Monday, November 21, 2016

Establishing Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY: Proposed 'Amendatory Constitutional Annex' to the U.S. Constitution -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.





Establishing Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY:  Proposed 'Amendatory Constitutional Annex' to the U.S. Constitution -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.







Dear Reader,



The Equitist Advocacy group, supported by Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.], has today released their proposed PREAMBLE, and their latest draft of their proposed, constitution-incorporated economic-democratic, economic checks and balances instituting, democratic economic governance statutes, for the amendment of the U. S. Constitution so as to establish a Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY in the United States of America, and so as to reverse the present, and presently-accelerating, descent toward totalitarian, police-state, "Eugenics" ['humanocidal'] dictatorship in said United States of America.

These texts are intended as instruments for the support of a massive, grass roots, democratic populist movement, in the U.S., and world wide, without which no such 'revolutionary reforms' can possibly be implemented.

These texts are designed to help such a real movement to defeat the ruling-class financed and formulated right-wing, [e.g., fascist], fraudulent, pseudo-populist ideologies now being spread rapidly, by that ruling class, in the United States, and in Europe -- successfully, in part, for wont of any detailed alternative -- as that ruling class recoils in fear from the growing signs of popular, anti-Wall-Street, anti-"Billionaire-Class" unrest.

Critiques of the -- now ever-worsening -- status quo are classically confronted with the refrain:  "We'd all like to see the plans".

Our "plans" are "see-able", in detail, below.

We do not see our plans as finished, or final.

No small minority can craft plans adequate to the growing diversity of humanity.

We call upon readers to critique, and to suggest improvements to, the texts below.

We will be only too happy to incorporate any and all improvements into our planned later drafts of these 'amendatory' and 'implementary' documents.

Moreover, readers should feel free to use some or all of this material in their own blogs, publications, organizations, etc., with or without attribution to the Equitist Advocacy group, and/or to Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.], entirely at each reader's own discretion.  

Neither organization asserts any proprietary claim with regard to this content.  All of it is under the standard 'Omni-Copyright' policy of this blog, and of F.E.D. and Equitist Advocacy group sites and publications generally.
  

Summary descriptions of the new human rights -- as also new constitutional rights -- founding these proposed 'equitarian revolutionary reforms' can be found via the following link --




Regards,

Miguel







PREAMBLE, Proposed ‘Amendatory Annex’ to the Constitution of the United States.




PREAMBLE.

We, the People of the United States of America, do hereby duly institute into the law of our land this Economic-Democratic Annex to the Constitution of our nation in order thereby to therein establish Political-Economic Democracy.

We do so in cognizance of humanity’s historical experience as to the fate of political-only democracy, in the grip of a self-degenerating capital-centric socio-economic system, and in cognizance of the mechanism of that self-degeneration, as revealed by humanity’s political-economic science. 

Both confirm that human liberty, and human prosperity, cannot therein even be maintained, let alone advanced, by political-only constitutional and statutory checks and balances among the branches of political governance. 

Our historical experience, leading us to these reforms, can be summarized as follows --

The social system founded upon the capital-relationship ineluctably concentrates an ever-greater share of ownership and control of social assets in an ever-shrinking minority of the population, and in a minority increasingly tending to social selection for sociopathic propensities. 

This inherent trend in the capitals-system increasingly affords to its concentrated ownership class, which represents only an ever-tinier minority of the citizen population, an ever greater possibility of, and an ever greater financial capability for, wholesale prostitution of the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches of political government to the unified command of that class, at all jurisdictional levels -- international, national, regional, state [provincial], county, and municipal alike.  

That concentrated ownership thereby defeats constitutional and statutory, political-only checks and balances among the branches of government at all such territorial, jurisdictional levels.

Moreover, as this capitals-system continues, capital-value accumulates, in the hands of this concentrated ownership class, ever-more preponderantly in the forms of fixed capital assets, and of capital-market securities assets, as well as in the form of long-term bank loan capital assets, based upon long term loans used to purchase vast masses of fixed capital plant and equipment.  

The concentrated ownership class thus perceives an increasing vulnerability of its socio-political power to overthrow by forces inherent in competitive capitalism itself.

That class therefore acts to eliminate its exposure to such overthrow, in ways which threaten the liberty, the progress, the health, the livelihoods, and the very lives of the vast majority of U.S. citizens, as well as those of the vast majority of the rest of humanity; thus in ways increasingly destructive to the majority of living human beings, ways which also threaten the future, the very survival, of the human species globally. 

The capital asset value owned by this concentrated ownership class is increasingly vulnerable to obliteration due to technological obsolescence depreciation, given the continuation of normal competition against older capital assets from the latest, most-advanced, highest-productivity fixed capital. 

For example, that capital asset value is vulnerable to competitive devaluation due to such newly-installed fixed capital, operating in newly-industrializing, initially low-wage nations in the geographical periphery of that class’s “home” nation-states, e.g., the United States, as well as from home grown “upstart”, new-entrant innovators within the heartland of the United States itself. 

This vulnerability drives that concentrated ownership class to defend its capital assets, the very basis of its socio-political-economic power, against such technodepreciation in ways which make it the enemy of human progress and, ultimately, the enemy of any human future whatsoever.

That class uses its concentrated economic power, and its burgeoning “buy-out”, “hostile takeover” of national governments, to increasingly suppress any technological progress whose competition would threaten its assets with such technological obsolescence depreciation in its home market. 

As a consequence of its suppression of deep economic competition, hence of deep economic and technological innovation, this class induces the descendent phase – the “vampire-capitalist”, state-capitalist phase -- of the capitals-system, increasingly reversing and destroying all of the social virtues that the capitals-system once exhibited, in its competitive, ascending phase. 

Abroad, this class imposes a system of brutal militarist dictatorships on the newly-industrializing nations of the geographical periphery of its “home” nation-states, e.g., the United States.

It does this so as to reverse or suppress industrialization there, also taxing the wage and salary incomes of its home producing class to pay for that plutocracy’s global secret police “intelligence”, low-wage/union-outlawing enforcement, prison, torture, assassination, and mass murder infrastructure, and also conscripting, from the potentially-productive youth of its home producing class -- or “volunteering” them, by making sure that producing-class youth have few other options for gainful employment other than “military service” -- “cannon fodder” for its international military “interventions”, designed to maintain its global system of such state-capitalist, low-wages-enforcing, unions-butchering, industrialization-suppressing military/police-state ‘servant-dictatorships’. 

