irruptions of new ontology.**__between__systems
The ‘Dyadic Seldon Function Meta-Model’ of the

**F**.**.**__E__**. Method of Presentation [ = ‘Meta-Systematic Dialectic’] for this progression of dialectical-mathematical system**__D__**, is therefore –**__s__**(**

__N___)^(**2**

**^**

**s)**

-- wherein

**s**denotes a**W**hole Number variable,**W**__=__**{0**,**1**,**2**,**3**,**… }**, representing/counting the cumulative number of**into the exposition. Four steps in, i.e., for**__s__teps**tep**__s__**s****=****3**, we solve this ‘meta-model’ as follows:**(**

__N___**)**

**^**

**(**

**2**

**^3**

**)**

**=**

**(**

__N___**)**

**^**

**(**

**8**

**)**

**=**

a non-amalgamative sum of

**8**‘idea-ontological’ categories, each connoting a qualitatively different, ‘ideo-ontologically’ different dialectical-mathematical axioms-system --

#
__N___ + __NQ___ + __NU___ + __NM___ + __Nq__MN_____ + __Nq__MQ_____+ __Nq__MQN_____+ __NA___ [---)

#
__q__1 + __q__2 + __q__3 + __q__4 + __q__5 + __q__6 + __q__7 + __q__8.

These first eight axioms-systems of dialectical arithmetic can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘pure ideo-systems’ assignment symbol, ‘

**(---)**’—

__N___**(---)**Thesis system of

**natural numbers arithmetic in**

__standard__**1**

^{st}order specification, as

*purely quantitative*algebra.

__N__

__Q___**(---)**

**1**

^{st}‘Anti-thesis’

**1**

^{st}order axioms-system,

__non__*-*standard model of

**,**

__N___**1**

^{st}dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘pure-qualifier algebra’.

__N__

__U___**(---)**

**1**

^{st}[full] ‘Synthesis’ system;

**1**

^{st}order,

**2**

^{nd}dialectical ‘meta-numbers’, ‘quantifiable <<

**>>-qualifier’ algebra.**

*monad*

__N__

__M___**(---)**

**2**

^{nd}‘Anti-thesis’ system of

**1**

^{st}order,

**3**

^{rd}dialectical ‘metrical qualifier meta-numbers’; purely qualitative algebra.

__N__

__q__**M**

**N**

_____**(---)**Partial ‘synthesis’ system of

**1**

^{st}order,

**4**

^{th}dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘quantifiable metrical qualifiers’ algebra.

__N__

__q__**M**

**Q**

_____**(---)**Partial ‘synthesis’,

**1**

^{st}order,

**5**

^{th}dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘compound unquantifiable metrical qualifiers’.

__N__

__q__**M**

**Q**

**N**

_____**(---)**

**2**

^{nd}full ‘Synthesis’ system; fully-algorithmic “dimensional analysis” via quantifiable state-variable qualifiers algebra.

__N__

__A___**(---)**

**3**

^{rd}‘Anti-thesis’ system of

**1**

^{st}order,

**7**

^{th}dialectical ‘

**-qualifiers’; purely qualitative algebra [implicitly, but not yet explicitly, an ideography for**

*dynamical*__system__**[**

*dynamical***&**‘‘‘meta-dynamical’’’, super

**^0**-meta-]

**].**

*systems*The

*of this Method of Presentation [*

**first triad**__=__‘Meta-Systematic Dialectic’] for this progression of dialectical-mathematical system

**can be depicted as follows --**

__s__The system of seven dialectical 'meta-equations' which constitute ‘the

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. Psychohistorical-Dialectical Meta-Equations’ are:**

__D__
1.

**The Meta**-**Equation of**-*Human Ideology/Knowledge*Meta**Evolution**.
2.

**The Meta**-**Equation of***Human**-***Social**__Forces__of Production**Meta-Evolution**.
3.

**The Meta**-**Equation of***Human**-***Social**__Relations__of Production**Meta**-**Evolution**.
4.

**The Meta**-**Equation of***Human**-*(**Social**__Formation__**)**__s__**Meta**-**Evolution**.
5.

**The Meta**-**Equation of****the***Human Genome / Human**‘***Phenome**’**Systematic Dialectic**.
6.

**The Meta**-**Equation of the Meta-Evolution of**[*Planetary Human***]***oid***.***ities*
7.

**The Meta**-**Equation of**.*The Psychohistorical Dialectic of the Dialectic Itself*In terms of the

__standard notation, all seven of these 'psychohistorical-dialectical meta-equations' share the following common form --__

**Encyclopedia Dialectica**
Of course, all seven of
these ‘psycho-historical dialectical meta-equations’ cohere in the context of
the

**F**.**.**__E__**.**__D__*‘‘‘*meta-equation’’’, or__Dialectical__Theory of Everything*‘*meta-equation’, for the__Dialectic__of Nature*as presently known to***total cosmos***Terran***umanity.**__h__
They all describe,
categorially, a

*‘*of that, our**-**__sub__**universe**’**,***total***: they describe aspects of what**__universe__*gone on, what*__has__*going on, and what -- ‘predictedly’ --*__is__*go on, ‘‘‘inside’’’ the presently most-advanced term of that*__will__*‘‘‘*meta-equation’’’, i.e., in the term representing the ontological category of ‘planetary**Everything****uman [meta-]societies’, such as our own.**__h__
This overarching,
singular

*‘‘‘***’’’**__Dialectic__of Nature*‘*is**meta**-**equation**’**defined, in our terminology, as a**__not__*‘*in the same, strict,**psychohistorical**-__dialectical__**meta**-**equation**’__sense, that the seven equations named above are termed, by us,__**direct***‘*.**psychohistorical**-__dialectical__**meta**-**equations**’
That is because this
overarching, singular

