The transcript of "Exchange #2" in a new, 'multi-exchange' dialogue on extended Marxian Dialectics, has recently been posted to the www.dialectics.org website, as a new entry within Aoristos's Blog.
I have also posted the -- very rich and thorough! -- question that opens this second exchange here, below, for your convenience.
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison
So how is it your method and prognostications are able to be more accurate and certain, not only more than Marx, but more than what is perceived to be possible in the social sciences of our day? Or do I misunderstand you? Is precise prediction and intervention with a mind to push us to a more favorable probable future more of a metaphor, where the emphasis is really on transformation to a more qualitatively different possible future, and therefore not literally a matter of exact predictive science?