This concentrated ownership class thus dupes people whom it has deliberately impoverished into mass-murdering other people whom it has also deliberately impoverished, so as to make both “sides” desperate enough to be corralled into mass-murdering one another, instead of turning against their common tormentors. 

In that process, this concentrated ownership class imposes, step-by-step, on the majority of its own heartland population, an increasingly totalitarian “national security” spy-state/citizen-assassination-state; an increasingly human-rights outlawing and human rights violating degeneration of constitutional, limited-government, representative democracy. 

This concentrated ownership class, in all of these many ways, moves to block the progress of [‘techno-depreciating’] real productivity growth globally.  

That class diverts and perverts potential increments to global prosperity into socially destructive preparations for wars, contrivance of actual wars, and financial cannibalization of productive assets, to contrive profit from destruction, rather than from production. 

That class propagates profit-via-destruction, e.g., as stealth genocide via the interlock of health-destroying pseudo-foods and pseudo-medicines, under the control of concentrated-ownership “Big Agriculture” and “Big Pharma” mega-corporations, as well as via genomically-engineered ‘designer diseases’, or ‘GMO-diseases’ -- genetic-engineering-exacerbated “natural” pathogens.
 
By all of these acts this concentrated ownership class deepens majority impoverishment, and majority death rates, globally, making the very population size of the increasingly suffering majority of humanity a growing remaining threat to that plutocracy’s rule.  

In the end, this concentrated ownership class faces losing control, failing to suppress the growth of science, of working class skill and education, and of industrial productivity worldwide, sufficiently, in their eyes, to protect their capital asset values.   This class thus feels threatened with imminent overthrow by the ‘techno-depreciating’ consequences, and by the democratic aspirations, of the advanced-fixed-capital employing, skilled and educated, economically-empowered, rising middle-working classes worldwide, including in the nations that it had formerly been able to “underdevelop”, under the heels of its ‘servant-dictators’.

This concentrated ownership class therefore desperately opts for a new, and this time global, holocaust; for catastrophic Malthusian “population reduction” -- for “Eugenics” on a global scale, by contriving false flag “terrorist” operations, in part, as an excuse for suppression of constitutional civil liberties and for “national security state” 'totalitarianization', as well as for the diversion of ever more national productivity-increase potential resources into means of mass destruction, and via contrived civil wars, famines, mass homelessness, unprecedented numbers of refugees worldwide, pandemic ‘designer diseases’, pseudo-“natural” disasters, engineered bankruptcies of national social safety nets, engineered economic collapse and ‘designer depressions’, police-state concentration-extermination camps, and new world war. 

This amendatory annex to the Constitution of the United States of America is instituted to economically as well as politically empower the majority, producing class of the citizens of this nation so that that citizenry is enabled to avert the ‘humanocidal’ fate which otherwise impends.







Proposed EquitarianAmendatory Annexto the Constitution of the United States of America.

Constitution-Incorporated Legislation for Implementation of the Equitist Amendments to U.S. Bill of Rights:

Constitutional Establishment of the Equitarian Reform.



Section 1. [Stockholder Equity Rights and Constraints]  All Enterprises under Joint-Stock ownership, and operating within the sovereign territory of the United States of America, shall be operated in accord with the principles of Capital Equity and of Stockholder Democracy.

Sub-Section 1.a [Stockholder Referenda]  Contributors of money, or of other capital property, for the purchase of shares of the common stock of a Joint-Stock Enterprise, shall have the constitutional right to nominate, elect, and recall/replace Directors to the Board of Directors of that Enterprise, to promulgate and to vote upon owner resolutions, and to vote upon other important matters, including compensation, for Directors, and for Senior Management, and donations of Enterprise funds to political candidates, and/or to political causes, on the basis of one vote per share of common stock owned. All such matters shall be decided by majority vote of the owners of record of the common stock, except for political donations. Motions for the latter shall require at least a three-quarters favorable majority vote of the owners of record to carry. The results of such owner referenda shall be binding upon Enterprise Management, who shall be civilly and criminally liable for violations thereof.

Sub-Section 1.b [Tribunals for Stockholder Equity] Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of federal circuit courts, the Tribunals for Stockholder Equity. The specific function of these Tribunals shall be with regard to Stockholder Equity Rights and Constraints:  to adjudicate actions, brought by one or more Citizens, alleging that the Management, or one or more Directors, of a Joint Stock Enterprise have acted in violation of Stockholder Equity Rights and Constraints.
                 
Sub-Section 1.c [Countervailing Citizen Rights]  Citizens are empowered, by constitutional right, hereby granted, to organize and enact, using their own resources, Boycotts of the products and/or of the services offered for sale by Joint Stock Enterprises that said Citizens deem to have intervened in the Legislative, and/or Judicial, and/or Executive, and/or Economic-Democratic processes of the United States of America as a whole, or in that of any Region, State, County, or Municipality thereof, in a manner or manners that they, in their own individual, and/or collective, judgment, deem to be inimical to the General Welfare.  

Section 2. [Citizen Externality Equity Rights and Constraints]  Citizens who suffer the infliction of External Costs upon themselves, in their places of residence, by a local operating unit of an Enterprise, shall acquire thereby Externality Equity in said Enterprise, as a Collective Property, Social Property constitutional Right.

Sub-Section 2.a [Election and Recall/Replacement of Public Directors]  This Property Right shall be exercised as a voting right in the nomination, annual election, and potential recall/replacement, of Public Directors, to an Enterprise Board of Public Directors, constituted as a Second House of the co-management committee of each such local operating unit. Each local operating unit Public Director nominee, to be nominated, must reside in the geographical area of the Electorate of that unit, and, to be elected, must receive a majority of the votes of the Electorate for that unit. The apportionment of Public Board Electorate geographical areas, and the determination of the number of Citizens of local operating unit Electorates to be represented per Public Director, shall be
re-determined annually by majority vote of the Citizen-elected County legislative body within whose jurisdiction the local operating units reside.  Public Boards shall consist of odd numbers of Public Directors to preclude tie votes.  Each Public Board Director shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 5% or greater of their Electorate, and shall be replaced if a majority of their voting Electorate so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes.