*‘‘‘***’’’**__Dialectic__of Nature*‘*does**meta**-**equation**’*not***address [**__directly__**uman-]**__h__*, ‘‘‘memetic’’’,***Phenomic***‘**eic’ matters --*__psych__**-**__collective__*ological, ‘intersubjectively-objective’,***psych***‘*material’, until its**historical**__psycho__**t****ALL****=****8**th epoch, cosmological*epoch***8**, and beyond, and thus until its**256**th category-term,**[which connotes the ‘cosmo-ontological category’ of [planetary]**__h__**uman[oid] societies], and beyond [or, arguably,**__h__*incipiently*, until its**t****ALL****=****7**th epoch, cosmological*epoch***7**, and thus until its**128**th category-term,**, which connotes the ‘cosmo-ontological category’ of proto-**__l__**anguage-based anima**__l__**societies, and beyond].**__l__
However,

**directly, this**__in__*‘‘‘***’’’**__Dialectic__of Nature*‘*is also at least a**meta**-**equation**’*‘*__-__*HALF*__psycho__*historical’*‘meta-equation’.
It is so because the
analogies, the metaphors, the terms-of-reference, the names, the categories,
the concepts in which any

**uman theory -- including in which any**__h__**uman**__h__*“*-- are framed, grasped, and transmitted can, only belong to the**Theory**”__of____Everything__**uman language, to the**__h__**uman «**__h__**» [inescapably also including the***mentalitÃ©***uman**__h__**], to the human ‘‘‘memes-pool’’’, to the human, collective mind, and hence, to the terms of the collective***ideology***uman, cognitive**__h__*and affective**‘*-- in short, to the terms of the total ‘**psyche**-**ology**’**uman**__h__*Phenome**’*that is extant, and that is ambient, in the time, and in the place, in which that theory arises.
For this

*‘‘‘*as**’’’**__Dialectic__of Nature__a__whole, as**whole -- as the**__THE__**of our «**__Totality__**» to the degree that we presently know it, and for its “highest”, most general ontological categories [for the***Kosmos***.**__E__**. domain**__D__**x****=****ALL**], with ‘**t****ALL**’ denoting a “Natural’’ number, i.e., from the set --**{1**,

**2**,

**3**, ...

**}**

-- and with

**t****ALL**also counting, and**[numerically, cardinally**__labeling__*‘‘‘*’’’], the__naming__**of***epochs**cosmological-ontological*__, we have --__**revolution**

**ALL**__>____-|-____<___{tALL}

_{}

**=**

**ALL**__n__

^{v}

^{t}

^{ALL}

^{}

-- such that ‘

**’ connotes the ‘physi[c]o-ontological category’ of the ‘‘‘sub-**__n__**uclear’’’ “particles”, that is, of the**__n__*‘‘‘*-composite bosons’’’ [e.g., excluding the mesons], and of the__non__*‘‘‘*composite fermions’’’ [e.g., the quarks and the leptons, excluding, e.g., the proton, neutron, and hyperon composite “particles”], and such that**-**__non__**v****=****2**or**3**, and such that ‘**t****’, with its ‘**_{ALL}**ALL******’ ‘‘‘suffix’’’ component, indicates that the “independent” variable ,**t****, takes on,**_{ALL}**, the value**__successively__**1**, then the value**2**, then the value**3**, then**4**, then, ...,**.**__consecutively__
For

**t**_{ALL}**=****8**, i.e., for cosmological*epoch***8**, per this ‘‘‘equation-model’’’, the RHS [__R__ight-__H__and__S__ide] of this equation, when the**8**-fold ‘‘‘self-involution’’’ [‘‘‘self-multiplication’’’] of_{ALL}**is carried out, generates a**__n__*‘*of**’**__cumulum__**2**^{8}**=****256**category-symbols for the**v****=****2**version of this ‘‘‘equation-model’’’ --

_{ALL}__>____-|-____<___{8}

**=**

_{ALL}

__n__

^{2}

^{8}

**=**

_{ALL}

__n__

^{256}

**=**

_{ALL}

__n__**+**

**. . .**

**+**

_{ALL}

__h__

-- wherein the

**256**th category-symbol,_{ALL}**, connotes the ‘cosmo-ontological category’ of [planetary]**__h__**uman[oid] societies.**__h__
This ‘meta-model’ still
falls short of being

*‘*, in particular, because it does not yet explicitly address so-called “Dark Energy” and “Dark Matter”, which are, it must be said, at present, just barely entering into the**a**’__dialectical__model of everything__now____known__*‘*. Nonetheless,**now known**’**Foundation**researchers are well underway in the work of bringing these new ‘‘‘matters’’’ -- and these new ‘‘‘energies’’’ -- into the very heart of this ‘meta-model’, via a new, deeper «**», and a new, deeper,***archÃ©**‘***first***meta**-*«**»’.***physis*
To afford you a feeling
for this ‘

**ALL**super-domain’*‘*, the image below expands upon our**’**__dialectical__Totality model*‘‘‘*as a whole model, or**’’’**__Dialectic__of Nature*‘*[__Dialectical__Theory of Everything**]’ model, for just the first triad of the***known***v****=****3**version: for just its_{ALL}**t**_{3}**=****1**‘dialectical equation’ --
The version of the

*‘‘‘*meta-equation’’’, or__Dialectical__Theory of Everything*‘*meta-equation’, which is specified, and illustrated, in the next two images, below, is an__Dialectic__of Nature__,__**abbreviated***“***lumped****«****»” version of the***archÃ©*__Encyclopedia Dialectica__*‘*meta-model’ for the ontological-categorial content of the__Dialectic__**of****Nature****of the***totality***just described above.***known universe*
The version described
below

*“*the ontological categories of the ‘pre-/sub-**lumps together**”**uclear’ “particles” versus of the ‘nuclear pre-/**__n__**ub-atomic’ “particles”, or of the ‘‘‘**__s__**on-composite bosons and fermions’’’ versus of the ‘‘‘compo**__n__**ite bosons and fermions’’’, into a single**__s__**, or «***starting category***» ontological category, that of the ‘p***archÃ©***e-atomic’ “particles” [bosons and fermions, non-composite and composite alike].**__r__
Its ‘meta-equation
meta-model’ is --

