Full Title --
Part 6 of 9. Seldonian, Dialectical-Algebraic Derivation of Fundamental Features for the
Global Successor System to [Self-]Global[ized] Capitalism,
using the Dialectical ‘Meta-Equation’ that Models
the ‘Meta-Evolution’ of the Human-Social
Relations of Production.
by [guest author] Hermes de Nemores.
Dear Reader,
Questions have recently been raised, in ‘www’ dialogues in which I have participated, as to what Karl Seldon derived, and also as to how he derived it, with regard to the global system of ‘Democratic Communism’, or of ‘Marxian Democracy’ -- of ‘Political-Economic Democracy’ -- as the possible global successor system to the global capitalist system, using the algebra of dialectics that that he discovered in 1996.
Questions have recently been raised, in ‘www’ dialogues in which I have participated, as to what Karl Seldon derived, and also as to how he derived it, with regard to the global system of ‘Democratic Communism’, or of ‘Marxian Democracy’ -- of ‘Political-Economic Democracy’ -- as the possible global successor system to the global capitalist system, using the algebra of dialectics that that he discovered in 1996.
Such questions deserve an answer.
Thisblog-entry summarizes the sixth part of
Seldon’s answer.
This blog-entry was extracted from writings of
Hermes de Nemores, Secretary-General of Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica,
and chairperson of its General Council, from his recent update to an
introductory text, whose earlier version is available via the following links
--
[see, in particular, pages B-24 to B-37 in the latter].
-- and which I have adapted to the locally-available
typography.
Enjoy this sixth part of Hermes de Nemores’ re-telling of
Seldon’s amazing saga of solution!
Regards,
Miguel
Miguel
Example 5: NQ Psychohistorical-Dialectical ‘Meta-Model’. The ‘Meta-Equation’
of Human-Social Relations of
Production ‘Meta-Evolution’
[Part 6 of 9].
The Econo-Political Institutional
Infrastructure of the Initial Phase of 'Externality-Equities' Equitism. 'Equitism' envisions the
constitutional-amendment provision and partially courts-regulated and legislatures-regulated
operation of 'bicameral' boards of directors in all capitalist enterprises of
sufficient size and social impact, with a 'second house' of local-community-elected public
directors in
all local operating units of such enterprises.
These 'publics' boards' would have constitutionally-ceded
authority, and legislatively-ceded authority, over the 'externalities budgets', the 'quanto-qualitative', externalities-production local annual operating plans of
these enterprises -- thus representing, at the very heart of corporate
governance, the 'externality-equities' owned
collectively, in a collective
property-rights
or public property-rights application of the "Coase Theorem",
by each such
local-community's citizens, as public stakeholders,
in virtue of this, their new and
special kind of property right.
The traditional board of
directors and its delegates, representing the ownership of 'internality-equities' by the traditional stockholders, would continue to
have authority over the dollar-denominated, financial annual operating
plan.
Discrepancies between the two
operating plans would have to be negotiated between the two "houses"
in accord with the constitutionally and legislatively mandated rules, with
constitutionally and legislatively prescribed judicial review and/or
arbitration in the event of deadlock/negotiation-failure.
Any effort by the plutocracy to
bribe the thousands of grass-roots public
directors popularly elected in local communities all across the
landscape would face prohibitive costs and risks of exposure because of their
vast multiplicity.
Such massive bribery would be
rendered more difficult also by the fact that the locally-resident
citizens eligible to be elected as public
directors would be fighting to defend their families, their
homes, and their local communities in a way and from a vantage which would be
very non-abstract, very direct and personal, compared to the vantage of the
traditional long-distance central government legislator.
In any case, attempts by the plutocracy
and/or their subordinate capitalist-class elements to buy-off the vast number
of citizen-directors
nationwide would break the bribery budgets of even the super-richest of the
super-rich.
The Emergence of a Global 'Association
of Public Directors'. It is expected that Associations
of Public Directors, coordinating policy at the local, regional,
and national levels, and, eventually, at the international, planetary level,
will "naturally" tend to emerge over time, perhaps initially as a
kind of NGO [Non-Governmental Organization], and to eventually become
institutionalized, 'constitutionalized', and 'electorialized'.
This will create a situation of
"dual power" between the political-economic 'Association of Associations' and the traditional political
branches.
But this should not be posed as
one of unstable
"dual power", leading inevitably to the "total victory" of
one of the 'duals', and the "total annihilation"/"abstract
negation" of the other.
