Tuesday, August 02, 2022

The “Reform versus Revolution Antinomy” – Dialectical Synthesis Solution.

 

The “Reform versus Revolution Antinomy

Dialectical Synthesis Solution.

 

 GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOHESES.


 

Dear Reader,

 

The ‘dialectogram’ JPG image, posted below, describes a predicted dialectical synthesis solution to the “social revolution versus social reform” supposed ‘Kantianoid’ antinomy that Marx also envisioned, as evidenced by the three quotes from Marx’s [and, in one case, also from Engels’s] writings and speeches that are included in that ‘dialectogram’.

 

“Social Revolution” does not necessarily require barricades and blood in the streets.  “Social Revolution”, in its Marxian meaning, does not necessarily exclude lawful, non-violent means, if the resulting reforms institute changes of sufficient depth.  “Social Revolution”, in its Marxian meaning, applies to any movement for societal change that accomplishes a change in the prevailing ‘“social relations of [societal self-re-]production”’ of a given human society – e.g., to an «aufheben» of the capital/wage-labor relation [Marx], yielding a new, higher “social relation of production” -- notwithstanding if that change in fundamental social relations is achieved without criminal violence, and in accord with the rule of law, by means of majoritarian, democratic, legislative and constitutional amendment enactments.

 

 

Pseudo-Marxian “Marxists – e.g., Leninists, Trotskyists, Stalinists, and Maoists – want you to think that social revolution and social reform constitute an [undialectical] radical diremption because, without mass violence, and a consequent breakdown of the rule of law, their little putschist parties cannot hope to launch their coup d’├ętat, imposing their one-party police-state dictatorship OVER the proletariat, i.e., upon the majority class, and thereby winning for themselves all of the perverted perks of power that they wet-dream about every night.

 

The capitalist ruling class ruling faction will, of course, attempt to suppress such social change with police and military criminal violence, but, as was shown by the circa 1989 revolutions that overthrew Stalinist, pure-state-bureaucratic-ruling-class state-capitalism in East Germany, Russia and Eastern Europe, sufficiently majoritarian popular support for such a social revolution can stay the hand of police and army, and enable an overthrow of the old ruling class – as it did with the Stalinist national ruling classes there -- with amazingly little public violence.  Of course, the unstayed hand of the Western, ‘Rocke-Nazi’ ruling class ruling faction soon imposed a profound Mafia and social shock treatment collective punishment on the Russian people, and on the peoples of Eastern Europe, which did later lead to counter-revolutionary social violence.

 

Quotations from Marxian writings and speeches that demonstrate Marx’s [and Engels’s] distance from the “MarxIST pseudo-Marxians include the following –


When Marx and Engels participated, personally and signally, in the European continent-wide revolutionary uprisings of 1848, Europe was ruled largely by violently-repressive monarchical police states.  Marx and Engels thus saw no way forward for humanity’s evolution other than by way of violent revolution.  But the progress of capitalist representative democracy during Marx’s lifetime led him later to revise his views regarding the necessity of violent revolution for the supercession of capitalism --

 

Someday the worker must seize political power in order to build up the new organization of labor; he must overthrow the old politics which sustain the old institutions, if he is not to lose Heaven on Earth, like the old Christians who neglected and despised politics.  But we have not asserted that the ways to achieve that goal are everywhere the same.”

 

“You know that the institutions, mores, and traditions of various countries must be taken into consideration, and we do not deny that there are countries -- such as America, England, and if I were more familiar with your institutions, I would perhaps also add Holland -- where the workers can attain their goal by peaceful means. [Marx, 8 Sep. 1872, Amsterdam, Address after the Fifth Congress of the International Working Men’s Association [“First International”]].

 

The key to the “institutions, mores, and traditions” that make possible a relatively peaceful transition to what we name ‘political-economic democracy is, according to Marx, the advancement of capitalist representative democracy to the point of universal suffrage -- to the right of the “propertyless” working-class majority to vote in national & local elections:

...the first step in the revolution by the working class, is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class, to win the battle of democracy.[Marx and Engels, 1848, The Communist Manifesto];But universal suffrage is the equivalent of political power for the working class of England, where the proletariat forms the large majority of the population, where, in a long though underground civil war, it has gained a clear consciousness of its position as a class, and where even the rural districts know no longer any peasants, but only landlords, industrial capitalists (farmers) and hired labourers.  The carrying of universal suffrage in England would therefore be a far more socialistic measure than anything which has been honoured with that name on the continent.  Its inevitable result, here, is political supremacy of the working class.

[Marx, 1852, commenting on the Chartist movement].  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see -- www.dialectics.info .