Sub-Section 2.b [Mitigation of External Costs and Optimization of External Benefits] Each co-management committee Second House is hereby constitutionally empowered to co-manage the Externalities Budget of the Annual Operating Plan of its Enterprise local operating unit, in mutual cooperation with the First House of that unit's co-management committee. The Second House shall negotiate with the First House thereof for the mitigation of the External Cost burdens generated by that unit, for the optimization of any External Benefits generated by that unit, and regarding the rate of taxation for the External Cost generation still permitted to that unit. The Negotiating Position(s) of each Public Board shall be framed and modified by that Board by majority vote of its Directors.
  
Sub-Section 2.c [Funding of Public Board Operations] The Permitted-Externalities Taxes shall, in part, fund the special operations of their Public Board regarding the remediation of those specific External Costs. General operations of Public Boards shall be funded by a Potential External Costs Tax, paid by each Enterprise local operating unit, levied to offset the public hazard of Potential External Costs Production created by its existence.  Rates of local operating units Potential External Costs taxation shall be re-determined annually by majority vote of the Citizens-elected County legislative body in which the local operating units reside, along with rules for External Cost taxes assessment and Tax Credit determination for External Benefits generated by said local operating units. Monthly salary compensation of Public Directors from these funds shall be set by the Citizen-elected legislative body of the County in which the Electorates of said Public Directors reside.

Sub-Section 2.d [Externality Identification] Each Citizen member of the local Externalities Electorate of a given Public Board shall have plaintive standing to bring one or more complaints before that Board, alleging External Costs suffered by that Citizen individually, by a part of the Electorate to which that Citizen belongs, or by the entirety of the Electorate to which that Citizen belongs, and alleging that those External Costs are produced by one or more Enterprise local operating unit or units co-governed by that Public Board. Confirmation of said allegations by majority vote of that Public Board shall empower it to Negotiate with the First House of its co-management committee for that local operating unit, for preventive mitigation, or for remedial taxation, or for a combination of both, regarding so-confirmed External Costs Production.

Sub-Section 2.e [Tribunals for Externality Equity] Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of federal circuit courts, the Tribunals for Externality Equity. The specific function of these courts shall be to adjudicate cases where Externality Production and/or Externality Taxation negotiations between the two Houses of the co-management committee of a local operating unit have deadlocked. Such cases may be brought by the First House of that co-management committee, by its Second House, or by both Houses together.

Section 3. [Associations of Public Directors: Powers and Constraints] The Citizen Externality Equity Public Directors of the local operating unit level shall organize Associations of Public Directors at the Municipal, County, State, and Regional levels, one Association per Municipality, County, State, and Region, and one National Association of Public Directors, and may also, given (re-)authorization by majority favorable vote in an annual Public referendum, participate in Continental and Global Associations of Public Directors.

Sub-Section 3.a [Associations of Public Directors: Purpose] All such Associations shall be constituted for the purpose of coordinating Policy, and of expressing the will of their Publics, regarding larger-scale economic geography, and societal morphology, beyond the scale of the Enterprise local operating unit, by means of Policy Resolutions.

Sub-Section 3.b [Associations of Public Directors: Election and Replacement] Each Association Director of each such Association of Public Directors shall be empowered to propose, and to vote upon, proposed Policy Resolutions. Each shall be nominated for election by a Citizen or Citizens residing within the geographical unit of jurisdiction of the Association, and shall be annually elected or re-elected, for up to ten consecutive terms, by majority vote of the combined Public Directors Electorates of the geographical unit represented, on a one Citizen, one vote basis. Each Association Director shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 5% or greater of their Electorate, and replaced if a majority of the Electorate voting so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes. Each Association of Public Directors shall consist of an odd number of Association Directors, to preclude deadlocks due to tie votes.

Sub-Section 3.c [Policy Resolution Compliance] Policy Resolutions adopted by majority vote of Municipal, County, State, Regional, National, Continental, and/or Global Public Directors Associations shall be offered to all included lower-scale Associations of Public Directors, and to all included local operating unit Boards of Public Directors, on a non-binding, advisory basis, with respect to actions in response required of included Associations and Boards of Public Directors.  Compliance or non-compliance with Policy Resolutions of a higher scale of Association, by act of a lower scale of Association, or by act of a local operating unit Public Board of Directors, shall be on a voluntary basis, determined by majority vote of said Association, or Board, of Public Directors.
 
Sub-Section 3.d [Funding of Association Operations] Operating expenses of each Association of Public Directors shall be funded by dues paid by all Public Boards of Directors included in the geographical unit represented by that Association, in an amount re-determined annually by majority vote of all included Public Board Directors.  Monthly salary compensation of the Association Directors of each Association from these funds shall also be set annually by majority vote of all Public Board Directors included in the geographical unit represented by that Association.

Section 4. [Citizen Birthright Equity Rights and Constraints]  Congress shall endow, for every Citizen child born from the date of ratification of this Amendment, a lifetime Social Trust Fund, equal, in initial real value, to all other such individual Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds, sufficient to support, in whole, or, at least, in then-affordable part, as determined, and as re-determined annually, by Congress, the expected lifetime healthcare, education, work-life career, unemployment insurance, home purchase, retirement pension, and other social-baseline life necessities of that Citizen, and such that part of those funds, as allotted by Congress, may be applied, by court order, to pay reparations in the event of one or more criminal convictions of that Citizen.

Sub-Section 4.a [Social Trust Funds:  Abuse/Moral Hazard Mitigation] Each Citizen's disposition rights over the Social Trust Fund assigned to that Citizen shall be constrained so as to militate against its misuse. Congress shall enact statutes governing the disposition of Social Trust Fund assets. The national Electorate shall elect, to four year terms, limited to three consecutive terms, in elections coinciding with Presidential elections, eleven Commissioners to a national Commission for Citizen Birthright Equity, which shall promulgate, by majority vote, rules and regulations for the exercise of Citizen Birthright Equity, and which shall manage a national Social Trust Funds Administration. Said rules and regulations shall be administered by said Social Trust Fund Administration, whose operations shall be funded by Congress. Each Commissioner shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 1% or greater of the national Electorate, and shall be replaced if a majority of the Citizens voting so vote, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes. The Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Fund of each Citizen so endowed shall remain Social Property unless or until its assets pass into the Personal Property of that Citizen through their lawful expenditure. 

