Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: Draft Amendment: Dialectical Synthesis – “Right to Life” versus “Right to Choose”.

Tuesday, August 02, 2022

Draft Amendment: Dialectical Synthesis – “Right to Life” versus “Right to Choose”.

‘Draft Amendment: Dialectical Synthesis –

“Right to Life” versus “Right to Choose”.

Use Dialectics to Defeat the “Life” vs. “Choice”

Divide-and-Conquer “Antinomy”.

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

Dear Reader,

The ruling, ‘Rocke-Nazi’, ‘human anti-humanist’, exterminationist faction of the capitalist ruling class has set the majority class at each others’ throats, dividing us, and conquering us, for far too long already -- distracting us from noticing them, “behind the curtains”, striving to arrange for their planned, Malthusian, “People Are Pollution”, “Global Warming” ideologies-based extermination of “95%” of us.

[For background on this ruling faction, and their ultra-criminal plans, see, for example –

Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: Plutocracy Publicly Proclaims Planned Planetary Population Plummeting. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES. (capitalismsfundamentalflaw-wayforward.blogspot.com)].

The JPG texts, posted below, presents a first draft of our proposed ‘Reproduction Rights’ Article of Amendment to the U. S. Constitution.

The “Right to Live” versus “Right to Choose” controversy is not only driven by the ‘ideology-engineering’ and ‘divide-and-conquer engineering’ of the ‘Rocke-Nazis’.

It is so effective as a ‘divide-and-conquer’ tool for them, precisely because there is a genuine dialectical contradiction – an apparent ‘Kantianoid’ “antinomy” – within the advanced conception of human rights that humanity has rather recently achieved.

The people have an obligation to protect the “right to live” of Citizens, e.g., against the crime of murder, that extends to protecting the life of a yet-to-be born but gestating human being and ‘proto-Citizen’. They must therefore criminalize abortion, the crime of a mother killing her unborn baby, as a form of murder.

The mother of that unborn child has the sovereign right to the disposition of her own body, and thus of its parts, and that fetus, during its gestation, is part of her body, and nourished by her body. She should therefore have the right to dispose of her unborn child in any way she chooses, with no interference from the state.

The draft constitutional amendment, posted below, locates a ‘complex unity’ of the above-stated opposing, mutually-contradictory propositions, and proposes, on that basis, a dialectical synthesis of the two antithetical propositions and positions, as a constitutional amendment, one that involves, and must involve, constitutional principles that would be inadmissible except in the context of this “antinomy”.

We urge you to consider this draft amendment, to improve upon it, and to campaign for its constitutional adoption as so improved, so that the majority class can stop warring within itself, especially over this “life” vs. “choice” division, and can turn our attention instead to defeating the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ exterminationist pogrom, e.g., by non-violently and constitutionally establishing ‘equitist political-economic democracy’.

For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see --

www.dialectics.info .

For F.E.D. books, and for partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see: