Tuesday, March 24, 2020

“DOT” #08: “Stealth Eugenics”. “DOTS” SERIES.

DOTS SERIES -- DOT#08:  Stealth Eugenics.

Dear Reader,

This new series, entitled “DOTS” -- as in “connecting the dots” -- is intended to provide you with ‘evidentiary excerpts’ from the many years of research, by Karl Seldon, initially, and, later, by the Foundation as a whole, on the ‘‘‘lawful’’’ [as in “law-of-value”-‘‘‘lawful’’’] but secret global agenda and strategy of the ‘descendence phase’ capitalist ruling class.

We plan to present these excerpts here, within this new series, together with their source references, usually without any commentary, by us, as to how we “connect” these “dots”, to give you, our reader, the chance to make your own “connections” on your own.

We will, generally, set forth our GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES, giving our version of the interconnections of these “dots”, and our hypotheses to explain these “dots”, elsewhere.  Some of our hypotheses such are already extant in past entries to this blog.

DOTSSeries [as in “connecting the dots”.] -- DOT #8: 

Stealth Eugenics. 

Thomas Ferguson, Latin American “case officer” of the U.S. State Department bureau originally known as the “Office of Population Affairs”, established in 1975 by Henry Kissinger, and later rechristened “The U. S. State Department Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs”, stated as follows --

There is a single theme behind all our work -- we must reduce population levels.” 

“Either they [Ed.:  targeted foreign governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador... .” 

“Population is a political problem.” 

“Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it.”

“The Professionals aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons.  That sounds nice.”

“We look at resources and environmental constraints.” 

“We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population -- or else we will have trouble.”

“So steps are taken.”

“El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis.” 

“The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower their population.”

“Now they get a civil war because of it... .”

“There will be dislocation and food shortages... .”

“There were just too goddamned many people... .”

“To really reduce population, quickly, you have to pull all the males into the fighting and you have to kill significant numbers of fertile age females... .”

“The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa, or through disease like the Black Death... .”

Could the breakdown of the rule of law, of late, and Narco-gang rule, in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, which is, e.g., motivating parents there to send their children, unaccompanied, North for the hundreds of miles to get to the U.S. border, in hopes of their getting into the U.S., and, thereby, into a chance at a decent life -- could all of that be among the long-term unforeseen consequences of the ‘Stealth Eugenicspolicies described by the State Department official in his statement, above?

¿Could those consequences even be PART OF THE PLAN?

¿Likewise, the state of dual power/civil war between the Narco-gangs and the elected government in Mexico itself, which is so drastically holding-back or even reversing the progress of Mexican society?

For more information regarding these Marxian and Seldonian insights, please see:


For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:



Miguel Detonacciones

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

No comments:

Post a Comment