UPDATE:
‘CITIZEN
PRIVACY RIGHTS’— Proposed Amendment 29
to
the
U. S. Constitution. –
STOP the Incipient ‘Rocke-Nazi’ Dictatorship!
GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.
Dear Reader,
The ruling, ‘Rocke-Nazi’, ‘human anti-humanist’, exterminationist faction
of the capitalist ruling class has set up the digital infrastructure for a totalitarian
police state in the United States.
As revealed by courageous
individuals like Edward Snowden, at great risk to themselves, the ‘Rocke-Nazi’-owned U. S. Government has now, for many years, been recording
your every phone-call, text message, email message, credit card transaction, debit
card transaction, bank transactions-in-general, and your library books and CDs
borrowings, the image of car license plate while you drive, the image of your
face when you are out in public, etc., etc., and has developed Orwellian
police-state technologies for the audio and video stealth surveillance of you
and your family in your home, e.g., via your large-screen TV, and for the stealth
surveillance of every key stroke you make on your home computer, etc., etc.
[For background
on this ruling faction,
and their ultra-criminal plans, see, for example –
The JPG text, posted below, presents a second draft of our
proposed ‘Citizen Privacy Rights’ Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, proposed
as Article of Amendment # 29.
COMMENTARY on Draft Right to Privacy Amendment to the U. S. Constitution.
•
A robust right to privacy, while abundantly justified
on general ethical, moral, and human rights grounds, will also be necessary if
citizens are to mount a campaign to reverse the slide into Orwellian
police-state totalitarianism that is increasingly evident in the U.S. [as well
as worldwide], by means of attaining the higher civilizational level of Political-ECONOMIC
DEMOCRACY.
•
This amendment instantiates the concept of a Political-ECONOMIC
Constitution, because it recognizes that the threat to liberty
comes, today, not only from government, but, and even more so, from both
private and “public” corporations that have in so many ways outgrown and
dwarfed governments; economic organizations that have even managed to “buy out”
governments, via lobbying and other forms of legalized bribery, obviating
political-only checks-and-balances. Thus, this amendment does not address only
checks on government infringements of liberty, leaving constraints on, e.g.,
infringements of liberty by economic entities to statute law. This amendment addresses threats to liberty
by both “political” and “economic” organizational entities.
•
Many U.S. Citizens today dismiss concern over the
mounting hyper-surveillance of their lives -- of every phone call, of every
credit/debit card purchase, of every email, not to mention the growing presence
of [e.g., “facial recognition”] digital video cameras and audio recorders in
public space and even in private homes via new consumer electronics devices --
saying “I don’t care what they know about me; I have nothing to hide”. Those citizens underestimate the potential of
governmental and of private organizations to gather “dirt” on them, that, if
disclosed, could destroy their jobs, their family relationships, and/or their
friendships, and that can thus be used to “blackmail” them to commit acts on
behalf of governmental, or of private, organizations that they would not
otherwise condone or commit. This
amendment would also inhibit the “character assassination” and “cancellation”
of non-consenting private individuals by the
corporate media.
This amendment will
be bad news for government spies, for mail, e-mail, and cold call telephone
marketers, spammers, and fraudsters, for blackmailers, for private detective
agencies, for tabloid scandal-sheets, for paparazzi, for credit bureaus, and
for others who have, for decades, heaped increasing abuse upon the public --
upon defenseless individuals. It is bad
news also for marketers who inundate individual citizens with “targeted” and
“tailored” ads -- “tailored” through detailed covert surveillance data on
individual citizens. The media, per this
amendment, may still legally report on organizational conduct, on the public
activities of public officials, of public policy advocates, and of corporate
officers, but not on their private and personal lives, and
not on unindicted and non-consenting
individuals within those organizations.
This amendment does not outlaw personal data
collection and retention regarding private citizens. However, entities wishing to lawfully collect
and/or retain such information must have the detailed, acceptably-compensated,
and time-limited consent of the individuals to whom that personal information
pertains, in writing, prior to the commencement of any
collection and/or retention of such information. Collection of information on persons with
U.S. Presence who are not U.S. Citizens is not
restricted by this amendment.
For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see --
For F.E.D. books, and for partially pictographical,
‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’
-- see:
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];
Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
No comments:
Post a Comment