Rather, it should be grasped as
the basis for a new, fourth branch of government
-- of a partially democratized economic
governance branch
-- and of an «aufheben» conservation/elevation/negation
, and ‘real subsumption’, of the
first three branches of political government, leading to a
government of sustained quadruple power,
with the new, democratic economic governance branch
existing in a higher, stabilized, ongoing complex unity with the three earlier branches, supplying economic checks and balances that the political branches cannot supply,
and that help to block the path, otherwise irresistible, toward their total
prostitution and plutocratic totalitarian degeneration.
'Containment' and '''Real Subsumption''' of the Capital-Relation within the Relation of Generalized Equity. These Associations of
Public Directors would supply a geography-based externalities 'container' and 'constrainer' for the
many individual capitals operating in a given locality or
region, capitals otherwise
overwhelmingly '''abstracted''' and geographically
indifferent; indifferent to the
deleterious impacts of the externalities they generate on their local portions
of humanity.
These Associations
would thus constitute the units,
or «monads»,
of a 'Meta-Capital' entity,
each such «monad»
'made up out of'
a heterogeneous multiplicity of capitals
in a democratic-jurisdictional sense.
hese Associations
would geo-demographically 'contain' and 'internalize/subsume' the
many capitals operating within their geographical jurisdictions, in terms of, and placing checks and balances upon, the
otherwise unlimited production of externalities
which the combination of gargantuan oligopolist agglomerations of capital, their monopolized/prostituted
mass media of communication, and their prostitute, increasingly
'''plutocracy-owned''' political governments would unleash.
The "pure" private capital
principle
is a principle of private profit maximization at
any social/externality cost.
It is limited, within the epoch
of the «Kapitals»-system, only by political checks, i.e., by economically-exteriorized,
government legislature/bureaucracy regulation, and litigation-triggered
judicial intervention, in a context where these branches of government are
increasingly prostituted to a few, dominant agglomerations of
internationalizing capital-ownership.
The 'Terminality' of the 'Un-Contained' Capital-Principle. Thus the capital principle,
when in its full development, at zenith -- if not integrated within a higher
socio-economic principle, i.e., if it moves to become the organizing principle
of global society as a whole; of the human-social totality, will become a
principle of monopolistic, omni-ravenous, socially-cannibalistic rapacity and parasitic malignancy; of unchecked, "absolute", and
therefore "absolutely corrupt" power, which will
ravage and destroy the totality of human society, the human species,
and the planetary biosphere as a whole, in a vain defense of its
power-prerogatives, once it becomes mortally threatened by the further growth
of the productive forces immanent in the improvement of majority standards of
living, including standards of [scientific and technological, etc.] education,
world-wide, which standards it therefore
systematically attacks.
The «Aufheben» [Self-]Negation of the Capital-Relation as Predominant Social
Relation of Production. This meta-model, for E, predicts no undialectical, abstract
negation of
the «Kapitals» ontology; no 'Jacobinoid-Leninoid' "absolute abolition"; no 'convolute' extinction/total
de-manifestation, and no fantasy, utopian de-materialization of the
Capital-relation.
The social praxis ontology of
'Raw Appropriation' did not vanish/was not abolished by the
emergence of that of Goods.
The Goods ontology did not vanish/was
not abolished by the emergence of that of Commodity barter.
The Commodity ontology did not
vanish/was not abolished by the emergence of that of Money.
The Money ontology did not
disappear/was not abolished by the emergence of that of «Kapitals».
This model anticipates, in
continuity with all of these earlier 'meta-evolutionary' transitions
identified in this ‘meta-model’, the dialectical, «aufheben» 'annulment-cum-elevation-cum-conservation' of the
Capital-relation, via an appropriate 'containment' of, or 'self-internalization' by, and [self-]subsumption/"real
domination" of Capital
within the higher social principle of 'Generalized
Equity',
as sketched above.
The latter principle was
already interior to
the 'equity' and 'exchange-of-equivalents'
sub-principles immanent in Capital,
as its implicit and internal dual.
The Emergence of a Fourth, Economic-Democratic
Branch
of Econo-Political Democratic Social Governance, in Sustained Quadruple Power with the Earlier Three. This model thus envisions the retention
and
conservation/transformation of the three traditional branches of political government
in a complex,
conflictual, and conflicts-conserving unity of sustained
quadruple-power
with the new, fourth branch, generalizing the
stabilized, conflicts-conserving, checks-and-balances delivering complex unity of the
original three.
It also envisions the
subordination, but not the dissolution, of the
capital-principle.
The
capital-principle
is no longer allowed to attempt to organize the social totality.
A higher
and economic-democratic, humanistic, social
justice based principle of social ordering supersedes Capital
in that role --the principle of 'Generalized
Equity'.
SOLUTION –
‘Equitist
Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’;
BOOK:
MARX’S MISSING
BLUEPRINTS
Free of Charge Download
of Book PDF --
http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html
Hardcover Book Order --
http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html
No comments:
Post a Comment