Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: ‘NOTHING LEFT'. “DOT” #12 of 12: “CONNECTING THE DOTS” SERIES.

“DOTS” SERIES -- “DOT” #12 of 12:

‘NOTHING LEFT’.

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

Dear Reader,

This series, entitled “DOTS” -- as in “connect the dots” -- is intended to provide you with ‘evidentiary excerpts’ from the many years of research, by Karl Seldon, initially, and, later, by the Foundation, on the ‘‘‘lawful’’’ [as in “law-of-value”-‘‘‘lawful’’’] but secret global agenda and strategy of the ‘descendence phase’ capitalist ruling class.

We plan to present these excerpts here, within this series, together with their source references, usually without any commentary, by us, as to how we “connect” these “dots”, to give you, our reader, the chance to make your “connections” on your own.

We will, generally, set forth our ‘GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES’, giving our version of the interconnections of these “dots”, and our hypotheses to explain these “dots”, elsewhere. Some of our hypotheses such are already extant in past entries to this blog. Only in the final few blog-entries of this series will we comment on our views as to this vast interconnection.

“DOTS” Series [as in “connecting the dots”.] -- “DOT” #12 of 12:

“Nothing Left” vs. Real Hope --

Opening Quotation -- from the “Soviet” “Left”. The following quote is from Mikhail Gorbachev, and leaves little doubt as to who his real employers have been, and as to whose “party line” he upholds:

“...the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.” [ http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1479057 ].

Commentary. No doubt it is a vestige of Gorbachev’s “socialist” culture, and of his “socialist-humanist” upbringing, that lead him to want to spare a further 5% of humanity, and to call for only a 90% human population reduction, vis-à-vis a more “tough-minded”, “entrepreneurial” capitalist like Ted Turner, who wants to murder all 95%. [Note: Ted Turner, “nevertheless”, “generously donated” to Gorbachev’s organization].

In his courageous 2012 book Merchants of Despair: Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudo-Scientists, and the Fatal Cult of Anti-Humanism, Robert Zubrin, founder of the Mars Society, in his chapter 10, entitled “The Betrayal of the Left”, wrote as follows --

[from pp. 125-127]:

“The American left has a proud history of struggle to advance the human condition. It fought for Independence and the Bill of Rights, against slavery and child labor, for the eight-hour day, the minimum wage, factory and mine safety, public schools, rural electrification, and the right to organize unions.”

“It militantly opposed Nazism, some of its members going so far as to volunteer to fight Hitler in Spain long before the rest of the country got involved. During the 1960s, it was in the forefront of the civil rights movement and led the effort to stop the Vietnam War. Many of its efforts are universally acknowledged today as great contributions to America.”

“Others remain controversial. It certainly has not always been right.”

“Its economic prescriptions have often been incompetent and its long willful blindness to the evils of [“]Soviet[”] communism [Ed.: I.e., Stalinist state-capitalism] was shameful.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“It was very disturbing to many American leftists when people started showing up at their meetings in the late 1960s insisting that they take up the cause of population control. This was a complete break from the left’s traditions and commitments.”

“Since the days of Henry George and Friedrich Engels, American leftist had always been vehemently opposed to Malthusianism, which they correctly understood as a reactionary racist doctrine conceived for the purpose of denying the just aspirations of working people.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“But now, descending upon the meetings of the Students for a Democratic Society (the grab-bag organization for Sixties campus radicals) came the acolytes of Paul Ehrlich. Instead of The Grapes of Wrath, they carried copies of The Population Bomb. Instead of voting rights for minorities, they wanted to give them abortions. Instead of ... “Power to the people,” their slogan was “People pollute.” [Ed.: or even “People ARE Pollution”].

“At first they met resistance. The Marxists rushed reprints of their founding fathers’ ant-Malthusian tracts back into publication. ...The Christian radical Richard Neuhaus, pastor of the Lutheran Church of St. John the Evangelist in Brooklyn and founder of National Clergy and Laymen Concerned About Vietnam, wrote an entire book blasting Ehrlich and the [“]ecology[”] movement for their flagrant antihumanism.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“Entitled Defense of People: Ecology and the Seduction of Radicalism, the book makes poignant reading today, recalling as it does the waning moments of an era when the left stood up for human beings.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

[pp. 128-129]: “But neither...the elegant polemics of Neuhaus, nor even the cries of outrage from the left’s own...heroes could hold the line against a massive public-relations campaign that was transforming the entirety of America’s intellectual atmosphere.”