 

 

 

 

 

For F.E.D. books, and for  partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Draft Amendment: Dialectical Synthesis – “Right to Life” versus “Right to Choose”.

 

Draft Amendment: Dialectical Synthesis

“Right to Life” versus “Right to Choose”.

 

Use Dialectics to Defeat the “Life” vs. “Choice”

Divide-and-Conquer Antinomy.


GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The ruling, ‘Rocke-Nazi’, ‘human anti-humanist’, exterminationist faction of the capitalist ruling class has set the majority class at each others’ throats, dividing us, and conquering us, for far too long already -- distracting us from noticing them, “behind the curtains”, striving to arrange for their planned, Malthusian, “People Are Pollution”, “Global Warming” ideologies-based extermination of “95%” of us.

 

[For background on this ruling faction, and their ultra-criminal plans, see, for example –

 

Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: Plutocracy Publicly Proclaims Planned Planetary Population Plummeting. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES. (capitalismsfundamentalflaw-wayforward.blogspot.com)].

 

The JPG texts, posted below, presents a first draft of our proposed ‘Reproduction Rights’ Article of Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. 

 

The “Right to Live” versus “Right to Choose” controversy is not only driven by the ‘ideology-engineering’ and ‘divide-and-conquer engineering’ of the ‘Rocke-Nazis’.

 

It is so effective as a ‘divide-and-conquer’ tool for them, precisely because there is a genuine dialectical contradiction – an apparent ‘Kantianoid’ antinomy – within the advanced conception of human rights that humanity has rather recently achieved.

 

The people have an obligation to protect the “right to live” of Citizens, e.g., against the crime of murder, that extends to protecting the life of a yet-to-be born but gestating human being and ‘proto-Citizen’.  They must therefore criminalize abortion, the crime of a mother killing her unborn baby, as a form of murder.

 

The mother of that unborn child has the sovereign right to the disposition of her own body, and thus of its parts, and that fetus, during its gestation, is part of her body, and nourished by her body.  She should therefore have the right to dispose of her unborn child in any way she chooses, with no interference from the state.

 

The draft constitutional amendment, posted below, locates a ‘complex unity’ of the above-stated opposing, mutually-contradictory propositions, and proposes, on that basis, a dialectical synthesis of the two antithetical propositions and positions, as a constitutional amendment, one that involves, and must involve, constitutional principles that would be inadmissible except in the context of this antinomy.

 

We urge you to consider this draft amendment, to improve upon it, and to campaign for its constitutional adoption as so improved, so that the majority class can stop warring within itself, especially over this “life” vs. “choice” division, and can turn our attention instead to defeating the ‘Rocke-Naziexterminationist pogrom, e.g., by non-violently and constitutionally establishing equitist political-economic democracy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see -- www.dialectics.info .

 

 

 

 

 

For F.E.D. books, and for  partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, July 30, 2022

‘Workers’ Capitalism’ – Marx’s Model in Capital III.

 

‘Workers’ Capitalism’ – Marx’s Model in Capital III.

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The ‘dialectogram’ pasted-in below represents our visualization of a key but little-mentioned component in Marx’s systematic dialectic of the capitalist system, set forth by Marx in a passage on page 440 of the 1967 New World paperback edition of Marx’s Capital, volume III, in its Chapter XXVIII, entitled “The Role of Credit in Capitalist Production”.

 

 

This passage states as follows –

 

The co-operative factories of the labourers themselves represent within the old form the first sprouts of the new, although they naturally reproduce, and must reproduce, everywhere in their actual organization all the shortcomings of the prevailing system.  But the antithesis between capital and labour is overcome within them, if at first only by way of making the associated labourers their own capitalist, i.e., by enabling them to use the means of production for the employment of their own labour.”

“They show how a new mode of production naturally grows out of an old one, when the development of the material forces of production and of the corresponding forms of social production have reached a particular stage. …

 

The view of producers’ cooperatives stated by Marx above is set for ‘institution-ization’ per that aspect of the draft statutes and constitutional amendments that we are proposing for the non-violent, rule-of-law-based, electoral ‘revolutionary reform’ -- transitioning [state-]capitalism into ‘equitist political-economic democracy -- that we have termed the newly-recognized human right, and the new “individual property” right, of Citizen Stewardship Equity.

 

 

 

For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see -- www.dialectics.info .

 

 

 

 

 

For F.E.D. books, and for  partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, July 02, 2022

SCOTUS Kicks ‘Rocke-Nazi’ Butt AGAIN!


SCOTUS KicksRocke-NaziButt AGAIN:  Their Global Warming Austerity Pogrom also Quashed by a Supreme Court No Longer Their Whore!

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.