_{ALL}__>____-|-____<___{tALL}

_{}

**=**

_{ALL}

__r__

^{2}

^{t}

^{ALL}

^{}

-- and, for

**t**_{ALL}**=****7**, i.e., for cosmological*epoch***7**, per its ‘‘‘equation-model’’’, the RHS [__R__ight-__H__and__S__ide] of its equation, when the**7**-fold ‘‘‘self-involution’’’ [‘‘‘self-multiplication’’’] of_{ALL}**is carried out, generates a**__r__*‘*of**’**__cumulum__**2**^{7}**=****128**category-symbols for this,**v****=****2**, version of this ‘‘‘equation-model’’’ --

_{ALL}__>____-|-____<___{7}**=**

_{ALL}

__r__

^{2}

^{7}

**=**

_{ALL}

__r__

^{128}

**=**

_{ALL}

__r__**+ . . . +**

_{ALL}

__h__

-- wherein, in this
case, the

**128**th category-symbol,_{ALL}**, connotes the ‘cosmo-ontological category’ of [planetary]**__h__**uman[oid] societies.**__h__*‘*«

**lumped****»’,**

*archÃ©*__version of this__

**abbreviated***‘*meta-model’ --

**Everything**
The next image depicts
this

__,__**abbreviated***‘*«**lumped****»’ meta-model’s***archÃ©***1**st**2**stages of**, «**__dialectical__**»***aufheben**‘*--**-**__self__**meta**-**monad**-**ization**’The

__N__**and ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ formulation of these psychohistorical-dialectical equations can be rendered, and briefly described, as given below.**

__Q___##
I. The Equation of Human
__I__deology/__K__nowledge Meta-Evolution

**a**. <<

**>>:**

*Arche’***,**

__Mythologies__

__M__**[--->**

__q__**1**.

**b**.

**‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula:**

**<**

__M__>^(**2^**

**t**

**k**

**)**.

**c**. Solution to epoch

**t**

**k**

**=**

**4**:

**<**

__M__>^(**2^**

**4)**=

**<**

__M__>^(**16**

**)**=

__M__**+**

__R__**+**

__q__**R**

**M**

**+**

__P__**+**

__q__**P**

**M**

**+**

__q__**P**

**R**

**+**

__q__

**P****R****M**

**+**

__K__**+**

__q__**K**

**M**

**+**

__q__**K**

**R**

**+**

__q__**K**

**R**

**M**

**+**

__q__**K**

**P**

**+**

__q__**K**

**P**

**M**

**+**

__q__**K**

**P**

**R**

**+**

__q__**K**

**P****R****M**

**+**

__Y__**[--->**

__q__**1**+

__q__**2**+

__q__**3**+

__q__**4**+

__q__**5**+

__q__**6**+

__q__**7**+

__q__**8**+

__q__**9**+

__q__**10**+

__q__**11**+

__q__**12**+

__q__**13**+

__q__**14**+

__q__**15**+

__q__**16**.

**d**. Key categories from the first sixteen categories of the fields/forms of

**can be summarily described using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘**

*human ideology/knowledge***<--->**’ and ‘

**[--->**’ --

__M__**<--->**

**, “Myths-Makings”; “**

__Mythopoeias__**Mythologies**”

**[--->**

__q__**1**.

__R__**<--->**

**, codified / standardized / dogmatized, i.e.,**

__Religions__*‘*

__Meta____-__**’**

__Mythologies__**[--->**

__q__**2**.

__q__**R**

**M**

**<--->**Reconciliations of

__R__**&**

**/ conversions from**

__M__**into**

__M__**, e.g., Ancient Rome’s Pantheon**

__R__**[--->**

__q__**3**.

__P__**<--->**

**, i.e.,**

__Philosophies__*‘*

__Meta____-__**’**

__Religions__**[--->**

__q__**4**.

.

.

.

__q__**P**

**R**

**<--->**

__R__**|**

**reconciliations, even**

__P__

__q__**retrograde**

**R**P**to**

__P__**conversions, e.g., Aquinas’**

__R__

__Summa Theologica__**[--->**

__q__**6**.

.

.

.

**K**

**<--->**

**Scientific**

__K__**nowledges**, i.e.,

*‘*

__Meta____’__

*-***Philosophies**

**[--->**

__q__**8**

**.**

.

.

.

__q__**KP**

**R**

**<--->**Includes

__q__**P**

**R**

**K**retrograde

__K__**|**to

__R__**conversions, e.g., Hegel’s**

__P__

__Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences__**[--->**

__q__**14**.

__q__**KP**

**R****M**

**<--->**Advanced science,

**, subsuming/explaining**

__K__**hilosophy,**

__P__**eligion,**

__R__**&**

**ythology [not yet fully actual on Earth]**

__M__**[--->**

__q__**15**.

**Y**

**<--->**‘‘‘

**Ps**

__Y__**chohistories**’’’, i.e.,

*‘*

__Meta____’, e.g., Marx’s theory__

*-***Sciences**

**[--->**

__q__**16**.

The

*of this*

**first triad**__,__

**reconstructed****'<<**

*historical**>>-ation' of*

**speci***the historical progression of the 'ideo-ontological categories' / kinds of human*

__deologies\__

**I****nowledges in this**

__K__*'*of human

**psycho****historical**__'__**dialectic**__deologies\__

**I****nowledges Form[ation]s [using the Marxian definition of "Ideology"], can be depicted as follows --**

__K__Models Specification --

The next image depicts this meta-model’s

**1**st

**2**stages of

**, «**

__dialectical__**»**

*aufheben**‘*--

**-**__self__**meta**-**monad**-**ization**’
For
more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical
equation’’’, see –

[pp.