“Ramparts magazine, the flagship high-gloss mass-circulation gold standard for radical politics, devoted an entire issue to [“]ecology[”], including as its cover story “Eco-Catastrophe”, the article...by Paul Ehrlich predicting the death of the ocean and even the exhaustion of Earth’s oxygen supply unless forceful measures were taken immediately to suppress population and industrial growth.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“In parallel with the promotions of the Ehrlich cult, Hugh Moore and William Draper stepped up the work of their Campaign to Check the Population Explosion, distributing hundreds of thousands of pamphlets and placing dozens of full-page ads in major newspapers signed by Nobel Prize recipients and liberal luminaries demanding immediate action to stop the “population explosion”.”

“Building on this, Moore and his media consultants conceived the project of launching population control as a mass movement by making it the central plank of a “National Environmental Teach-In’, or “Earth Day” nationwide rally on April 22, 1970, orchestrated by Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson... . No expense was spared on this coming-out party for the new anti-human movement.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“[pp. 130-132]: Large corporate donations flowed in to help the organizing effort, which was seen in some establishment circles—including that of President Nixon—as an excellent way to divert radicals from less convenient activity. As Earth Day approached, it became apparent that it was going to be a very big affair. Rather than be left on the sidelines of the new [“]radicalization[”], leaders of the various left-wing organizations decided to “go where [“]the people[”] are at” and jump on the band wagon.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels had called upon the working class to take power -- not to stop the industrial revolution unleashed by capitalism, but to carry it further.” [Ed.: i.e., to carry far further the sustained growth of human-societal self-re-productivity, meaning the further growth of the ‘Meta-Darwinian Fitness’ of the human species -- “the growth of the social forces of production” [Marx].]

“But now, embracing the Malthusian cause, America’s leftist leaders offered the services of [“]socialism[”] as the most efficient agent for imposing zero-growth.” [Ed.: i.e., catastrophic negative growth of the global human economy and population.]. [Ed.: Emphases added].

“In his 1941 classic [song], “Roll On, Columbia, Roll On”, leftist balladeer Woody Guthrie had sung the praises of hydroelectric dams whose “power is turning our darkness into dawn.” No more. Henceforth the role of the peoples’ [“]tribunes[”] to tell their clients that the time had come to turn out the lights.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“Many on the left were appalled by the betrayal. One of these dismayed individuals was Allan Chase, and old-school left-wing journalist who had cut his teeth exposing Axis operations in Latin America during the 1940s. In his magisterial book The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the New [“]Scientific[”] Racism, written a few years later, Chase gives some sense of the disgust he and others like him felt as they watched the travesty unfold:

“By 1970, thousands of earnest and idealistic Americans of all ages were swapping their “End the Killing in Vietnam” buttons for more [“]modish[”] buttons bearing the words “People Pollute.” [Ed.: or “People ARE Pollution”]. The greatest peace movement ever created in America, a coalition of young people powerful enough to have driven Lyndon Johnson out of public life in 1968, now committed hara-kiri on national network television in the name of the revival of Malthusianism. . . .”

“But Chase’s cri de coeur was of little avail. The left had sold out.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“Henceforth its legions of writers, organizers, and demonstrators would be at the disposal of the Malthusians.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

“Henceforth genocide would be “progressive.” [Ed.: Emphases added].

Series Summary Commentary.

The Science that Integrates these DOTS. There remains a far bigger mystery -- far bigger than that of the sudden reversal of stance on Nazism by the U.S./U.K., ‘Rockefeller Faction’ ruling class, circa 1939: a far bigger mystery that we have not here so far addressed.

This is the mystery of what extreme threat to their power was so extreme -- was extreme enough -- to have driven, and to still be driving, by now several generations of that ruling class faction to consistently, and ever-more extremely, pursue the most extreme agenda of “eugenics”, the agenda of exterminating “95%” [cf. Ted Turner, et al.] of the human race.