Sub-Section 4.b [Social Trust Funds:  Sources of Funding] Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds shall be funded, in part, by a portion of the proceeds of the Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Property Rents, paid for the usufruct of Production Plant and Equipment Social Property held in Stewardship by Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises of all kinds, as well as by general Federal tax revenues, as budgeted annually by majority vote of the Congress.

Sub-Section 4.c [Tribunals for Birthright Equity] Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of federal circuit courts, the Tribunals for Birthright Equity. The specific function of these courts shall be to adjudicate actions brought, by any Citizen, or Citizens-class, disputing a decision or decisions regarding requested disposition of Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Fund assets, by the Social Trust Funds Administration.

Section 5.  [Citizen Stewardship Equity Rights and Constraints]  Each adult Citizen is hereby empowered with a Citizen Stewardship Equity constitutional Right to participate in initiating the formation of, and in the democratic self-governance of, Associations of Producers, in the form of Qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises, whose Boards of Directors, and whose local operating unit co-management committee First Houses (if any), shall be nominated, elected, and potentially recalled and replaced, by majority vote of their Citizen Steward Members, on a one Citizen, one vote basis.

Sub-Section 5.a [Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperatives:  Compensation of Citizen Stewards]  Each Citizen Steward member of such a Qualified Cooperative Enterprise shall have the right to contingent annual compensation in the form of an equal share in the annual net profits (if any) of that Cooperative Enterprise, and also to job-performance-based monthly, semi-monthly, or weekly compensation, per an hourly rate set by the Enterprise Board of Directors, and not necessarily equal in value to that of other Citizen Steward Members who perform under different job categories.

Sub-Section 5.b [Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperatives:  Rules of Democratic Self-Governance] The Board of Directors of each Qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise, and the First Houses of each of its local operating unit co-management committees (if any), shall consist of odd numbers of voting members, to avert tie votes. The electoral base for the Board of Directors shall consist of the totality of the Citizen Steward Members of the Cooperative Enterprise as a whole, and, for the First House of the co-management committee of each local operating unit (if more than one such exists), shall consist of all of the Citizen Steward Members who regularly perform full-time work in that local operating unit. Candidate Board Directors, and candidate co-management committee First House voting members, shall be nominated by the Citizen Stewards forming their respective electoral bases, from among those respective electoral bases. Such voting Members, including the Enterprise General Manager, and the local operating unit General Manager (if any), who shall chair their respective Boards or co-management committees, respectively, shall be elected by said electoral base on a one Citizen Steward Member, one vote basis, by majority vote of the respective electoral base Citizen Steward Members, for each candidate voting Member, to the limit of the number of voting members of the governing body to be so elected. Each elected Board Member, or First House co-management committee voting Member, shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 5% of their electoral base Citizen Steward Members, and replaced if a majority of that electoral base voting so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes. Congress shall, by statute, set forth the detailed rules for Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise democratic Self-Governance.

Sub-Section 5.c [Citizen Allocational Equity Rights Regarding Social Property Assets] The Office shall allocate financial assets Social Property to each Qualified Social Bank Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise in accord with an equal per capita availability of such Social Property financial assets by State, pursuant to the principle of Citizen Allocational Equity. If unequal per capita allocations are permitted by majority vote in a referendum of all voting-qualified Citizens of the United States of America, then such allocations shall be permitted only on a temporary and remedial basis, e.g., for the purpose of the remediation of the social consequences of past allocational inequities. The terminal date of any referendum-stipulated unequal geographical, per capita allocation of Social Property asset-values shall be stipulated in the terms of any such referendum presented to the voters. That terminal date shall be no later than twenty years from the date of the last day of the voting on that referendum. The principle of Citizen Allocational Equity includes the constitutional Right, established hereby, for collectives of Citizens, organized as candidate Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative Enterprises, or as candidate Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Bank Cooperative Enterprises (given that their By-Laws and business launch plans/expansion plans meet Congressional, statutory criteria, and meet Office regulatory criteria) to be granted access to the quantities of Social Property financial assets requisite to launch, or to expand, their operations. Any Citizen collective, which is candidate for Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise formation, shall have standing to bring suit in the Tribunals of Allocational Equity against one or more Social Bank, and/or against the Office of the Custodian of Social Property, if a majority of its Members deem that either or both have violated the constitutional Rights established for it by this Section. The principle of Citizen Allocational Equity also includes prohibition of operation of any Enterprise in any branch of product/service supply as State Property, if any mixture of four or more Citizen Collectives, Qualified for provision of Social Property to operate in that branch by one or more Social Banks, or Joint-Stock Ventures, are extant as potential mutually competing Citizen Stewardship Equity and/or Joint Stock Enterprises.
  
Sub-Section 5.d [Tribunals for Stewardship and Allocational Equity] Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of federal circuit courts, the Tribunals for Stewardship and Allocational Equity. The specific function of these Tribunals with respect to upholding Citizen Stewardship Equity Rights shall be to adjudicate legal actions alleging violation of said Rights by any Actionable Party. The specific function of these Tribunals with respect to upholding Citizen Allocational Equity Rights shall be to adjudicate legal actions brought by one or more Citizens alleging violation of said Rights by one or more Social Banks, and/or by the Office of the Custodian of Social Property.

Sub-Section 5.e [Office of the Custodian of Social Property] Congress shall institute a national, Federal Office of the Custodian of Social Property. The general function of this Office shall be to manage Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Property assets, maintaining and updating, as appropriate, an Office Standard Design for same for each international standard product/service category, and endeavoring to maintain a competitive market, served by multiple Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises and/or Joint Stock Enterprises, in the markets for each such product/service category, as a matter of Constitutional Public Policy. The special function of this Office shall be to procure, via competitively-bid contract, from Qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative suppliers, or, but only in the absence of competing such suppliers, to directly produce, under its own management, and using its own Social Property production assets, Standard Design Plant and Equipment Means of Production assets, for each competing Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative which Qualifies for Stewardship of said assets, and which formally applies to the Office for Provision of such assets.