**B-09**through**B**-**17**].##
II. The Equation of Human-Social __Forces__
of Production Meta-Evolution.

**a**. <<

**>>: Whole [proto-]**

*Arche’***uman communities**

__h__*[e.g., hunting bands] as Prime Energy Resources for their own Human Societal Self-[Re-]Production,*

__R__**h**

**[--->**

__q__**1**.

*in reverse*.

The deeper/earlier reaches of the ontology of the cosmos become accessible, for human

**ppropriation, as energy**

__A__**esources, in the**

__R__*reverse order*of their formation, and, as such energy

**esources, form the core of the Marxian “social forces of production”.**

__R__We are using the term “energy

**esources” here in a more concretely determinate, more specific, less ahistorically abstract, less reductionist sense of the term ‘‘‘energy’’’ than is usually the case in contemporary discourse.**

__R__**b**.

**‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula:**

**<**

__R__**h**

**>^(**

**2^**

**t**

**f**

**)**.

**c**. Solution to

**t**

**f**

**=**

**4**:

**<**

__R__**h**

**>^(**

**2^**

**4)**=

**<**

__R__**h**

**>^(**

**16**

**)**=

__R__**h**

**+**

__R__**l**

**+**

__R__**l**

**h**

**+**

__R__**b**

**+**

__R__**b**

**h**

**+**

__R__**b**

**l**

**+**

__q__**b**

**l**

**h**

**+**

__R__**e**

**+**

__R__**e**

**h**

**+**

__R__**e**

**l**

**+**

__R__**e**

**l**

**h**

**+**

__R__**e**

**b**

**+**

__R__**e**

**b**

**h**

**+**

__R__**e**

**b**

**l**

**+**

__R__**e**

**b**

**l**

**h**

**+**

__R__**p**

**[--->**

__q__**1**+

__q__**2**+

__q__**3**+

__q__**4**+

__q__**5**+

__q__**6**+

__q__**7**+

__q__**8**+

__q__**9**+

__q__**10**+

__q__**11**+

__q__**12**+

__q__**13**+

__q__**14**+

__q__**15**+

__q__**16**.

**d**. Key categories from the first sixteen categories of

*‘*-- of

**the****existential**-__self__**force****of human society**’*‘*-- can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘

**human**-**societal self**-**reproductive self**-**force**’**<--->**’ and ‘

**[--->**’ --

__R__**h**

**<--->**Entire [proto-]

**uman communities**

__h__*[e.g.,*

**unting**

__h__**ands] as prime**

__b__**esource for predation-based social**

__R__**e-production**

__R__

**[--->**

__q__**1**.

__R__**l**

**<--->**

**Other**proto-

**anguage-based animal societies/ plant communities, as human energy resources**

__l__**[--->**

__q__**2**.

__R__**l**

**h**

**<--->**Reconciliations of

__R__**l**

**&**

__R__**h**/ conversions from

__R__**h**into

__R__**l**

**[--->**

__q__**3**, e.g., herding, husbandry,

**&**horticulture.

__R__**b**

**<--->**

**social animals**

__a__**&**multi-cellular/’meta-

**iotan’ animal bodies, including human slaves’ bodies, as exploited**

__b__
energy

**esources for human societal self-**__R__**eproduction, e.g., draft animals; slave rowers, etc.**__R__**[--->**__q__**4**.
.

.

.

__R__**e**

**<--->**

**ukaryotic cells as energy resources for human societal self-[re-]production**

__e__**[--->**

__q__**8**, e.g., breads, beers,

wines/vinegars/cheeses/jerkies/yogurts/kefirs/pickles/chutneys,
other “spoiled food”/fermented products, as food preservation tech.

.

.

.

__R__**p**

**<--->**

**rokaryotic, e.g., anaerobic, cells as energies for social**

__p__**eproduction [e.g., methane-generating “digesters”]**

__R__

**[--->**

__q__**16**.

**e**. Categories of interest irrupting into possibility in later epochs,

**t**

**f**

**>**

**4**--

__R__**mb**comprises much ancient Roman technology, up to, e.g., U.S. Civil War technology

**[--->**

__q__**36**:

·
Ancient Roman

**-- using stone [***temples***]; “drum cranes” using wood [meta-**__m__**iota,**__b__**], rope [**__b__**],**__b__**&**sinew [**].**__b__
· Ancient Roman waterworks

**-- using stone [***flour mills***]; water [**__m__**], grain [**__m__**], wood [**__b__**], rope [**__b__**], etc.**__b__
·
Ancient Roman

**-- using stone [***aqueducts***]; “drum cranes” using wood [meta-**__m__**iota,**__b__**], rope [**__b__**],**__b__**&**sinew [**].**__b__
·
Ancient Roman

**-- using stone [***glassworks***]; fire [**__m__**], metal [**__m__**] tools, wood [**__m__**] tools**__b__**&**fuels, glass-sand [**], diamond [**__m__**] cutting tools, etc., including to produce unsurpassed “Portland vases” and “caged glass”.**__m__
·

*circa*200 B.C.E.+ Chinese / Japanese*“Magic Mirrors”*-- using metals [**], fire [**__m__**], intensive hand polishing [**__m__**].**__b__
·
17th Century
Japanese <<

**>> doll automatons [mechanical robots] -- using wood [***karakuri***], metal [**__b__**] springs, etc.**__m__
·
Ancient Roman
<<

**>>***ballista***-- using stone missiles [***catapults***]; wood [**__m__**], plant fiber/hair rope [**__b__**],**__b__**&**sinew [**].**__b__
·
Ancient Roman
<<

**>>***hypocaust***-- using stone [***public baths***]; “drum cranes” [**__m__**], wood [**__b__**] parts**__b__**&**fuels,**&**fire [**], water [**__m__**], air [**__m__**], clay [**__m__**] pipes, socializing human beings [**__m__**], etc.:**__h__**<--->**__R__**mbh****[--->**__q__**37**.
·
Bushnell’s