The threat that a rising Germany posed to the U.S./U.K. ruling faction’s global power, and to all of the hyper-perverted “perks” of that power, and the even greater threat that the rise of a German/Russian alliance would likewise have posed to that power and to those “perks”, far more dangerously than the threat of the rise of Germany alone, might be regarded as a relatively “external threat” to the U.S./U.K. core of the ruling faction.

However, that threat essentially ended with the integration of Germany into the core of the E.U., and yet, the extremity of the ‘humanocidal’ policies pursued by that ruling faction has only deepened since that integration.

But the “core” geographical regions of original industrial capitalist development should not be abstractly extracted from the “lawful” development of the global capitalist system as a whole, and of its world market, which includes the geographical periphery and semi-periphery of that development, and of that world marked. Otherwise a vast misunderstanding of that global and self-globalizing system will be produced, as a consequence of that fallacious abstraction.

Instead, the co-rising of Germany and Russia was always but one more example of a threat to legacy ruling class power, a threat to the global reach of the ruling class of the original core regions of industrial capitalist development, that arises as an internal threat, inside the expanding global capitalist system, given the inherently uneven progress of capitalist industrialization, that “lawfully” creates a capitalist core, semi-periphery, and periphery to that development in the first place.

The problem of the rise of Germany and of Russia forms but one special case of that general threat, to legacy/core ruling class power, of the rise of the semi-peripheral regions, and of the entire peripheral region, of capitalist development itself, into capitalist industrialization.

Left unimpeded, the industrial development of this non-core region of the capitalist global system would typically present competition, to the core ruling class’s legacy fixed capital plant and equipment, from the latest, cheapest, most technologically advanced, most productive capital plant and equipment, combined with initially lower wage labor costs. In that combination, this competition would quickly lower the world market prices of industrial products, and thereby drive down the profitability of, and soon bankrupt, the core legacy industries, devaluing their obsolescent capital plant and equipment to scrap value, and overthrowing the economic, capital base of the power of the geographical core ruling class, while fueling the rise of a new, successor industrial capitalist ruling class in the periphery and semi-periphery.

The core, U.S./U.K. ruling class initially “solved” the problem of this threat to their power, as we noted earlier in this series, by massively reversing and otherwise impeding “normal” capitalist industrial development throughout the periphery -- via, in key part, the 1913-imposed income tax, as a way to get the working class, and the lower capitalist class, to pay for the arms shipments, and the “perks”, etc., necessary for the reversal of industrial development, and for the suppression of productivity growth, and of scientific and technological advancement in general, throughout the periphery, by means of comprador military dictatorships, ‘servant dictatorships’ -- servants to their legacy ruling class paymasters, brutal, progress-reversing dictators to their own people.

But, at length, that “solution” has failed.

Especially since circa 1989, industrialization has “taken off”, albeit to varying degrees, in the “B.R.I.C.S.” -- in China, in India, in Brazil, in South Africa, in Russia -- despite the “best efforts” of the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ to destroy or pervert that progress.

And, as a consequence, the working class, overall, globally, is rising, despite the Rockefeller Faction’s “successes”, especially since circa 1989, in reversing the progress of, and in destroying the lives and the livelihoods of, the working classes in the U.S. and the U.K.

All over the world, ‘working/middle classes’ are rising. And such middle classes have a tendency to, over time, demand reforms that lead -- ultimately irresistibly -- toward popular sovereignty and popular democracy -- unless those millions of new skilled and educated people can be quickly eliminated, e.g., by ‘The Eric Pianka Plague’.

But even this account plays way too much into “external thinking”, placing the threat that motivates and that drives the core, Rockefeller ruling faction’s “eugenic”, ‘humanocidal’ plans as if “outside” the capitalist core, in other nations, in “semi-peripheral” regions, and in “peripheral” regions.

In truth, the threat that drives the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ to ‘humanocide’ resides right in the very heart of the core region of capitalism, and that threat is inherent in the development of capitalism itself.

Capitalism itself, “their” system, is the core threat to its capital-owning ruling class, throughout that system, but most powerfully of all in the legacy region of its geographical origin and core.