SCOTUS, the Supreme Court Of The United States, has kicked the asses of the ruling, Rocke-Nazi Faction of the U. S. Capitalist ruling class, twice in seven days, and kicked their asses far harder than they’ve been kicked ever since the Rocke-Nazis arranged the murders of the Kennedy brothers, of Martin Luther King, Jr., and of many others associated with their rival, ‘Roosevelt Faction’ of the U. S. capitalist ruling class, in their 1960s coup d'e'tat.

 

First off, during those seven days, SCOTUS ended the U. S. national, so called “constitutional right” to murder millions of babies, that, for decades, “legalized” the Rocke-Nazis biggest Stealth Humanocide, population reduction pogrom, which has helped to achieve the human population decline, now even in the U. S., as well as in Japan, Germany AND CHINA, that Elon Musk has been tweeting about lately – much to the chagrin of the Rocke-Nazi-owned mass media.

 

Then, on the last day of June, 2022, SCOTUS threw a wrench into the Rockefeller-ownedEPA’s plan to use the power of the U. S. Federal Government to force the entire U. S. coal industry into bankruptcy, thereby to kill-off a remaining source of relatively inexpensive electrical energy for the U. S. majority-class – both homeowners and renters alike -- and, thereby also, to escalate/inflate monthly utility bills to previously unheard-of levels, thus forcing many Americans into homelessness, as their first wave in the Rocke-Nazis key, Stealth Humanocide pogrom of Global Warming Austerity.

 

Indications are that the Rocke-Nazis, during the period before the Trump Electoral Revolt/Victory, when it looked like their planned Police-State Dictatorship, with digital surveillance of every citizen’s every act of communication, etc., was all but a “done deal”, were planning, by outlawing relatively inexpensive natural gas, petroleum, and coal electrical power generation – “To Save The Planet” [i.e., to save Rockefeller police-state power] -- allowing only highly-expensive and intermittent so-called “clean” energy, to drive monthly energy utility bills for majority-class Americans to upwards of $2000.00 to $3000.00 dollars per month, thus driving millions of Americans into rapid bankruptcy and homelessness.

 

During this period of preparation for their planned escalation, from covert Stealth Humanocide, on into overt, open Humanocide against the U. S. majority class, and, a little later, against the majority of humanity world wide -- the Rocke-Nazis even caused the U.S. government agencies where they surmised that majority-class citizens, driven into homelessness by the Rocke-Nazis Global Warming Austerity, would hold mass demonstrations of protest -- to purchase hundreds of thousands of rounds of hollow-point [dum dum] bullets, so that the Rocke-Nazi’s secret police could mow down those demonstrators by the tens of thousands!

 

Their next step, given sufficient advancement of their police-state power, and "success" in their planned sufficient crippling of China and Russia, was to use their secret police and armed forces to arrest those millions of homeless Americans, and to place them into “protective custody” in FEMA holding camps, which would rapidly morph into the kind of concentration/extermination camps that the Rockefeller Eugenicists” designed for the Hitler Regime when it was still their Servant-Dictatorship, before its circa 1939 turn into a ‘Franken-Dictatorship’, committed to massacring its former Rockefeller and U. K. Royal masters.

 

But the Trump presidential victory upended their well laid plans, and their media, reflecting their rage, went into overdrive, vilifying Trump for every single thing he did, every minute of every day, for all of the years of his Presidency, and beyond.

 

Now, the Democrat Party Rockefeller Whores on the “Jan. 6 Committee”, that Kangaroo Court exclusively populated by anti-Trump agents of the Rockefeller plutocracy, are seeking to apply Putins methods of dictatorship-disguised-as-democracy in the U.S.

 

One of Putins methods is to jail any electoral rival who shows signs of potential to defeat him at the polls.

 

The “Jan. 6” Kangaroo Court is likewise designed to imprison Trump – on [here it comes] ‘‘‘Trumped-Up’’’ charges – so that he will have no chance to run again for the U. S. Presidency: envisioning another four years of a Trump or Trump-like Presidency is a recurring nightmare for the Rocke-Nazis.

 

But, given the Supreme Court majority that Trump’s Presidential Appointments has cemented, it looks like the Rocke-Nazis may have many SCOTUS-gifted more nightmares to come, even if they do manage to imprison Donald Trump!

 

But who could be more deserving of such nightmares than the Humanocidal Maniacs and Ultra-Sadistic Mass Torturers/Mass Murderers of the Rocke-Nazi Plutocracy?

 

On this, see also --

SCOTUS Deals a Blow to the Unaccountable, Unelected Administrative State | Opinion (msn.com)


 

 

 




For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see -- www.dialectics.info .

 

 

 

 

 

For F.E.D. books, and for  partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.