*“*single-occupant proto-submarine, U. S. First Revolutionary War vintage -- tar [**Turtle**”**], wood [**__b__**], cork [**__b__**], flint [**__b__**], glass [**__m__**], lead [**__m__**], steel [**__m__**] bands, trapped water[**__m__**], trapped air [**__m__**], black powder [**__m__**], human-muscle-powered [hand-cranked] propeller [**__m__**].**__b__
·
Confederate

**eight-person crew “fish boat” “torpedo boat”, or “torpedo fish” proto-submarine, vintage U. S. Second Revolutionary [“Civil”] War -- wood [***H. L. Hunley***], rope [**__b__**], rubber [**__b__**], glass [**__b__**], iron [**__m__**], copper [**__m__**] wire, “blue light” pyrotechnic signal flare [**__m__**], trapped water[**__m__**], trapped air [**__m__**], black powder [**__m__**], eight-persons**__m__*“social”*crew, with a seven-persons-hand-cranked propeller [**]:**__h__**<--->**__R__**mbh****[--->**__q__**37**; both steam-powered [**] and electrical motored [**__m__**] propulsion was tried, but failed; there are possible recently-discovered archaeological indications of chemical/molecular battery-powered electrical [**__s__**] torpedo detonation:**__s__**<--->**__R__**smbh****[--->**__q__**165**.

__R__**smh**encompasses much recent

*‘‘‘*technology

**android robotics**’’’

**[--->**

__q__**161**:

·
Tokyo University
of Science, Dr. Hiroshi Kobayashi’s <<

**>>***Saya**android proto**-*, using electronics [**robot****], metals [**__s__**], human behaviors [**__m__**], etc.**__h__

__R__**smeb**encompasses much recent

*‘‘‘*[GMO] technology

**-**__G__enetically**’’’**__M__odified__O__rganisms

**[--->**

__q__**172**:

·
Japanese
interferon-producing GMO silk worms, created using electronics [

**], metals [**__s__**], silk worm**__m__**ukaryotic cell nucleus [**__e__**] DNA [**__e__**], silkworms [**__m__**], etc.**__b__

__R__**sam**encompasses many recent designs for

**luminal interstellar drive engines**

__sub__

**[--->**

__q__**224**:

·
Ion engines,
using electronics [

**], [ionized] atoms [**__s__**], metals parts [**__a__**], etc.**__m__

__R__**nsam**encompasses much now-emergent or speculative technology

**[--->**

__q__**480**:

·
Dr. Robert
Bussard’s “polywell” fusion power reactor, involving photons [

**], atomic [sub-]orbitals’ electrons [**__n__**], ionized [plasma] atoms [**__s__**], and metal parts [**__a__**], etc.**__m__
·
“Stellar Wind Sail”
starship designs, using solar/stellar photon [

**] winds,**__n__**&**/or “particle” winds [**], “atom” [ion] plasma winds [**__s__**], metal parts [**__a__**], etc.**__m__
·

The

Models Specification --

**F**.**.**__E__**. ‘tachyonic meta-phase’**__D__**luminal interstellar-drive design-hypothesis, as described elsewhere, in other**__super__**Foundation**blogs.The

*of this***first triad**__,__**reconstructed****'<<***historical**>>-ation' of***speci***the historical progression of**'''*<<**historically**-*>>***speci***-fic'''*[cf. Marx]*<<***historical**-*>> of the human "social forces of production" [cf. Marx]***species***'*can be depicted as follows --**psycho****historical**__'__**dialectic**Models Specification --

##
III. The Equation of Human-Social __Relations__
of Production Meta-Evolution.

###
a. <<*Arche’*>>: __A__ppropriations [of products
of pre-/extra-human Nature, in “raw” form], __A__ [---> __q__1.

**b**.

**‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula:**

**<**

__A__>^(**2^**

**t**

**r**

**)**.

### c. Solution to epoch tr = 4:

**<**

__A__>^(**2^**

**4)**=

**<**

__A__>^(**16**

**)**=

__A__**+**

__G__**+**

__q__**GA**

**+**

__C__**+**

__q__**CA**

**+**

__q__**CG**

**+**

__q__**CGA**

**+**

__M__**+**

__q__**MA**

**+**

__q__**MG**

**+**

__q__**MGA**

**+**

__q__**MC**

**+**

__q__**MCA**

**+**

__q__**MCG**

**+**

__q__**MCGA**

**+**

__K__**[--->**

__q__**1**+

__q__**2**+

__q__**3**+

__q__**4**+

__q__**5**+

__q__**6**+

__q__**7**+

__q__**8**+

__q__**9**+

__q__**10**+

__q__**11**+

__q__**12**+

__q__**13**+

__q__**14**+

__q__**15**+

__q__**16**.

**d**. Key categories from the first sixteen categories of

*human social relations of societal self-re-production*can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘

**<--->**’ and ‘

**[--->**’ --

__A__**<--->**“

**Raw**”

__A__**ppropriations**, “Predations”

**[--->**

__q__**1**.

__G__**<--->**

__G__**oods Production**, ‘multi-appropriations’ [e.g.,

**burins**from glassy stones]; ‘

__Meta____-__

**’**

__Appropriations__**[--->**

__q__**2**.

__q__**GA**

**<--->**Reconciliations of

__G__**&**

**/ conversions from**

__A__**into**

__A__

__G__**[--->**

__q__**3**, e.g., spears applied in hunting.

__C__**<--->**Bartered

__C__**ommodities**, i.e., ‘

__Meta____-__

**’**

__Goods__**[--->**

__q__**4**.

.

.

.

__M__**<--->**

__M__**onies**, i.e., ‘

__Meta____-__’

**Commodities**

**[--->**

__q__**8**

**.**

.

.

.