Capitalism itself is the core of the mortal threat to the power of the core, legacy capitalist ruling class, and also to all capitalist ruling classes, throughout the globe. It is also the core of the hope of liberation for humanity’s vast-majority non-ruling class.

The ideological, political, policy, and economic reaction to the, for them, madness-inducing discovery of this fact, by the industrial/financial capitalist ruling class itself, after its zenith of “triumph” against the Southern, slave-holding agricultural/latifundial capitalist ruling class in the U.S. Civil War, in the late 1800s, especially during the twenty long years of “The Great Deflation” of ~1870 to ~1890 -- of which you have probably not ever heard even the slightest peep -- was the reaction that led to the historic split and to the internecine war within the capitalist ruling class, between the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ sand the ‘Roosevelt Faction’; it was the reaction that created the ‘descendence phase’ of the global capitalist system, reversing, e.g., the “Hundred Years’ Peace” of its ‘ascendence phase’; that created the “Third World”, that led to two “World Wars” of unprecedented destructiveness, that lead to Nazi and to fascist state-capitalism in general, as well as to Stalinist state-capitalism, and that has led, ultimately, to the paradoxical ‘capitalist anti-capitalism’ and ‘human anti-humanism’ of the present, still ruling, and ever more ‘humanocidal’, ‘Rockefeller Faction’ of the ‘descendence phase’ ruling class.

But, to understand this “mystery”, of the ‘humanocidal’ degeneration of the ‘descendence phase’ ruling faction; to understand, that is, the ‘‘‘psychohistorical’’’, ‘‘‘socio-political-economic law of motion of modern society’’’; to understand how “the capitalist system itself is the core of the mortal threat to the power of the core, legacy capitalist ruling class, and also to all capitalist ruling classes, throughout the globe.” -- to understand the ‘‘‘psychohistorical’’’ “lawfulness” and, hence, the ‘‘‘psychohistorical’’’ predictability, of this degeneration of the ‘descendence phase’ ruling class, involves insights that have remained inaccessible for the majority of Americans, as well as for other national political majorities.

That understanding presupposes insights into the innermost, hidden dynamics and ‘meta-dynamics’ of the global, world-market, capital-centered system of ‘socio-political-economy’, which the deliberately -- by ‘Rockefeller Faction’ policy -- “dumbed-down” education of most Americans ever since their 1960s coup d’état against the ‘Roosevelt Faction’ leaves them ill-prepared to engage.

Engaging that depth of self-understanding of human society, i.e., of ourselves, requires a kind of thinking that goes beyond our perpetual practice of “personal thinking”, of thinking about ourselves and about our family-members and friends as if in abstracted isolation from the rest of society, of humanity, of history, and of the cosmological totality.

Grasping the solution to the mystery of the persistent, multi-generational, growing will of a tiny fraction of humanity to kill off “95%” of the rest of it/us, requires a kind of ‘multi-personal thinking’, or even of ‘omni-personal thinking’ -- identifying humanity as a whole as a natural system, and as a natural unit, with objective as well as subjective reflection upon its global life-activity.

I will not attempt to engage, herein, that level of insight into the deep ‘‘‘socio-political-economic-psychohistorical’’’ dynamics, and ‘meta-dynamics’, of ourselves as global humanity.

I will not even attempt to address the day-to-day economic dynamics of the growth of productivity in the global capitalist economic system once fixed capital plant and equipment becomes the predominant component of total accumulated capital-value.

Instead, I will offer one example that is of such a dramatic nature as -- perhaps -- to induce in you a feeling for the “stakes” that have motivated the abjectly power-addicted plutocrats, the Nero-like, Caligula-like “Doctor Strangeloves” of the ruling, ‘Rockefeller Faction’ of the ‘descendence-phase’ ruling class to plot the vastest mass murder pogrom in all of human history, a mass murder that, if “successful”, will lead to the collapse of the ‘Meta-Darwinian Fitness’ of the human species, and to the extinction of that human species, and of all life on planet Terra.

