Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward

Saturday, January 10, 2026

The Coming Irruption of a ‘META-Humanity’: ¿Potentially De-Stabilizing? GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

The Coming

Irruption

of a

‘META-Humanity’:

¿Potentially

De-Stabilizing?

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

Dear Reader,

We had expected that all 3 of the new species of the «genos» of the ‘meta-human’, that we had predicted, would tend to develop concurrently – not sequentially or successively, but, instead, with all 3 species emerging together, all 3 with a fairly uniform rate of emergence among themselves.

It now appears that the ‘human-genomic self-re-engineering’ species, and the ‘cyborg prosthetics/-bionics’ species, are lagging behind, in their rates of ‘protoic’ development, the rate of ‘protoic’ development of the ‘AI android robotic’ species.

However, the AI android robots so far publicly fielded are still way behind the human-genomic species in ambulatory bipedality, in manual dexterity, and, especially, in any full achievement of self-conscious self-sentience.

Moreover, there may be more rapid developments ongoing in ‘human-genomic self-re-engineering’, and in ‘cyborg prosthetics/bionics’, that the developers want to keep hidden, for obvious, and, perhaps, also for not so obvious reasons.

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

www.dialectics.info

and

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

¡ENJOY!

Regards,

Miguel Detonacciones,

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

Friday, January 09, 2026

‘Birthright Equity’ All-Citizens’ Trust Funds VERSUS Irksome Bureaucracy. Part 2. of the ‘Citizen Birthright Equity’ series. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

‘Birthright

Equity’

All-Citizens’

Trust Funds

VERSUS

Irksome Bureaucracy.

Part 2. of the

‘Citizen Birthright

Equity’ series.

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

Dear Reader,

There is no doubt that converting social property, all-citizens’ national funds, to the personal property of individual citizens, by right of birth, as detailed in Karl Seldon’s book Marx’s Missing Blueprints, involves “moral hazard”, if expenditures from those trust funds are not somehow limited to socially desirable – to majority class electorate desirable – uses.

What sober citizen would want new Citizens, starting at 18 years of age, to be able to squander their socialized trust funds on alcohol, cocaine, heroin, gambling, or myriads of other socially destructive – and personally self-destructive – activities.

The U.S. version of the Equitist amendment – or ‘amendatory annex’ – to the U.S. Constitution, should spell-out, broadly, the approved uses of Birthright Trust Fund assets.

The regulations – after nationwide citizens’ review and electoral consent – of the Social Trust Funds Administration, should spell-out in detail, the rules, per the majority electorate’s will, regarding for what kinds of purchases are permitted for Birthright-Trust funds.

However, it would be exceedingly irksome, and would brook continuing, smoldering, seething popular resentment, about paternalism, and bureaucratic despotism, if planned spendings of Birthright-Trust funds were required to be submitted, before expenditure, to the national Social Trust Funds Administration bureaucracy, allowing that bureaucracy to exercise prior restraint upon Birthright Trust Funds spending.

It would be far less irksome, we hold, to adopt, instead, an analogue of a longstanding and largely successful business practice with regard to business expense accounts.

For example, if you work for a business, and travel on behalf of that business, it is typical to, first, be asked to read the rules for the types of, e.g., business travel expenses for which that business allows reimbursement, and then to bring your receipts for your travel expenditures back with you from your business travels, and to submit them to that business’s accounting arm for reimbursement review.

If some of your receipts are for expenses that are ruled non-reimbursable, per that business’s expense-accounts rulebook, then you don’t get reimbursed for those expenses and, if you want to keep your job, you probably don’t want to protest those non-reimbursed expenses too much.

So we think, with Seldon, that ‘Birthright Equity Trust Fund’ expenditures should be managed on a reimbursement basis.

If your local arm of your national Social Trust Funds Administration turns down one of your reimbursement requests, you are in a better position to protest than if you were an employee of a capitalist business.

As a Citizen, you can’t be “fired” for protesting such a decision not to reimburse your personal funds expenditure from your Birthright Equity Trust Fund.

You have abundant, multi-level opportunities to appeal that non-reimbursement within the Social Trust Funds Administration.

If you have exhausted all levels of appeal within that Administration, and are not satisfied with the results of your appeals within that Administration, you have standing to file a lawsuit against that Administration with the proximate ‘Tribunal for Citizen Birthright Equity’, and even to appeal through all levels of those Tribunals, and, if still unsatisfied, to appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Of course, if the Justice Officers of any of these courts – who are elected, mandated, term-limited, and recallable by the electorate, even within their limited terms – find your appeal to their court to be without merit, they can refuse to hear your appeal. And, if your case is heard, but you lose on that appeal, you are liable for the court costs of that appeal.