__q__**MC**

**<--->**Subsumption of

__C__**ommodities**by

__M__**onies**, i.e.,

__M__**onies**-mediated circulations of

__C__ommodities

**[--->**

__q__**12**.

.

.

.

__K__

**<---> <<**

**, i.e.,**

__K__apitals*>>***‘**

__Meta____-__

**Monies****’**

**[--->**

__q__**16**.

The

*of this*

**first triad**__,__

**reconstructed****'<<**

*historical**>>-ation' of the '''forms of human-social intercourse''' [cf. Marx and Engels,*

**speci**__]__

**The German Ideology**

*'''*<<

**historically**-*>>*

**speci***-fic'''*[cf. Marx]

*<<*

**historical**-*>> of this*

**species***'*, can be depicted as follows --

**psycho****historical**__'__**dialectic****e**. Categories of interest, observed as having, or predicted to, irrupt into possibility in later epochs,

**t**

**r**

**>**

**4**--

__q__**KG**

**<--->**Real subsumption/reshaping of

**oods-production by the <<**

__G__**apital>>-relation;**

__K__**&**including <<

**apital>>**

__K__**oods**

__G__**[--->**

__q__**18**.

__q__**KC**

**<--->**Real subsumption of the

**ommodity-relation by the <<**

__C__**apital>>-relation; includes “**

__K__**ommodity <<**

__C__**apital>>”**

__K__

**[--->**

__q__**20**.

__q__**KM**

**<--->**Real subsumption of the

**oney-relation by the <<**

__M__**apital>>-relation; includes “**

__K__**oney <<**

__M__**apital>>”**

__K__

**[--->**

__q__**24**.

__q__**KK**

**<--->**

__E__**<--->**

__Self__*-*subsumption of the <<

**apital>>-relation; The Generalized ‘**

__K__**quity-arian’ ‘Political-**

__E__**’ of “the associated producers” [Marx], i.e., ‘Democratic Communism’**

__ECONOMIC____DEMOCRACY__

**[--->**

__q__**32**.

Models Specification --

The next image depicts this meta-model’s

**1**st

**2**stages of

**, «**

__dialectical__**»**

*aufheben**‘*--

**-**__self__**meta**-**monad**-**ization**’For more amplitude about 'Political ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY', see –

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion/PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion.htm

For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical equation’’’, see –

For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical equation’’’, see –

[pp.

**B-24**through

**B**-

**38**]

##
IV. The Equation of Human-Social For__m__ation(s)
Meta-Evolution.

**a**. <<

**>>:**

*Arche’***ands/extended families of hunter-gathers/scavengers/foragers/predators,**

__b__

__b__**[--->**

__q__**1**.

**b**.

**‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula:**

**<**

__b__>^(**2^**

**t**

**m**

**)**.

**c**. Solution to epoch

**t**

**m**

**=**

**4**:

**<**

__b__>^(**2^**

**4)**=

**<**

__b__>^(**16**

**)**=

__b__**+**

__c__**+**

__q__**cb**

**+**

__v__**+**

__q__**vb**

**+**

__q__**vc**

**+**

__q__**vcb**

**+**

__f__**+**

__q__**fb**

**+**

__q__**fc**

**+**

__q__**fcb**

**+**

__q__**fv**

**+**

__q__**fvb**

**+**

__q__**fvc**

**+**

__q__**fvcb**

**+**

__s__**[--->**

__q__**1**+

__q__**2**+

__q__**3**+

__q__**4**+

__q__**5**+

__q__**6**+

__q__**7**+

__q__**8**+

__q__**9**+

__q__**10**+

__q__**11**+

__q__**12**+

__q__**13**+

__q__**14**+

__q__**15**+

__q__**16**

**.**

**d**. Key categories from the first sixteen categories of

*human social/**‘*(

**meta**-**geological**’**formation****) can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘**

*s***<--->**’ and ‘

**[--->**’ --

__b__**<--->**

**ands/extended families of hunter-gathers/scavengers/foragers/predators**

__b__**[--->**

__q__**1**.

__c__**<--->**

__c__**amps**, ‘multi-band’ semi-permanent home bases; ‘

__meta____-__

**’**

__bands__**[--->**

__q__**2**.

__q__**cb**

**<--->**Reconciliations/hybridizations of

__c__**&**

**/ conversions from**

__b__**into**

__b__

__c__**[--->**

__q__**3**, e.g., advantaged, expanding

**amps.**

__c__

__v__**<--->**

__v__**illages**, ‘multi-camp’, long-duration settlements, ‘

__meta____-__

**’**

__camps__**[--->**

__q__**4**.

.

.

.

__f__**<--->**

**chie**

__f__**doms**, multi-village, “tribal” domains; ‘

__meta____-__’

**villages****[--->**

__q__**8**.

.

.

.

__s__

**<--->**

**city**-

__s__**tates**, i.e., ‘

__meta____-__’, or ‘

**chiefdom**

__meta____-__’, social formations

**tribal****[--->**

__q__**16**.

The

*of this*

**first triad**__,__

**reconstructed****'<<**

*historical**>>-ation' of*

**speci***the historical progression of*

*'''*<<

**historically**-*>>*

**speci***-fic'''*[cf. Marx]

*<<*

**historical**-*>> of human society in this*

**species***'*of '''human-social formation(s)''' [cf. Marx], can be depicted as follows --

**psycho****historical**__'__**dialectic****e**. Categories of interest, observed as having, or

__to, irrupt into possibility in later epochs,__

**predicted****t**

**m**

**>**

**4**--

__e__

**<--->**

__e__**mpires**, multi-city-state ‘

__meta____-__’

**city**-**states****[--->**

__q__**32**.

__n__

**<--->**

__n__**ation**-

**states**, multi-empire-remnant ‘

__meta____-__’

**empires****[--->**

__q__**64**.

__p__

**<--->**

__p__**lanetary**-

__p__**oli**, multi-nation-state ‘

__meta____-__’ [not yet known extant]

**nation**-**states****[--->**

__q__**128**.

__m__

**<--->**

__m__**ulti**-

__p__**lanetary federations**; ‘

__meta____-__’ [not yet known extant]

**planetary**-**poli****[--->**

__q__**256**.

Models Specification --

The next image depicts
this meta-model’s

**1**st**2**stages of**, «**__dialectical__**»***aufheben**‘*--**-**__self__**meta**-**monad**-**ization**’
For
more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical
equation’’’, see –

Robert Wright,

**:**__NONZERO__**, Pantheon [New York: 2000],***The Logic of Human Destiny*
pp.

**20**,**78**-**92**,**102**,**109**,**110**-**111**,**12**,**113**,**125**,**165**,**353**,**355**,**357**,**363**,**365**,**368**,**376**,**402**, etc.[p.