¿What would happen, to the core of ‘Rockefeller Faction’ power -- to the ‘Global Dictatorship of Petroleum’ -- if, e.g., some rising, new middle-class member; some educated, technically-skilled, garage or basement “tinkerer” -- in the U.S., in China, in India, in Brazil, in Russia, in South Africa -- consummated the Farnsworth/Bussard “Electrostatic Inertial Confinement” [EIC] fusion reactor design [Philo Farnsworth and Robert Bussard having died suddenly, before they could do so, soon after their respective successful “proof-of-concept” tests of their respective EIC fusion reactor designs], e.g., for a ‘near-zero-radioactivating’, beta-particle-[electron]-releasing-only, fuel regime, like the Boron-Helium III fuel regime, and propagated the knowledge of that successful fusion reactor design around the world, before “a little accident” could be arranged for her or for him?

The capital-value of the global petroleum drilling and transporting and refining infrastructure, the value of that vast capital plant and equipment, and of the stocks and bonds premised upon it, and the capital-value of petroleum itself, and of the mineral rights to the landed property from which underground oil pools can be accessed, would plummet uncontrollably.

The perpetual, deepening indebtedness of “non-oil-producing” nations of the world would be on its way to its blessed end. Every nation that has water -- thus that has people able to live within its territory -- for the more standard fusion fuel regimes, would be able to rapidly replace its fossil fuel energy base with a far more powerful, far cheaper, water-fueled fusion energy power base; with an energy base based upon water itself, H2O, a substance far more difficult to monopolize than petroleum -- or uranium.

The economic base of the power of the Rockefeller plutocracy would evaporate almost overnight.

The legacy capitalist ruling class would be overthrown by their “own” system, by the incentives to accelerating scientific, technological, productivity progress that are inherent in any industrial capitalist system, incentives whose unimpeded actualization drives an even secular fall in the general rate of profit/rate of “return” on capital plant and equipment, due to the accelerating technological obsolescence depreciation, consequent scrapping, and write-off against gross profits, of largely unamortized, ever-less-amortized, capital plant and equipment.

After a certain historical point in the accumulation of fixed capital-value, and of its predominance as a component of total capital-value, further growth of the fixed-capital-incarnated productivity -- the “productive force” -- of fixed capital extinguishes more old, obsolescent fixed-capital-value, that must be subtracted from gross profits, than it creates new capital-value, adding to profits. The net result is a secularly falling rate of profit, unless this process is impeded in ways which lead to the recurring, worsening episodic outbreak of profits-collapsing depression-crises.

THE ‘ROCKEFELLER FACTION’ WILL DO ANYTHING -- ANYTHING, NO MATTER HOW VICIOUS, NO MATTER HOW ULTRA-CRIMINAL -- TO STOP ITS OVERTHROW BY THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM ITSELF FROM HAPPENING.

Overall Summary. The [pseudo-]”Ecology” movement is just the Rockefeller Faction’s “Eugenics” movement re-named, re-cloaked, and escalated, from a campaign for multiple, “local” genocides, to a campaign for global -- “95%” -- “humanocide”.

The deep and deepening divide between the “Left” and the “Right” , world wide, and especially in the U.S., is the Rockefeller Faction’s greatest divide-and-conquer asset, and weapon, using us to block each other, keeping us at each others throats, thwarting our efforts to escape the “New/Final Dark Ages” undertow of ‘Rockefeller Faction’ rule.

An old book entitled The German Ideology noted that, in every epoch, the ideas of the ruling class are the ruling ideas. ¿How many among the non-ruling-class articulators of ideas can resist the temptations of the power and the “perks” offered by ruling class concentrated wealth in return for adhering to the ruling class “party line” -- or can withstand ruling class attempts to enforce impoverishment upon those who articulate ideas that the ruling class does not like?

The ideas of the ruling class are the ruling ideas -- except when their reign is nearing its end, and when they are beginning to lose their grip on rule, as well as beginning to lose their grip on sanity. I think that the hyper-murderous “Doctor Strangeloves” of the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ eminently so qualify.

