A Dialectic in the Foundation of the United States Federal Constitution. Part 6.: Cases of Dialectic Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Dialectic

 

in the

 

Foundation

 

of the

 

United States

 

Federal Constitution.

 

Part 6.:

 

Cases of Dialectic Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

In the extended dialogues that led to the promulgation of the Federal Constitution of the United States of America, there was intense internal disputation regarding the design of the federal legislative body, with the example of the British imperialist Parliament in mind, and with the goal of negating that model, in a new model, of a ‘king-less neo-parliament’.

 

One faction of this fierce opposition wanted a “uni-cameral”, or “one-house”, federal legislature, in which each of the federating, former-colonial states would have Equal representation in terms of number of representatives for each colony in that legislative body, making the federation of states a federation of equals.

 

An opposing faction fought for a federal legislature in which each federating, former colony would be represented, in terms of the number of its representatives, in proportion to its Population.  Thereby, each United States citizen would enjoy approximately the same per capita representational “weight” in the federal legislature.

 

It was a kind of dialectical categorial synthesis – no doubt largely unrecognized as such – that saved that constitutional-design dialogue from deadlock. 

 

That synthesis designed the federal legislature to constitute, de facto, a dialectical complex unity of the two legislature design principles noted above. 

 

The legislature of the federal government of the United States, as a single legislative unit, was to be a “bi-cameral”, or “two-house”, legislative unit, combining and integrating a “House of Representatives”, with the number of its representatives for each constituent state reflecting the citizens-population of that state, in ‘intra-duality’ with a “Senate”, with an equal “weight” of exactly two citizen-representatives for each constituent state of the United States, regardless of the population of that state relative to the populations of the other constituent states in that federation of states, together forming the single citizens-representative legislature of that united federation of states.

 

That was the theory for a citizens-representative federal legislature that resulted from those constitutional deliberations. 

 

Factors such as a growing plutocracy, with capital-money resources enabling it to lobby that legislature, and to “buy” legislation, & the complications of a political-economic system of “latifundial” agricultural chattel slavery in the southern colonies, plus other practical realities, have put that theory to the test ever since.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Ambiguity – the ‘Intra-Duality’ – of “PROGRESS” in the Capitalist Epoch...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Ambiguity –

 

the ‘Intra-Duality’ –

 

of

 

“PROGRESS”

 

in the Capitalist Epoch:

 

The contradictory combination

of

productive-forces social progress

and

social immiseration [social alienation]

in the capitalist epoch.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

In the epoch of “capital-relation” predominance – the epoch of the global dominance of ‘the capital/wage-labor social relation of [expanding societal self-re-]production’ – the liberating benefits of progress in the growth of the ‘capital-form’ social forces of [expanding societal self-re-]production, i.e., of the rapidly-rising ‘self-productivity of human socio-mass’, of human lives and of human artifacts-mass alike, is ineluctably accompanied by a contrary and ‘‘‘orthogonal’’’ accelerating growth of human social alienation.

 

This latter kind of “growth” is not only a growth of human self-alienation as ‘self-selling’, e.g., as the wage-labor relation in which the majority class of human social individuals sell-away the use and purpose of their lives to capital, to capital-owning employers, who apply their life-time and their creative power to the pursuit of profits, no matter how high the social and human cost of that pursuit, e.g., in its production of deadly pollution, etc., externalities, etc.

 

 

The consequences of capitalist social alienation also include the increasing acid-like dissolution of all remaining vestiges of human ancestral solidarity and communality, the rendering of ‘‘‘cash payment as, increasingly, the only remaining nexus between human being and human being’’’.  

First, extended families increasingly dissolve, until all that remains is the “nuclear family”.  Then, nuclear families increasingly dissolve, in divorces, etc., under the pressures of growing capitalist alienation.  

Then, even nuclear families themselves increasingly fail even to form.  More and more of the majority class live alone, in isolated, single-person households, with men and women increasingly estranged, and failing to reproduce, under the depredations of the anti-humanist, anti-population, ‘humanocidal’ ideological and standards-of-living-destroying depredations of the ‘descendence-phase’, ‘human anti-humanist’, ‘capitalist anti-capitalist’ ruling faction, of the ‘de-industrialization’ phase of the capitalist ruling class historical agenda, the ‘humanocidal’ agenda of what we name the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ faction.

 

The ‘Rocke-Nazis’ exploit this ambiguity of human social progress under the capitalist system to attempt to dupe you into believing that there is no such thing as progress, that progress – any progress at all – is impossible, and, thereby, to dupe you into hopelessness, and, eventually, into a suicidal depression, or at least into an abject, prostrate capitulation to their ‘humanocidal’ agenda: that you had better submit to their planned “95%” extermination of humanity, of you and your family, in order to save “Nature” [i.e., their power], because only “Nature” [i.e., their power], and not anything of human Nature, is worth saving.  For evidence of this, see –

 

Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: 'Rocke-Nazi' Plutocracy Publicly Proclaims Planned Planetary Population Plummeting. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

– and see also, for example, a recent article, by an attempted but inept “journalist”; a would-be ‘Rocke-Nazi’ whore, attempts to copy-cat standard ‘Rocke-Nazi’ tropes, in his ideologically too-transparent, over-the-top attempt to ingratiate himself with the ‘Rocke-Nazis’, and, thereby, to garner employment by them –

“Scientists say the universe is getting worse and worse”, MSN “science” news, 16 November 2025:

Scientists say the universe is getting worse and worse.