Sub-Section 5.f [Custodian of Social Property:  Function, Election, Compensation, and Recall] The national Electorate shall elect, to four year terms, limited to three consecutive terms, in elections coinciding with Federal Presidential elections, a national Custodian of Social Property. This elected Officer shall oversee the promulgation of regulations, and the implementation of Congressional statutes, for the exercise of Citizen Stewardship Equity; shall oversee the promulgation of Office Standard Designs for each international standard product/service category, shall oversee the updating of Office Standard Designs for which competitive technological obsolescence, advances in safety features, and/or advances in Social Best Practices otherwise, in this Officer's judgment, or per injunction of a Tribunal for Stewardship and Allocational Equity, calls for their updating, and shall manage all national Social Property assets. The compensation of the Custodian of Social Property shall be budgeted annually by Congress, and shall be maintained in equality with that of the President of the United States. The national Custodian of Social Property shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 1% or greater of the national Electorate, and replaced if a majority of that Electorate voting so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes.

Sub-Section 5.g [Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperatives:  Stewardship of Social Property] Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperatives, lawfully granted usufruct of Means of Production Social Property assets, shall not be construed as collectively or personally owning said assets. Each Stewardship Cooperative Enterprise shall retain its Stewardship Equity Rights of socially-productive disposition of said assets, while remaining in good standing in regard to the statutes of Citizen Stewardship Equity Self-Governance, of Solvency, and of use of such assets, in compliance with their Provider-approved, Board-approved, and local operating units co-management committees approved Annual Operating Plans, and in accord with the statutes of Citizen Externality Equity. Otherwise, Social Property asset Stewardship Qualification may be revoked, by action of the Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise which had been the direct Provider of Social Property assets to the thus disqualifiable Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative.

Sub-Section 5.h [Stewardship Cooperatives:  [Self-]Provision of [Non-]Standard Production Assets] Each Qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative shall have the right to procure Office non-standard Means of Production from the Office, given the endorsement of their Office non-standard Production Plant and Equipment Designs by the Social Bank Stewardship Enterprise which is the direct Provider of the Social Property component of its financing. Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative shall have the right to procure its own Production assets, Office Standard in Design, or of its own, Office non-standard Design, directly, from Provisioners other than the Office, such as from other Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative Enterprises, or from Joint-Stock Enterprises, by means of its own resources, only if approved by the Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise that is the direct Provider of the Social Property component of its financing. Assets so acquired shall be deemed the Collective Property of the Stewards of the Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise so-acquiring, rather than as Social Property, as their Private Property, or as their Personal Property.

Sub-Section 5.i [Stewardship Cooperatives:  Social Rents in Return for Use of Social Property] Each Stewardship Cooperative Enterprise, receiving Provision of Means of Production, Social Property assets, Office Standard, or non-standard, from the Office, shall remit a monthly Social Property Rent to society, in return for the usufruct of the Social Property held in Stewardship by it, proportionate to the value of those Social assets, and paid via the Office. These Social Property Rent revenues shall help to support Social Self-Investment in the form of production of Means of Production Social Property, and in the form of Public Infrastructure Social Property, as well as in the form of the income of Social Bank Cooperative Enterprises, and in the form of the funding of Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds.

Sub-Section 5.j [Gratis Replacement of Insured Cooperatives' Obsolescent Social Property] The Office shall duly Re-Provision Insured Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises who formally apply for this Service, if they hold, in Stewardship, assets no longer of Office-Standard Design. The no longer Office-Standard Plant and Equipment assets shall be replaced with new, Office-Standard such assets, whenever the relevant Office's Standard Designs change, given the return of the previous, now non-standard Provision to the custody of the Office by that Cooperative. This Re-Provisioning Service shall be provided at no added charge to such Cooperative Enterprises. This Re-Provisioning Service shall be provided in return for periodic premiums, paid to the Office, by such Cooperative Enterprises, for Insurance against changes in Office Standard Designs that result from technological/competitive obsolescence of the previous Standard Designs, and/or from advances in safety features, and/or from advances in national or international Social Best Practices otherwise (Social Depreciation, Moral Depreciation, Non-Physical Depreciation Insurance).

Sub-Section 5.k [Provision of Social Property Assets to Producers' Cooperatives:  Eligibility] Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperatives shall be Eligible for Provisioning and Re-Provisioning Services, if Qualified for the granting, in Stewardship, of Office Standard Design Social Property. Operations to determine such Qualification shall be delegated, by the Office, to specialized, competing, democratically self-governing Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises, certified by the Office, per Congressional statutory criteria, and per Office rules and regulations, to be Qualified to function as competing, self-governing Social Bank Cooperatives. Each such Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise shall be restricted, by the Office, by Charter, to operate within a specific geographical locus. Each shall be granted Stewardship of Office financial assets Social Property, allocated to it in accordance with the principle of Citizen Allocational Equity, for use in the purchase of Office-Standard-Design Production assets from the Office, for transfer to the Stewardship of non-bank Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperatives under its credit administration.  Each such Receiver of Office Standard Design Production Plant and Equipment Social Property must be further Qualified for such Provision by means of the approval of their Annual Operating Plans/Budgets by the Citizen Steward Members-elected Board of Directors of that Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise which is the direct Social Property Provider to said Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative.  The income of each Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise shall be limited to a percentage, re-determined annually by Congress, of the Social Property Rent revenues actually received by the Office from the Citizen Stewardship Equity Producer's Cooperatives who receive Social Property in Stewardship via that Social Bank, under its credit administration, and shall be remitted to that Social Bank in monthly payments by the Office. A given month's Social Rent share payment to a given Social Bank for a given Producers' Cooperative under its credit administration shall be withheld in the event of a default of that month's Social Rent payment by that Producers' Cooperative.  Social Rent share payments to a given Social Bank for a given Producers' Cooperative under its credit administration shall cease permanently in the event of the Insolvency of said Producers' Cooperative.