I believe that any further socio-political-economic progress requires a prior re-unification of the electorate. It requires a majority of our polity united in opposing the “humanocidal” plans of the ‘descendence phase’ plutocracy -- of the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ -- and proposing a re-establishment of liberty by means of a progression from a failing political-only democracy, whose checks-and-balances have been subverted by ruling class hyper-concentrated wealth and ‘legalized bribery’ [“lobbying” with “campaign contribution”, etc., graft], to a popular movement for a new, higher system of political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY.

Only by a new “hybrid” of “Left” and “Right”, a dialectical “complex unity” of the best features of traditional ‘conserve-ism’ and ‘progress-ism’, can we gain “escape-velocity” from out of our present, ruling-class psycho-engineered “divide-and-conquer” pit, up into a restoration of democracy, of popular sovereignty, of actually-working checks and balances, and of human rights adherence, with nobody “above the law”.

In a sense, such a movement is a conservative movement, aimed at restoring and then sustaining representative democracy, constitutional rule of law, and civil liberties/human rights.

But, in the other sense of its dual sense, it must also be a movement for sustained progress, beyond even the last, highest peak of liberty and of democracy achieved during the best days of the ‘ascendence phase’ of our present social system.

Thus, I am not proposing any one-sided resurrection of the “Old” Left, to counter and overcome the prevailing ‘Rockefeller [pseudo-]Left’ whose ‘whore-ific’ genesis Robert Zubrin so clearly characterized above.

I believe that the only way forward for us is by way of a dialectical synthesis of “Right” and “Left”, beyond the ruling-class divided and ruling-class conquered state of our polity at present.

Achieving such a synthesis will not be easy. Such a synthesis, in its first emergence, will be opposed by both the “Left” and the “Right”. It will succeed only if it gradually grows so as to attract more and more new adherents, formerly of the “Right”, and formerly of the “Left” alike, until it achieves majority.

Below I have linked you to a video-recorded dialogue in which was presented a system of ideas toward achieving a higher form of democracy, which we call the ‘equitarian system’. I have also, below, linked you to a slide deck which presents this ‘equitarian’ system in more systematic detail.

Perhaps you can improve upon these ideas, and/or other ideas of your own discovery, toward a positive way out of our present and on-going ‘descendence-phase ruling class’ peril, that of their planned ‘final solution to the humanity problem’ -- e.g., the ‘Eric Pianka Plague’.

Somebody better, or we are -- or “95%” of each of us is -- quite literally, “toast” -- to be roasted alive in a global ‘second holocaust’ far more destructive and devastating than was even the Rockefeller/Nazi ‘first holocaust’.

http://www.creativecoherence.org/2019/08/08/equitism-summary-presentation-video/

http://www.creativecoherence.org/2019/09/24/equitism-slide-presentation/

The entire human race is at risk of extinction from the Rockefeller Faction’s “final solution”. If they succeed in killing off “95%” of us, they will, in fact, succeed in killing off all of us -- themselves included.

I have linked you also, below, to a bravely if somewhat naively narrated ruling class document, a -- NASA! -- plans presentation document, explicating the Rockefeller Faction’s vision for their ‘final solution to the humanity problem’ --

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5vLuGPV-lU

The late Julian Simon outraged the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ plutocracy in the 1980s and 1990s by systematically and scientifically debunking their lies, and their hired liars, in the areas of population growth, economic growth, technological progress, and ‘econo-ecological’ well-being, possibly at the cost of his own life.

He documented, in the final section of his book Population Matters, and for only the years 1979 to 1981, the massive, multi-million dollar payola of the major ‘ideology-engineering’ institutions of the ruling, ‘Rockefeller Faction’ oil/banking plutocracy -- i.e., of the global ‘Dictatorship of Petroleum’ -- which that ‘conspiracy of the privileged’ expended in order to shape and control their ‘Earthist’ anti-humanity movement, turning many once grass-roots anti-pollution movement organizations into their wholly-“owned” ‘whoreganizations’ --

Evidence: Some “Foundation” Grants to “Environmental” Organizations, 1979-1981

Grand Total: $23,187,111
Funding from Rockefeller Institutions: $9,201,810
Funding from Two Other Institutions of the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ Plutocracy: $13,985,301