**B-23**]

[slides

**54**-

**59**]

## V. The Equation of the Human Genome / Human ‘Phenome’ Systematic Dialectic.

**a**. «

**»: The human**

*Arche’***enome, as a mediately[ ‘Darwinianly’]-developing meta-system, from its proto-human origin,**

__G__

__G__**[---)**

__q__**1**.

**b**.

**‘**

__Triad__ic Seldon Function’ Formula:

**(**

__G__)^(**3^1**

**)**.

**c**. Solution to epoch

**t**

**G**

**=**

**1**:

**(**

__G__)^(**3^1**

**)**=

**(**

__G__)^(**3**

**)**=

__G__**+**

__P__**+**

__q__**P**

**G**

**[---)**

__q__**1**+

__q__**2**+

__q__**3**.

**d**. The categories of

*human genomic/human phenomic**‘*can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘systematic-dialectical’ assignment symbols, ‘

**co**-**meta**-**evolution**’**(---)**’ and ‘

**[---)**’ --

__G__**(---)**The ‘meta-evolving’ “human

**enome”**

__G__**[---)**

__q__**1**.

__P__**(---)**The ‘meta- evolving’ ‘human

**henome’ of**

__P__*non-*chromosomal, phenotypic, cultural, “acquired characteristics”

**[---)**

__q__**2**.

__q__**P**

**G**

**(---)**Their ‘‘‘co-meta-evolving’’’ hybrid; the ‘‘‘complex unity’’’ of the human

**henome/human**

__P__**enome**

__G__**[---)**

__q__**3**.

The

*of this Method of Presentation [ =*

**overall triad***'''*] for this progression of

**Systematic****'''**__Dialectic__*'*conceptions of human Nature be depicted as follows --

**ideo**-**ontological**'
For
more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical
equation’’’, see –

## VI. The Equation of the Meta-Evolution of Planetary Human[oid]ities.

**a**. <<

**>>: planetary '**

*Arche’***humanitys**',

__h__**[--->**

__q__**1**.

**b**.

**‘**

__Dyad__ic Seldon Function’ Formula:

**<**

__h__>^(**2^**

**t**

**h**

**)**.

**c**. Solution to epoch

**t**

**h**

**=**

**1**:

**<**

__h__>^(**2^1**

**)**=

**<**

__h__>^(**2**

**)**=

__h__**+**

__delta____-__

**=**

__h__

__h__**+**

__y__

**[--->**

__q__**1**+

__q__**2**.

This predicted, next-epoch '<<

*>>-ation' of*

**gene**

__delta____-__

**=**

__h__**, the next new 'self-hybrid' <<**

__y__*>> of 'cosmo-ontology', can be depicted as follows --*

**genos****d**. The two ‘[psycho]physio-ontological categories’ for this

*meta**-*[

**evolution of planetary human****]**

*oid***equation, and the three**

*ities*

__sub__*-*categories of the second-to-emerge into possibility of those categories, can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘

**<--->**’ and ‘

**[--->**’ --

__h__**<--->**‘planetized’

**‘**

**umanitys’ [or ‘planetized human[oid]ities’]**

__h__**[--->**

__q__**1**.

__delta____-__

__h__**<--->**

__y__**<--->**

*‘*

__meta__*-*humanit

**y**s’

**[--->**

__q__**2**; a ‘taxonomy level

**1**’ «

**» with**

*genos***3**«

**» --**

*species***<**

__g__>^(**3^**

**t**

**g**

**)**=

**<**

__g__>^(**3^1**

**)**=

**<**

__g__>^(**3**

**)**=

__g__**+**

__r__**+**

__q__**r**

**g**

**=**

__g__**+**

__r__**+**

__c__

**[--->**

__q__**1**+

__q__**2**+

__q__**3**--

__g__**<--->**‘

**Thesis**’ <<

**>>:**

*species***‘meta-humanit**

**’ via human-**

__y__**enomic self-re-engineering**

__g__**[--->**

__q__**1**.

__r__**<--->**

*‘*

**Anti****thesis**’ <<

**>>:**

*species***‘meta-humanit**

**’ via android**

__y__**obotics**

__r__**[--->**

__q__**2**.

__q__**r**

**g**

**<--->**

__c__**<--->**

*‘*

**Syn****thesis**’ <<

**>>:**

*species*

*‘‘‘*of

**complex unity**’’’

__r__**&**

**;**

__g__
‘meta-humanit

**’ via**__y__**yborg prosthetics/bionics**__c__**[--->**__q__**3**.The

*of this*

**triad**__,__

**predicted***'<<*

**next**-epoch*>>-ation' of the body-forms <<*

**speci***>> of this new <<*

**species***>> 'cosmo-ontological' category, '*

**genos**__', can be depicted as follows --__

**the meta**-**human**For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical equation’’’, see –

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Dialectic_Ideography_files/DI_Prolegomena-Epitome-24OCT2009.pdf

[p.