Sub-Section 5.l [Stewardship Equity Social Banks:  Stewardship of Financial Social Property] Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Bank, lawfully allocated partial usufruct of Social Property financial assets by the Office of the Custodian of Social Property, shall not be conferred any ownership of said assets, on behalf of its Citizen-Steward Members, either collectively, or personally. Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise shall retain its Stewardship Equity Rights of socially-productive disposition of said financial assets, only while remaining in good standing in regard to the statutes of Citizen Stewardship Equity Enterprise Self-Governance and Solvency, as well as in regard to its co-promulgation and co-administration of the Annual Operating Plans and Budgets of its Providee Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperatives, in accord with the statutes governing Citizen Externality Equity Rights, and Citizen Allocational Equity Rights, per its Charter. Otherwise, its Stewardship Qualification Certification, and its Social Property allocation, shall be revoked by the Office of the Custodian of Social Property.

Sub-Section 5.m [Citizen Externality Equity Constraint of Citizen Stewardship Equity Powers] Each member of the First House of the co-management committee of each local operating unit of each Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative, as a democratically self-governing Enterprise, shall be nominated by, elected by, and potentially recallable by, the Citizen-Stewards who are the collective self-employees of that local operating unit, on a one self-employee, one vote basis. The Second House of each such local operating co-management committee shall be its Citizen Externality Equity Rights-based, publicly-elected Board of Public Directors. If a Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise consists of only a single local operating unit, its employee-elected Board of Directors shall constitute the First House of its co-management committee, and its publicly-elected Citizen Externality Equity Board of Public Directors shall constitute the Second House thereof.

Sub-Section 5.n [Tribunals for Social Productivity Advancement] Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise, or any class thereof, shall be empowered to petition the Office of the Custodian of Social Property for an update of the Office Standard Design of Production Plant and Equipment for one or more product/service categories. Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of courts, the Tribunals for Social Productivity Advancement. The specific function of these Tribunals shall be to adjudicate cases wherein petitions to said Office for update of one or more Standard Designs, for one or more standard product/service categories, are in dispute among Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises, or wherein one or more Standard Design update decisions are in dispute between the Office of the Custodian of Social Property and more than one Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise.  Individual Citizens, and Citizens Groups, including Associations of Public Directors at all levels, shall also have standing in these Tribunals, to file “friend of the court” and other briefs, and to provide testimony, under oath, regarding the expected Externalities impact, other social impacts, and natural basis of society impacts, of proposed updates of Office Standard Design(s) of Production Plant and Equipment for one or more product/service categories, which are already under petition to these Tribunals.

Sub-Section 5.o [Stewardship Enterprise Insolvency] The insolvency of a Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise shall require the dissolution of that Enterprise, and, therefore, in likelihood, the temporary unemployment of its former Citizen Steward Members, and, as a result thereof, draws upon their Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds for unemployment insurance payments during their periods of unemployment. In the event of such Insolvency, the Social Property held in Stewardship by that Cooperative Enterprise shall be returned to the custody of the Office of the Custodian of Social Property. The civil liability of an Insolvent Citizen Stewardship Cooperative Enterprise to its creditors shall be limited to the value of the totality of its collectively owned, non-Social-Property assets, and shall not include any of the Personal Property assets, or any of the Social Trust Fund assets, of its former Citizen Steward Members.

Sub-Section 5.p [Political Contributions by Citizen Stewardship Equity Enterprises]  Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise may contribute to political candidates, and/or to political causes, but only out of funds deducted from the net profits of that Enterprise, and only by at least a three-quarters majority favorable vote of its entire electoral base of Citizen Stewards.

Sub-Section 5.q [Countervailing Citizen Rights]  Citizens are empowered, by constitutional right, granted hereby, to organize and enact, using their own resources, Boycotts of the products and/or of the services offered for sale by one or more Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises that said Citizens believe to have intervened in the Legislative, and/or Judicial, and/or Executive, and/or Economic-Democratic processes of the United States of America as a whole, or in that of any Region, State, County, or Municipality thereof, in a manner or manners that they, in their own individual and/or collective judgment, deem to be inimical to the General Welfare.

Section 6. [Constitution of the Tribunals Established under this Amendment] The Citizen Equity Rights Tribunals established under this Amendment -- the Tribunals for Stockholder Equity, the Tribunals for Externality Equity, the Tribunals for Birthright Equity, the Tribunals for Stewardship and Allocational Equity, the Tribunals for Social Productivity Advancement, and the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity – shall be governed by the following provisions, as elaborated by Congress, and the Executive, in statute and regulation.

Sub-Section 6.a [General Function of Said Tribunals] The general function of each court shall be to hear law suits brought by one or more Citizens/other constitutional entities, alleging violation of the Citizen Equity Rights of its jurisdiction.

Sub-Section 6.b [Actionable Parties] Parties against whom complaints of violation of Citizen Equity Rights can be brought, in the Tribunal of Jurisdiction for each such Right, shall include Congress, and one, or more, of the following:  The President, or agency of, the Federal Executive Branch, State Government, County Government, Municipal Government, Joint Stock Enterprise Board of Directors, Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise Board of Directors, House of a local co-management committee of a Stewardship Equity Cooperative or Joint Stock Enterprise, Public Director, Association Director, and/or individual Citizen.

Sub-Section 6.c [Standing] Any one or more Citizens shall have standing to bring legal action(s) before any of these courts.

Sub-Section 6.d [Jurisdictions of Tribunals] The jurisdiction of each Tribunal established by this Amendment shall be restricted to the upholding of the specific Citizen Equity Right or Rights chartered herein to its protection, adjudicating actions brought before it alleging violation of that Right, or of those Rights, by any one or more of the Actionable Parties stipulated herein. Legal actions alleging the violation of a Citizen Equity Right must originate in the Tribunal of Jurisdiction for the Right or Rights whose violation is alleged, and not in any other, or general, Federal, State, or Municipal court, civil or criminal, of law or of equity, and may, after adjudication in its Tribunal of Jurisdiction, be appealed solely to the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity.