Recipient of Funding	Amount Received (1979-1981)	Funding Provider
Population Council	$3,650,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Population Council	$3,015,000	Rockefeller Foundation
Aspen Institute	$313,000	Rockefeller Foundation
National Resources Defense Council	$210,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Population Resource Center	$200,000	Rockefeller Foundation
National Center for Policy Institute	$140,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Environmental Policy Institute	$130,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Northern Rockies Action Group	$120,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
New Alchemy Institute	$120,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Conservation Law Foundation of New England	$120,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Center for Law and Social Policy	$115,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Sierra Fund Legal Defense Fund	$110,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis [Club of Rome]	$108,000	Rockefeller Foundation
Wilderness Society	$60,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis [Club of Rome]	$60,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Aspen Institute	$60,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Environmental Defense Fund	$55,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Zen Center [San Francisco]	$50,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Natural Resources Defense Council	$50,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
National Audubon Society	$50,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Conservation Foundation	$50,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Citizens for a Better Environment	$40,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Zero Population Growth Foundation	$37,500	Rockefeller Foundation
World Watch Institute	$35,000	Rockefeller Foundation
Lindesfarne Association	$35,000	Rockefeller Foundation
Massachusetts Audubon Society	$34,000	Rockefeller Foundation
Survival International	$25,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Natural Resources Defense Council	$25,000	Rockefeller Foundation
Community Nutrition Institute	$25,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)	$25,000	Rockefeller Brothers Fund
John Muir Institute	$24,310	Rockefeller Foundation
World Wildlife Fund	$20,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
National Wildlife Foundation	$20,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Environmental Action Foundation	$20,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Southwest Research and Information Center	$15,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Conservation Institute	$15,000	Rockefeller Foundation
Public Land Institute	$10,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Environmental Law Institute	$10,000	Rockefeller Family Fund
Population Council	$7,408,000	Ford Foundation
Natural Resources Defense Council	$1,740,000	Ford Foundation
Alaskan Native Foundation	$1,436,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
Alan Guttmacher Institute	$1,000,000	Ford Foundation
Native American Rights Fund	$600,000	Ford Foundation
Environmental Defense Fund	$404,000	Ford Foundation
New England Natural Resources Center	$335,500	Ford Foundation
Wisconsin Center for Public Policy	$268,000	Ford Foundation
Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund	$170,000	Ford Foundation
Washington University Center for Biology of Natural Systems	$79,443	Ford Foundation
Consumer Energy Foundation of America	$76,546	Ford Foundation
American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)	$75.417	Ford Foundation
Survival International	$60.000	Ford Foundation
Center for Law and Social Policy	$50,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
Conservation Foundation	$30,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
Aspen Institute	$29,395	Ford Foundation
Conservation Foundation	$25,000	Ford Foundation
Hawaiian Coalition for Native Claims	$25,000	Ford Foundation
World Wildlife Fund	$25,000	Ford Foundation
Alaskan Native Foundation	$20,000	Ford Foundation
Aspen Institute	$20,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
New York Lawyers for the Public Interest	$16,000	Ford Foundation
Alan Guttmacher Institute	$15,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
Environmental Defense Fund	$15,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
Center for Law and Social Policy	$12,000	Ford Foundation
American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)	$10,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
Hawaiian Coalition for Native Claims	$10,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
Massachusetts Audubon Society	$10,000	Ford Foundation
Youth Project	$10,000	Ford Foundation
Consumer Energy Foundation of America	$5,000	Atlantic Richfield Foundation
Institute for Democratic Socialism	$5,000	Ford Foundation

Source: Julian Simon, Population Matters: People, Resources, Environment & Immigration, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, 1993, pp. 513-515.

For more about this, see also --

http://global-samizdat.org/Global-Samizdat/GS12-WhoFundsEcologism/GS12-WhoFundsEcologism.htm

I thought that it might be helpful in conclusion -- one image being “worth a thousand words” -- if I summed-up, for you, the overall warning and import of these “DOTS” in a single ‘anti-logo’, which I call ‘the humanity mowers’, and, for reasons that should, by now, via the foregoing “DOTS”, and also by this very image itself, be obvious to you, ‘The Rocke-Nazis’ --

For more information regarding these Marxian and Seldonian insights, please see:

www.dialectics.info

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH?ref=search_shop_redirect