**I**-

**19**]

## VII. The Equation of The Psychohistorical Dialectic of the Dialectic Itself.

**a**. <<

**>>:**

*Arche’***ystematic /**

__S__**ynchronic Dialectics,**

__S__

__S__**[--->**

__q__**1**.

**b**. ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula:

**<**

__S__>^(**2^**

**t**

**#**

**)**.

**c**. Solution to epoch

**t**

**#**

**=**

**2**:

**<**

__S__>^(**2^**

**2)**=

**<**

__S__>^(**4**

**)**=

__S__**+**

__q__**SS**

**+**

__q__**SSS**

**+**

__q__**SSSS**

**=**

__q__**S**

**+**

__q__**H**

**+**

__q__**H**

**S**

**+**

__q__**HH**

**=**

__q__**S**

**+**

__q__**D**

**+**

__q__**D**

**S**

**+**

__q__**DD**

**=**

__S__**+**

__H__**+**

__M__**+**

__Y__**[--->**

__q__**1**+

__q__**2**+

__q__**3**+

__q__**4**.

**d**. These four ‘human-historical ideo-ontological’ categories of

__can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘[psycho]historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘__

*Dialectics***<--->**’ and ‘

**[--->**’ --

__S__**<--->**ystematic /

__S__**ynchronic Dialectics,**

__S__

__S__**[--->**

__q__**1**.

__H__**<--->**istorical /

__H__**iachronic Dialectics,**

__D__

__H__**[--->**

__q__**2**.

__M__

**<--->**eta-Systematic /

__M__**iachronico-**

__D__**ynchronic Dialectics,**

__S__

__M__**[--->**

__q__**3**.

__Y__**<--->**Ps

**chohistorical Dialectics,**

__Y__

__Y__**[--->**

__q__**4**.

This

*of the historical <<*

**tetrad***>> of the <<*

**species***>> of*

**genos**__can be depicted as follows --__

**dialectics****‘“**

*Key Challenges*for**Simultaneous**”’

**and**

*‘*

__QUANT__O*-*

__Qual__itative*’*

**Solution****of these**

**7**[

*Meta**-*]

**.**

*Equations***1**. Correlating the different ‘‘‘tempos’’’/temporalities/‘epochalities’ of the

**six**

*psycho*

**[**

__HISTORICAL__

*meta**-*]

**among the**

*equations***seven**[

*meta**-*]

**presented above, since, in general, and given that ‘**

*equations*

_{R}**t**

**(**

**·**

**)**’ denotes a function which converts

**to**

*ordinal times***,**

*real***‘“**

*historical***eal”’**

__R__

**[**

*times***ly, to ‘‘‘**

*real***Rational**-

**Number**

*times**’’’*] --

**{**

_{R}t**(**

**t**

_{I}

_{\K}**)}**~=

**{**

_{R}t**(**

**t**

_{F}**)}**

**~=**

**{**

_{R}t**(**

**t**

_{R}**)}**

**~=**

**{**

_{R}t**(**

**t**

_{m}**)}**

**~=**

**{**

_{R}t**(**

_{ALL}**t**

_{2}**)}**

**~=**

**{**

_{R}t**(**

**t**

_{#}**)}**;

**2**. Modeling the thus coordinated

**itative ‘epochality’ using “continuous” rather than “discrete” arithmetical**

__quant__**of**

*models***ime, e.g., using**

__t__

*time**-*

**value**

_{R}**t**

**in**

*not***W**; i.e., more specifically, using

*time**-*

**value**

_{R}**t**

*in***R**

**| R**

**in**the set of the “

**eal”**

__R__**Numbers**--

**R**contains

_{R}**t**

*not in***W**;

**3**. Re-expressing the

*‘*, or

**-**__qual__ity__meta__**dynamics**’*‘*, of the

**-**__ontology____meta__**dynamics**’

__qual__ifier*-*in these “purely”-

**sums****itative, “purely”-**

__qual__**[**

*ontological*

*meta**-*]

**, more determinately, as ‘‘‘[space-]time varying’’’**

*equations*

*evolution*__state____trajectory__**/**[

*self**-*]

__control__**, with [‘**

__path__dynamics

__meta__finite*’*,

*ontologically**-*

**]**

__r__*evolutionary**‘‘‘*, for

**’’’**__singularities__

*time**-*

**function**-__quant__ifier**ified state-variables and control-parameters, expressed in the higher, later**

__quant__

__dialectical__*-*of combined,

**ideographical languages****and**

*dynamical**‘*[super

**-**__meta__**dynamical**’**-][**

^{z}

*meta**-*]

**, by means of**

*systems**‘*resulting fro

**singularity semantification**’,*m*

*‘*

**ontological****and**

*metrical*

__qual__ifier*’*

*‘*of

**re**-__qual__ification*“*

**standardly**”*‘‘‘*,

**’’’**__un__qualified**ifier(s)-**

__quant__

__only__**[**

*dynamical equations***also by**

*division**-*

**by**-**zero***‘*

**semantification**’**&**‘

**meta**’, via the

*ization*__finit___{ }

_{}

_{}

_{R}

__mu__**+ axioms for the**

**new**

__r__*evolutionary*

*mathematical**‘*of ‘full zero’];

**ideo**-**ontology**’**4**. Facilitated by

**1**.

**&**

**2**.

**&**

**3**., solving this system of

**7**[

*meta**-*]

**‘‘‘**

*equations*__simultaneously__’’’;

**5**.

**the ‘inter-mutual’ interactions among the**

*Modeling***but co-existing actualities described by these**

*ontologically distinct***7**[

*meta**-*]

**, i.e.,**

*equations***the interactions of the actualities described by each such [**

__dialectically__modeling

*meta**-*]

**with the other, co-extant actualities described by each of the other such [**

*equation*

*meta**-*]

**.**

*equations***6**. Deriving a

*single*

*‘*’, unifying all

**-**__super__**meta**-**equation****7**of the [

*meta**-*]

**presented above.**

*equations*
Dialogically yours,

**"**