Sub-Section 6.e [Rights of Appeal to/from the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity] Legal actions originated and decided in a Tribunal of Jurisdiction for a given Citizen Equity Right may be appealed, by the losing, or partially losing, Party or Parties of that action, to the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity, if the grounds of appeal set forth in statute by Congress are met by said appeal per the Citizen Jury of said Appellate Court. Any appeal from any ruling of the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity shall be solely to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Sub-Section 6.f [Modes of Redress Provided via Tribunal Citizen Jury Award to Prevailing Plaintiffs]  Injunctive relief, payments of value in compensation for civil damages, and sanctions against criminal conduct (fines and/or imprisonment) in cases for which the specific convicted violations of Citizen Equity Rights have been placed under criminal penalty by Congress, in statute, shall be available for imposition by Citizen Juries of the Tribunals for Citizen Equity Rights, and/or by he Appellate Court for Generalized Equity.

Sub-Section 6.g [Functions of Justices] Each individual circuit court for Citizen Equity Rights, and the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity, shall be convened by a single advisory justice. Justices shall serve as moderators of the court proceedings, and in an impartial advisory and expert consultative capacity regarding relevant laws and regulations history, precedent, and procedure, to plaintiffs, to defendants, and to Citizen Juries, in the proceedings brought before them, and shall have authority to require compliance, in the court room, with legal procedure and judicial order, on the part of the Parties to the legal action, and/or on that of their representatives.

Sub-Section 6.h [Constitution and Functions of Citizen Juries] Citizen Juries shall serve in a deciding capacity with regard to the legal actions brought before them. Citizen Juries shall decide the legal actions brought before them by majority vote.  Citizen Juries shall consist of an odd number of Jurors, to help minimize the frequency of Jury deadlock.

Sub-Section 6.i [Selection of Citizen Jurors Pools] All able-bodied adult Citizens shall make themselves available to serve, on a standard salary basis, and on a one month per year basis, in Citizen Jury Pools from which the Citizen Jurors of the Citizen Equity Rights Tribunals, and of the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity, shall be selected, by random lot.

Sub-Section 6.j [Allocation of Costs of Adjudication] The losing party in any legal action brought before a Citizen Equity Rights Tribunal or before the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity -- or all parties to any such action, in proportion set by its Citizen Jury, in the event of a mixed decision -- shall pay the costs of that action, per general court costs schedules set by the justices.
 
Sub-Section 6.k [Term Limits, Justices] Justices shall serve four year terms, with a limit of three consecutive terms.

Sub-Section 6.l [Recall of Justices] Each justice of a Citizen Equity Rights Tribunal, and of the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity, as established by this Amendment, shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 1% or greater of the Federal Electorate, and replaced if a majority of that Electorate voting so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes.

Section 7. [Fourth Branch of Government:  Countervailing Power Intent]  The new institutions established hereby -- the Tribunals for Stockholder Equity, the Boards of Public Directors, the Associations of Public Directors, the Tribunals for Externality Equity, the Commission for Birthright Equity, the Social Trust Funds Administration, the Tribunals for Birthright Equity, the competing and democratically self-governing Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises, the Office of the Custodian of Social Property, the Tribunals for Stewardship and Allocational Equity, the Tribunals for Social Productivity Advancement, and the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity -- shall together constitute the Economic-Democratic Fourth Branch of social self-governance of the United States of America, under the Constitution of the United States of America. This Fourth Branch is hereby established explicitly with the intention to benefit each Citizen, regardless of the scale of that Citizen's Personal Property ownership, including, especially, by countervailing against the lethal corruption of the democratic processes of the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branches, by the otherwise unchecked power of ownership-concentrated, oligopolized or monopolized private economic wealth, to which the initially more competitive  private-capital based economy inexorably gives rise.   


[TERMINUS].

























Sunday, November 20, 2016

What If Bernie Sanders Had Won The Democratic Presidential Nomination? -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES. Excerpt from a Recent Dialogue with a Reader.









What If Bernie Sanders Had Won The Democratic Presidential Nomination? -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.  Excerpt from a Recent Dialogue with a Reader.







Dear Reader,



NOTE:  This blog-entry is an expression of my personal views.  It does not necessarily represent the views of the F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison, of the F.E.D. General Council, or of Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica at large.  Nor does it necessarily, in any way, represent the views of the Equitist Advocacy group.


For background to the thoughts expressed below, see our, related, earlier blog-entries --



Regards,

Miguel







Q.:  . . . I reject the idea that Bernie would have won the Presidency had he been the nominee.  He went as far as someone who calls himself a Socialist could go.  The alternative right led by Trump would have been joined by some of the main stream media to prevent it from happening.  Cynical as this may sound, I agree with film maker Michael Moore that progressives need their own celebrity-actor kind of person to take down people like Trump.  I often think the Presidency is won as a "likability" contest, with the person you would most like to have a drink with at the neighborhood bar being the winner.  Unfortunately this time it seems to have put us in a real pickle!


R.:  The good news is that a self-avowed socialist got as far as Bernie did in the primaries [Even if Bernie’s notion of “socialism” is nothing more than Rooseveltian, reform state-capitalism]. 
And that the ruling class owned “mainstream media” have thoroughly discredited themselves, in front of the American people, and in front of the rest of the worlds’ people. 

This makes this latest national election season a watershed in U.S. history -- nothing like it since Eugene Debs, or since the ascendance of the Roosevelt faction of the ruling class over the Rockefeller faction in the pit of the Great Depression.

However, ruling classes, when they see a swelling democratic populism rising up from the grass roots, often turn to right-wing pseudo-populism, and to police-state dictatorship, to suppress that rising. 

Mussolini made noises as if he were “pro-worker” during the Great Depression in Italy.

The Rockefeller-funded “eugenics” movement in Germany morphed into the take-over, in the pit of the Great Depression, of the Weimar Republic by the National Socialist 
Workers’ Party, whose German acronym is, of course “N.A.Z.I.”.

Still, there are some “Rooseveltian” aspects to Trump’s stated program -- a $1 trillion+ infrastructure rebuilding program, government-aided day care for working parents, not repealing Social Security and Medicare, as the Paul Ryan [Rockefeller] “Republicans” want. 

Trump might have trouble with the subservience of being a Rockefeller ‘servant-dictator’, which is how Mussolini and Hitler started out [they too, of course, later turned on the Rockefellers, and tried to take the Rockefellers’ place as global dictators: became ‘franken-dictators’].