If the general expenditure regulations of the national Social Trust Funds Administration become too onerous for the majority of the electorate, at any time, a petition campaign can be successfully launched from the “grass roots” of that electorate, and a national referendum held to change the onerous general regulations nation-wide.

Granted, this is not a “perfect” solution. Such “perfect” solutions are not available in the human Domain. But it is, we hold, a far less irksome and far less offensive alternative than a “prior restraint” regime.

www.dialectics.info

and

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

¡ENJOY!

Regards,

Miguel Detonacciones,

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

SOLUTION –

‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’;

BOOK:

MARX’S MISSING BLUEPRINTS

Free-of-Charge Download of Book PDF –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

Hardcover Book Order –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

Friday, January 02, 2026

“Trump Accounts” as ‘Protoic’ to ‘Citizen Birthright Equity’. Part 1. of the ‘Citizen Birthright Equity’ series. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

“Trump Accounts”

‘Protoic’ to

‘Citizen

Birthright

Equity’.

Part 1. of the

‘Citizen Birthright

Equity’ series.

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

Dear Reader,

The “Trump Accounts”, established into law, as part of the Trump Administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill”, on July 4^th 2025, represent, albeit still “this side” of an ‘Equitist’ social relations of production revolution, are ‘proto-ic’ toward the establishment of the advanced new human right, and new social property right, of ‘Citizen Birthright Equity’, as we have here described it many times before.

In some ways, the “Trump Accounts” implement previous “baby bonds” proposals.

The features of the “Trump Accounts”, intended to give many U.S. children an economic, financial “head-start” in life, and a “head-start” on retirement savings in particular, even from birth, can be summarized as follows –

· Seeded by a $1,000. payment from the U.S. Treasury;

· Eligibility is for U.S. Citizen children, born between 01 Jan. 2025 and 31 Dec. 2028, and with a valid Social Security number for themselves and for at least one of their parents;

· No eligibility restriction based upon parental income level;

· Must be invested in a low-cost fund tracking a major U.S. stock index, such as the S&P 500, the average compound interest rate of which is ~10%, implying a deposit worth ~$490,000. by the child’s retirement age, even with no further deposits beyond the initial $1,000. “Trump Account” earnings grow tax free;

· Parents can add up to $5,000. per year to their child’s “Trump Account”, up to their child’s 18^th year. This amount limit will grow via inflation indexing after 2027;

· A parent’s employer can contribute up to half of the annual $5,000. limit on behalf of that parent’s child, tax free to that parent and to their child;

· The “Trump Account” funds basically cannot be used until the child reaches 18 years-of-age;

· Unlike IRAs, the “Trump Account” contributions do not require the child to have earned income from employment;

· Unlike IRAs, the “Trump Accounts” have no “Required Minimum Distributions” [RMDs];

· Unlike the case with IRAs, parental or employer additions to “Trump Accounts” are not tax deductible;

· Distributions from “Trump Accounts” are taxed at the, generally lower, long term capital gains rate: 15% to 20%.

While not as universal or as generous as our proposed ‘Citizen Birthright Equity’ socialized trust funds, for every new Citizen born after the constitutional establishment of that right of birth, the “Trump Accounts” are both materially significant and psychohistorically powerful in advancing, U.S.-society-wide, the logic of ‘societal self-investment’ in each Citizen, with an individual, ‘totally-portable’, “social safety net” provision, tied directly to each Citizen-person from birth.

None of the “moral hazard”-mitigation provisions, that we propose as part of the ‘Citizen Birthright Equity’ constitutional human right/property right, are involved in the “Trump Accounts” provisions.

Ultra-successful capitalists Michael and Susan Dell have expanded the reach of the “Trump Accounts” by a large donation that will make $250. seed contributions available to “Trump Accounts” for ~ 25 million children who were 10 years-of-age or younger prior to 01 Jan. 2025, and who live in zip code areas with median annual family income levels less than or equal to $150,000.

All in all, we see this whole development, including the social dialogues about “baby bonds” before the “Trump Accounts” came into “the law of the land”, as evidence of the emergence of concepts of the kind that we call ‘Citizen Birthright Equity’ within the contemporary «Zeitgeist».