‘EQUITARIAN’ PROPERTY-FORMS -- Forms /Species of Property Rights Recognized or Established per the
Proposed ‘‘‘Equitist’’’ Constitutional Amendment and ‘Amendatory Annex’.
Dear Reader,
The
proposed ‘Equitarian Constitution’ -- i.e., the proposed amendments-based,
rule-of-law-based, ‘Equitarian’,
conversion of the U.S. Constitution, from one attempting to establish political-ONLY, “representative” democracy,
to one establishing grass roots ‘political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’
-- involves the constitutional recognition, or the first-time establishment
in constitutional law, of six species of Property-Relations.
For
background on ‘‘‘Equitism’’’ as the envisioned higher successor socio-political-economic
system to the capitalist system, please see --
The
three forms of property that are «aufheben»-continued and -preserved -- and
-elevated -- in the ‘Equitarian
Constitution’, and in the
higher socio-political-economic system that this ‘‘‘supreme law of the land’’’
constitution is intended to inaugurate within the rule of law of the United
States of America, are those of (1) ‘‘‘Personal Property’’’, (2) ‘‘‘Private Property’’’, and (3) ‘‘‘State/Public Property’’’.
The
three additional forms of property that are unprecedented within, and
that would be established in U.S. law for the first time per, the
adoption of the ‘Equitarian
Constitution’, are those of (4) ‘‘‘Collective Property’’’, (5) ‘‘‘Social Property’’’ [cf. Marx, Capital III, NW, p. 437.], and (6) ‘‘‘Individual Property’’’ [cf. Marx, Capital I, NW, p.
763.].
Note
that this development -- both conditionally predicted by us for the future
of humanity, and proposed by us in the present
-- instantiates the [‘contra-Boolean’] NQ algebraic logic’s ‘fundamental
equation of dialectical logic’.
E.g.,
given that we take C to denote,
collectively, the three «aufheben»-preserved Capitalist[~ and pre-capitalist]
Property-Forms, and E to denote the three qualitatively new, qualitatively
different, and ‘socio-ontologically’ unprecedented Equitarian Property-Forms, we can map
this categorial, and predicted-historical, progression as --
C --> C(C) = C2 = C + Delta(C) |-= C + E.
--
wherein ‘C(C) = ~C = C
of C = C2’
connotes our ‘pre-constructed’ future “practical-critical”, «aufheben» self-critique, of the practitioners
of the ‘capital-praxis’, by
the practitioners of the ‘capital-praxis’.
The
six forms of property-relations/-rights
inhering in C2, per this solution for C2, are enumerated and elaborated one-by-one below.
1. ‘‘‘Personal Property’’’ -- This is the form
of property involved when a citizen purchases a commodity using
personally-owned revenues, e.g., wages, so that
this commodity thereby drops out of “the sphere of circulation”, and into “the
sphere of [personal] consumption”. Per
the ‘Equitarian Constitution’, each citizen’s ‘Citizen Birthright Equity’ Social Trust
Fund is the potential
‘‘‘Personal Property’’’ of that Citizen, awaiting statutorily-supported
conversion from ‘‘‘Social Property’’’
into ‘‘‘Personal Property’’’.
2. ‘‘‘Private Property’’’ -- E.g., the legal nature
of the ownership, by profit-seeking, ‘‘‘Capital-Equity’’’ firms,
e.g., corporations, of their means of production, as
capital-property. This form of property
is NOT outlawed
under the ‘Equitarian Constitution’, but may decline in
frequency and ‘social density’ via its competitions with the ‘‘‘Collective Property’’’, ‘‘‘Social Property’’’, and ‘‘‘Individual Property’’’ provisions,
in practice, of that Constitution.
3. ‘‘‘State/Public Property’’’ -- Continues to
exist per the ‘Equitarian
Constitution’. In the form of ‘‘‘State Capital’’’ -- e.g.,
of ‘‘‘State Property’’’ in means of production, etc., it is
tolerated, under its ‘‘‘Amendatory Annex’’’, only
where market competition regarding the output of those means
of production fails, until or unless such market competition can be restored, e.g., via new, competing ‘Capital Equity’ enterprises, and/or new, competing ‘Citizen Stewardship Equity’ enterprises.
4. ‘‘‘Collective Property’’’ -- Per the ‘Equitarian Constitution’, this form of property is epitomized by the ‘Citizen Externality Equity’
property-right and human-right. The latter is the right of citizens
suffering pollution, etc., externalities, i.e., “external costs”, at the hands
of private capitalist enterprises, and/or of ‘state-capitalist enterprises’, and/or of ‘Citizen
Stewardship Equity’ enterprises, to vote in elections
that maintain grass-roots, democratically-managed,
electorally-managed, internalized
economic checks-and-balances
against the uncontrolled
production of externalities
by such enterprises, e.g., via this ‘‘‘Collective Property’’’ application of
“Coase’s Theorem”.
5. ‘‘‘Social Property’’’ [cf. Marx, Capital III, NW,
p. 437.] -- Per the ‘Equitarian Constitution’, this form of property is epitomized by the ‘Citizen Stewardship Equity’
property-right and human-right. This
involves the right of a constitutionally and statutorily certified, and ‘Social
Bank’-backed collective
of Citizens to constitute a ‘Stewardship
Equity’ socialized producers’ cooperative enterprise, competing, in product(s)/service(s)
market(s) per its ‘Social Bank’-endorsed Business Plan,
with other ‘Stewardship Enterprises’,
and/or with remaining Capital-Equity enterprises, including state-capitalist enterprises,
and holding both the stewardship and the usufruct of the means of
production provided to it, under various covenants, as a kind of ‘Public
Venture Capital’, by a competing, OCSP-chartered ‘Citizen
Stewardship Equity Social Bank, also a Stewardship Equity cooperative enterprise’, but not holding those means
of production as ‘‘‘Personal’’’,
or as ‘‘‘Private’’’, or even
as ‘‘‘Individual’’’ Property. Those means of production
remain ‘‘‘Social Property’’’,
for the usufruct of which a monthly ‘Social
Rent’ is due to the electoral national Office of the Custodian of Social
Property [OCSP]. The purposes
of these ‘Social Rents’
include ‘incentivizing’ economy in the use of means of
production, funding the expanding plant and equipment requirements of successful old, and net new, Stewardship cooperatives, funding replacement of obsolescent means of
production plant and equipment, for enterprises choosing
subscription to OCSP ‘techno-depreciation insurance’, and service as one of the
funding sources for, e.g., the ‘Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds’.
6. ‘‘‘Individual Property’’’ [cf. Marx, Capital I, NW, p.
763.] -- Per the ‘Equitarian Constitution’, this form of property is epitomized by the
individual ownership aspect of the ‘Citizen
Stewardship Equity’ property-right and human-right, as it
pertains to each individual Citizen member of a ‘Stewardship cooperative collective’. No
individual member of a ‘Stewardship
cooperative collective’ holds any ‘‘‘Personal Property’’’ claim to the means
of production provided to that ‘Stewardship
enterprise’, via its ‘Social Bank’ partner, to meet the
requirements of its ‘Social Bank’-endorsed Business Plan. But each
individual Citizen-member of each
‘Citizen Stewardship Equity socialized producers’ cooperative’, owns an inalienable [‘non-sale-able’] ‘‘‘Individual Property’’’ right in the ‘Stewardship collective’ that
collectively holds that cooperative’s means of production usufruct,
its ‘Social Bank’ endorsement, and its ‘Social Bank’ covenants,
granted in return for that ‘Social Bank’ endorsement. That ‘Individual
Property’ right grants, to each such Citizen-member, an equal share in the monthly net operating surplus of that
enterprise, compensation for hours worked for that enterprise, at (a) rate(s)
commensurate per the relevant ‘Skills Market(s)’, and an equal vote in the election and/or
recall of managers, as in all other key management decisions
of that cooperative enterprise. This ‘Individual Property’ right of each such
Citizen cannot be altered without due process of law, beginning with adversarial
court proceeding(s) in the ‘Citizen
Stewardship Equity’ Tribunal of proximate jurisdiction, and
subject to ultimate appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.
We
hold that a ‘Property-Forms’, juridical analysis of the proposed
‘socio-political-economic system’ of ‘‘‘Equitism’’’, such as that outlined
above, provides useful insights into the envisioned ‘inner
inter-workings’ of that proposed successor system to the present,
capital-relation-dominated, ‘socio-political-economic system’.
For more
information regarding these
Seldonian insights, please see --
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel
Detonacciones
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia
Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of
Public Liaison.
SOLUTION –
‘Equitist
Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’;
BOOK:
MARX’S MISSING
BLUEPRINTS
Free of Charge Download
of Book PDF --
http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html
Hardcover Book Order --
http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html
No comments:
Post a Comment