Trump may try to replace the Rockefeller “dynastic” family with his own “dynastic” family as the “leading family” of the ruling faction of the ruling class.

The last time anybody tried this, was when the Kennedy “dynastic” family, which had switched allegiance from the Rockefeller faction to the Roosevelt faction, achieved a U.S. and worldwide popularity not seen since Franklin Roosevelt himself, and looked as if they might be headed for ruling class leadership. 

We know what happened then.

The trouble about Michael Moore’s astute point is that democratic-populist leaders with that kind of charisma tend to have to pay very high premiums to get life insurance!


































Friday, November 11, 2016

The Trump Electoral-College Victory -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES. Excerpt from a Dialogue with a Reader.





The Trump Electoral-College Victory -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

Excerpt from a Dialogue with a Reader.







Dear Reader,


NOTE TO READERS:  This blog-entry is an expression of my personal views.  It does not necessarily represent the views of the F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison, of the F.E.D. General Council, or of Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica at large.  Nor does it necessarily, in any way, represent the views of the Equitist Advocacy group.


For background to the thoughts expressed below, see our, related, earlier blog-entry --








For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 



For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as illustrated books by the F.E.D. Press, see --


https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!








Q.:  . . . your thoughts on the unexpected Trump victory?

R.:  At least, we don't have to worry about Rockefeller 'Global Warming Austerity' [prelude to global "eugenics" 'humanocide', because "people are pollution"] for a while!

[see:  http://capitalismsfundamentalflaw-wayforward.blogspot.com/2013/03/plutocracy-publicly-proclaims-planned.html].

And, another key piece of progress is that Rockefeller-prostitute pollsters, pundits, newscasters, and newspapers -- the whole Rockefeller mass media establishment -- has been deeply discredited in the eyes of the American people, and in the eyes of millions of people all over the world.  

That should give room for different voices to be heard, and to be tested, by the same peoples, America-wide, and world-wide!
 

More than that, Trump is talking about a massive infrastructure re-building program, and a ‘‘‘re-industrialization’’’ of America, that could bring millions of American workers back into better-paid employment, and out of their Rockefeller-engineered depression and drugs/suicide syndrome, if implemented.

Such a program that is diametrically opposed to the Rockefellers' plans for accelerated de-industrialization, their plans to dismantle the coal industry, etc., because it is directly in the best interests of the vast majority of the American people, and of the majority of the peoples of the rest of the world, who the Rockefellers plan to, and are already succeeding at, up to now, ‘eugenicizing’.

Trump is also talking about government child care
/day care assistance to millions of working Americans, and about other programs which are not traditional [Rockefeller-]Republican "destroy the social safety net" programs.

This means that there is danger that the Rockefellers will organize an assassination of Trump, or arrange another “little accident” for him, putting the more “malleable”, theocratic-totalitarian Pence in Trump’s place. 

However, such a course of action would be extremely dangerous for the Rockefellers, possibly re-exposing their whole history of political assassinations, not to mention risking “popular unrest”.

In any case -- unless Trump has secretly made a deal with the Rockefellers behind the scenes, and really plans to quickly drop all of this pro-majority and pro-productive-forces talk, and to re-emphasize the racist, ‘ethnicist’, and fascist aspects of his appeal instead, giving the Rockefellers a fast track to a Mussolini-like state-capitalist totalitarian ‘servant-dictatorship’ in the U.S. -- we could see open warfare within the ruling class, such as we have not seen since the Rockefellers exterminated all of the politically viable members of the Kennedy family, plus Martin Luther King, Jr., or since the victory of the Roosevelt faction of the ruling class, over the Rockefeller faction, in the 1930s to 1940s.

Trump seems to be buying the support, or at least the non-opposition, of non-Rockefeller factions of the capitalist ruling class, via promises to drastically lower the U.S. corporate income tax rate, from ~35% to ~15%, and to give vast tax cuts to the super-rich -- about $200,000.00 per year per family, as opposed to about $140.00 per year per family for the U. S. majority. 

This hyper-enrichment of the already rich may or may not lead to accelerated capital re-investment in re-industrializing America, and in re-building American infrastructure, putting ~25,000,000 American workers to work in decent-paying jobs.

This, plus the infrastructure program that Trump is paying lip-service to, will vastly increment the U.S. annual fiscal deficits, and national debt, perhaps by about $11 trillion over the next 8 years, amounting to a massive “Keynesian” fiscal stimulus. 

That stimulus money, if well-spent -- if spent productively, and if it leads to a massive increase in both working-class and capitalist incomes -- could at least partially “pay for itself”, by increasing workers’ and capitalists’ income tax payments.  But it is risky, and it is contrary to traditional [Rockefeller-]Republican “principles”.

Paul Ryan would rather repeal Social Security and Medicare, and place every government program other than the military, and the welfare-for-the-rich programs, on hyper-austerity.

Ryan may resist Trump’s stated plans, and even block them.  That may give Trump an excuse to drop them. 

Then again, Ryan may be voted out of the speakership by a “Trump caucus” in the House.

It remains true that a massive re-industrialization of America, a rebuilding of American social infrastructure to be “second to none”, a re-negotiation of “free” trade treaties that the Rockefellers designed to export U.S. working-class jobs to the Rockefellers’ servant-dictatorships outside of the U.S., where wages are low, and workers are murdered by those servant dictatorships if they try to organize unions to raise wages, and a roll-back of the Rockefellers’ plans for ‘Global Warming Austerity’, which they designed so as to bankrupt [so that they can buy-up on the cheap, hence control] the parts of the energy industry that the Rockefellers do not yet own, and to further de-industrialize and impoverish the American -- and the European -- working classes, sapping what is left of democracy in the process, that Trump-promised roll-back of Rockefeller 'Global Warming Austerity' is “just what the doctor ordered”.


If Trump has not already secretly sold out to the Rockefellers, then they are likely to see his Presidency as a mortal threat to their power, and to react like a cornered beast.










SOLUTION

 

Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY; 

 

BOOK:

MARXS MISSING BLUEPRINTS


Free of Charge Download of Book PDF --

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order --

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH