UPDATE:
‘The Abortion Conundrum’ — A ‘DIALECTICAL SYNTHESIS SOLUTION’ —
Toward
a Dialectical Defeat of the “Life” vs. “Choice”
‘Rocke-Nazi’ Divide-and-Conquer “Antinomy”.
GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.
Dear Reader,
The ruling, ‘Rocke-Nazi’, ‘human anti-humanist’, exterminationist ruling faction
of the capitalist ruling class has set the majority class at each others’
throats, dividing us, and conquering us, for far too long already -- distracting
us from noticing them,
“behind the curtains”, striving, step-by-step, to carry out for their long-planned,
Malthusian, “People
Are Pollution”, “Global Warming” ideologies-based
extermination
of “95%” of us.
[For background
on this ruling faction,
and their ultra-criminal plans, see, for example –
Capitalism's
Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: Plutocracy Publicly Proclaims Planned
Planetary Population Plummeting. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.
(capitalismsfundamentalflaw-wayforward.blogspot.com)].
The further-updated JPG text, posted below, presents the third
draft of our proposed ‘Reproductive Equity’ Amendment to the Constitution
of the United States of America, offered -- in coordination with our
two other proposed ‘‘‘Equitist’’’ Amendments -- as Article of Amendment # 30.
The “Right to Live” versus “Right to Choose” controversy is not
only driven via ‘ideology-engineering’ and ‘divide-and-conquer engineering’ by
the ‘Rocke-Nazis’.
It is so effective as a ‘divide-and-conquer’ tool for them, precisely because there is a genuine
dialectical contradiction – even an apparent ‘Kantianoid’ “antinomy” – within the advanced conception of the totality of human
rights that humanity has only rather recently achieved. Thus --
Thesis: The people and their
government are morally obligated to protect the “right to live” of Citizens,
e.g., against the crime of murder, a duty which extends to protecting the life of each
yet-to-be born but gestating human being and ‘proto-Citizen’. They must therefore criminalize abortion, the crime of a mother killing her unborn baby, as a most heinous and grisly form of murder.
Anti-Thesis: The mother of that
unborn child has the sovereign right to the disposition of her own body, and
thus of all and any of its parts. That fetus,
during its gestation, is merely just another part of her body, and nourished
entirely by her body alone. She should therefore
have the absolute right to dispose of her unborn child in any way that she sees
fit, in any way that she chooses, with no interferences from governments.
Synthesis: The third-draft constitutional amendment, posted below, locates
a ‘complex unity’ [cf. Hegel] of the above-stated, opposing,
mutually-contradictory propositions, and proposes, on that basis, a dialectical
synthesis of the two antithetical propositions and positions, in the form of a
constitutional amendment – an amendment to the law of the land.
We urge you to consider this updated, third-draft
amendment, to improve upon it, and to campaign for its constitutional adoption,
as so improved, so that the majority class can stop warring within itself,
especially over this “life” vs. “choice” apparent antinomy, and can turn our attention instead to defeating the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ exterminationist pogrom, e.g., by non-violently and constitutionally
establishing ‘Equitist political-economic democracy’ as a higher successor system to the capitalist system.
For ongoing
updates regarding
F.E.D. content, please
see -- www.dialectics.info .
For F.E.D.’s dialectically-illustrated books, and for partially pictographical,
‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’
-- see:
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];
Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
