The First Two Species of Dialectic -- Brief
Characterizations, Part 07: ‘Seldon’s Soliloquies Series’.
Dear Reader,
It
is my pleasure,
and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia
Dialectica [F.E.D.]
Office of Public Liaison, and
as a voting member of F.E.D.,
to share, with
you, from
time to time, as
they
are approved
for public release by
the F.E.D.
General Council, key
excerpts
from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder,
Karl Seldon.
The seventh such release in this new series is posted below [Some E.D.
standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of
the Special Council for the Encyclopedia,
to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].
In this 7th installment, Seldon briefly characterizes the first two
species in the ‘ordinality’ of dialectics -- in both the systematic and the historical speciation of dialectics, i.e., in both ‘the SYSTEMATIC dialectic of the dialectic itself’, and ‘the HISTORICAL dialectic of the dialectic itself’.
Seldon --
“ ‘‘‘Systematic
Dialectic’’’ is ‘[Ideo-]Systematic Ideo[-Physio]-Taxonomy’.”
“ ‘‘‘Historical Dialectic’’’ is ‘[Ideo-[Physio-]]
Ontological Chrono-Taxonomy’.”
“The essence of ‘‘‘Systematic Dialectic’’’ is present [nearly-synchronic]
«aufheben» RELATION, resulting from past [extendedly-diachronic]
«aufheben» PROCESS.”
“The essence of ‘‘‘Historical Dialectic’’’ is the [extendedly-diachronic] «aufheben» PROCESS -- «aufheben» ‘meta-dynamicity’
[typically via processes
of «aufheben» ‘meta-«monad»-ization’].”
For more
information regarding these
Seldonian insights, please see --
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel
Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia
Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D.
Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D.
Office of Public Liaison.
No comments:
Post a Comment