 

The ‘Rocke-Nazis’ exploit this felt ambiguity, of human social progress and growing social alienation under the capitalist system, in their “hope” to push their ‘humanocidal’ global pogrom false solution to this capitalist ‘contra-kinesis’, “hoping” to block contemporary humanity from realizing and achieving the true solution: the concrete self-transcendence of humanity as ‘capitalism incarnate’ – of capital/wage-labor humanity – in the global establishment of ‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION –

 

‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’; 

 

BOOK:

 

MARX’S MISSING BLUEPRINTS

Free-of-Charge Download of Book PDF –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marx: “The Development of the Social Individual”; an Amendment.

 

Marx:

 

 “The Development

 

of the

 

Social Individual”;

 

 

an Amendment.

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

We wish to propose, as illustrated in the diagram posted above, an amendment to Marx’s “Productive forces and social relationships – the two different sides of the development of the social individual – appear to be, and are, for capital, only a means, to enable it to produce from its own cramped base.  But in fact they are the material conditions that will shatter this foundation…”

[David McLellan, The Grundrisse: Karl Marx, Harper & Row, NY, 1971, p. 148].

 

 

We hold that there are, not just two, but four fundamental dimensions of the historical development of the human-social individual that should be highlighted in any apt contemporary extension of Marxian theory, that is adequate to the growth of scientific knowledge since Marx’s time. 

 

Those four dimensions are –

 

1.  Yes, the history of the ‘social self-force of human-societal self-re-production’: “productive forces” or “technologies [of human life-expansion]” for short;

 

2. Yes, the ‘social relations of human-societal self-re-production’: “social relationships”, or [the history of human] “livelihood relations” for short;

 

3.  But also: the history of human social formations, and;

 

4.  The [psycho]history of human ideologies\knowledges.

 

These four “sides” of the development of the human-social individual, as depicted above, are shown as four historical-dialectical categorial progressions, radiating from the four ‘‘‘poles’’’ – two horizontal and two vertical – of the social-individual ‘“core”’ of this diagram.

 

The «arché» category, and the subsequent ‘self-hybrid’ ontological categories, to-date, of these four Domains of dialectical categorial progression, are, we hold –

 

A.  Social Formations:

1.  «arché» category: b, for hunter-gatherer bands;

2.  c, for hunter-gatherer camps;

3.  v, for agricultural villages;

4.  f, for multi-village chiefdoms;

5.  s, city-states;

6.  e, for multi-city-state, ancient empires;

7.  n, for nation-states.    

 

B.  Livelihood Relations 

[“social relations of production”]:

1.  «arché» category: A, for raw-Nature Appropriations [e.g., hunter-gatherer-scavenger foraging and cannibalism];

2.  G, for human-labor-modified Nature, i.e. Goods/Gifts;

3.  C, for bartered Commodities;

4.  M, for commodity-exchange-mediating Monies;

5.  K, for money-profits-targeting «Kapitals».

 

C.  Society-Expanding Technologies 

[“Productive Forces”]:

1.  «arché»: h, human communities’ cooperative labor as energy-resource [e.g., communal hunting and gathering];

2.  l, social animals as energy-resources 

[e.g., herding];

3.  b, de-socialized multi[-eukaryotic-]cellular bodies as energy-resources, e.g., human slavery 

[and ‘animal slavery’];

4.  e, eukaryotic cells as energy-resources 

[e.g., yeast cells for our “daily bread”, as well as for beers and wines];

5.  p, prokaryotic cells as energy-resources 

[e.g., bacteria-based cheeses – technologies for food preservation];

6.  m, molecules as energy-resources 

[e.g., natural gas];

7.  a, atoms as energy-resources [e.g., atomic power].    

 

D.  Ideologies\Knowledges:

1.  «arché» category: L for [initially only spoken] Languages;

2.  A, for [e.g., initially only cave-wall, petroglyph & figurine] Arts;

3.  M, for the story-units of Mythopoeias, or Mythologies;

4.  R, for doctrinaire, dogmatic Religions;

5.  P, for speculative Philosophies; 

philosophical schools;

6.  K, for observationally/experimentally corroborated

     Knowledges [e.g., sciences];

 

Of course, it must be admitted that, while each of these progressions, within each of these four dimensions of the human-social individual, and of the development thereof in human history, is relatively distinct and autonomous, and is worthwhile to take notice of, separately, all are, as well, ultimately driven by, and predicated upon, just one of them – on the growth of “the social forces of production” [Marx].

 

This is so, in a subtlest form, even for the [psycho-] historical development of ideologies\knowledges.

 

And, also of course, each of these four distinct ontological-dialectical progressions interacts with each of the others, in exceedingly complex ways.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!